The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman 1ps phase separator

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in France

The Whatman 1PS phase separator is a laboratory filtration product designed to effectively separate two immiscible liquid phases. It is a high-quality paper-based filter that is suitable for a variety of applications requiring liquid-liquid separation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using whatman 1ps phase separator

1

Metabolite Profiling of Aspergillus Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-cultures of strains MACI46 (NRRL 66708), MACI219 (NRRL 66709), MACI254 (NRRL 66710) and MACI264 (NRRL 66711) incubated in the dark at 27 °C for seven days. For metabolite profile characterization, isolates were cultured in four different media: MEA, CYA, YES agar, and Potato Dextrose Agar medium (PDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France). For each medium, three biological replicates were inoculated centrally with 10 µL of calibrated spore suspensions (105 spores/mL) prepared from seven-day cultures on 7.5 cm Petri dishes. The samples were incubated in the dark at 27 °C for seven days.
To perform extrolite extractions, culture media were macerated and placed in 50 mL sterilized tubes, and thereafter 35 mL of ethyl acetate was added to each sample. Samples were agitated 48 h in an orbital incubator at 170 rpm at room temperature. Ethyl acetate was filtered through a Whatman 1PS phase separator (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) and evaporated at 60 °C until dry. Samples were then dissolved in 400 µL of methanol. To eliminate possible impurities, each sample was filtered through a 0.45 µm disk filter (ThermoFisher Scientific, Illkirch, France) [81 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Aflatoxin B1 Quantification by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFB1 analysis was done as described by El Khoury et al. [19 (link)]. In brief, AFB1 extraction was done with 30 mL of HPLC-grade absolute chloroform. Next, supernatants were filtered through a Whatman 1PS phase separator (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). Two milliliters of filtrate were evaporated to dryness in a STUART SBH200D/3 sample concentrator (Stuart equipment, Paris, France) at 45 °C, and the samples were re-solubilized in 2 mL of acetonitrile. Finally, the samples were filtered through 0.45 μm disk filters (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) and placed in HPLC vials. AFB1 was analyzed by using an Ultimate 3000 UPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) with an EvoC18 column (3 µm, 150 × 3.2, Phenomenex, Le Pecq, France) conditioned at 27 °C. The elution program used for separation consisted of forming an isocratic mixture composed of acetonitrile and water (25:75 v:v). The mobile phase had a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min. Ten microliters of sample were injected. AFB1 was detected by using a fluorescent detector at 365 (430) nm excitation (emission) wavelengths. The identity of the molecule was confirmed by analyzing the UV absorption spectrum by an additional diode matrix detector (DAD) coupled to the system. AFB1 production levels were calculated based on a standard calibration curve (0.16 to 20 mg/L).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC-FLD Quantification of Aflatoxin B1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative determination of aflatoxin B1 production by HPLC-FLD was adapted from Caceres et al. [31 (link)]. Culture media were first mixed with 30 mL of chloroform and agitated for 2 h on a horizontal shaking table (150 rpm at room temperature). Chloroform extracts were then filtered through a Whatman 1PS phase separator (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) and evaporated to dryness at 60 °C. The residue was dissolved in a water–acetonitrile–methanol (65:17.5:17.5; v:v:v) mixture, then filtered (0.45 µm PTFE disks). Ten microliters were finally injected into the HPLC system, a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France) and analyzed using a LC column Luna® C18 (125 × 2 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at 30 °C. The eluent flow was 0.2 mL/min in an isocratic program with eluent A: eluent B (82.5%:17.5%) where eluent A is a mixture of acidified water (0.2% of acetic acid): acetonitrile (79:21; v:v) and eluent B is pure methanol. AFB1 was detected by FLD at 365 nm/430 nm as excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively. AFB1 peaks were confirmed using a coupled diode array detector (DAD) and sample concentrations were calculated based on a linear calibration curve of standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimizing Phenolic Compound Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant material was purchased in a local market in Beirut (Lebanon). Dried leaves of the three plants were used to prepare the extracts.
To determine the solvent mixture required to optimize the extraction of phenolic compounds from the plants, 9 g of dried ground mate were extracted for 2 h in a water bath at 50 °C with 90 mL of one of the following solvents: distilled water, acetone–water (25:75 v:v), acetone–water (50:50 v:v), acetone–water (85:15 v:v), ethanol–water (50:50 v:v), methanol–water (50:50 v:v), or methanol–water (75:25 v:v). Extracts were then filtered through a sterile gauze, followed by a second filtration through a Whatman 1PS phase separator (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). Organic solvent was evaporated by using a rotary evaporator (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) at 60 °C, then the solvent volume was increased to 90 mL by adding distilled water. Finally, the extracts were filtered again through 22 µm nylon syringe filters (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) before being stored at 4 °C until use.
For further experiments, 25 g each of mate, rosemary, and green tea leaves were ground with an electrical grinder. Nine grams of each powder were added to a 150 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 90 mL of acetone–water (1:1, v:v) mixture, and extraction was performed as describe above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Aflatoxin B1 in Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFB1 extraction and quantification were done as previously described [15 (link)]. Culture media were mixed with 30 mL of HPLC-grade absolute chloroform and shaken at 200 rpm for 1 h at room temperature. Supernatants were filtered through a Whatman 1PS phase separator (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). Two mL of the filtrates were evaporated to dryness in a STUART SBH200D/3 sample concentrator (Stuart equipment, Paris, France) at 45 °C and redissolved in 2 mL of acetonitrile. Furthermore, they were filtered through 0.45 μm PTFE disk filters (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) and placed in HPLC vials. AFB1 quantification was done using an Ultimate 3000 UPLC (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) with an EvoC18 column (3 µm, 150 × 3.2 mm, Phenomenex, Le Pecq, France) conditioned at 27 °C. In order to separate AFB1, an elution program consisting of an isocratic mixture of acetonitrile and water (25:75 v:v) was used. The mobile phase had a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min and 10 µL of the sample was injected. Aflatoxin B1 was detected by using a fluorescent detector at 365 (430) nm excitation (emission) wavelengths. A diode matrix detector (DAD) coupled to the system was used to analyze the UV spectra. AFB1 levels were calculated based on a standard calibration curve in a range of 0.16 to 20 µg/mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Polyphenol Extraction from Cannabis Sativa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different organs were manually collected from plants of Cannabis sativa L.: stems, leaves and owers. The organs (25 g each) were ground separately with an electrical grinder. Then, 9 g of powder were extracted with 90 mL of acetone:water (1:1, v:v) mixture in 150 ml sterile glass Erlenmeyer asks. This solvent mixture was found to be the most effective for polyphenol extraction in different plants (data not shown). The asks were held at 50°C in a water bath for 2 hours, following which extracts were ltered through sterile gauze followed by a second ltration through a Whatman 1PS phase separator (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France). The acetone was evaporated with the help of a rotary evaporator at 60°C, following which 90 mL of distilled water were added. Extracts were ltrated again through 22 µm nylon syringe lters (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany). The nal extracts were stored at + 4°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!