The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qrt pcr

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Switzerland, Germany

The QRT-PCR (Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) is a laboratory equipment used for the amplification and quantification of specific nucleic acid sequences. It combines the reverse transcription of RNA into cDNA and the subsequent real-time PCR amplification and detection of the target DNA sequence.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using qrt pcr

1

RNA Sequencing and Enrichment Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA >200 nt was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen) combined with RNeasy columns (Qiagen). 50 ng purified RNA was subjected to polyA selection using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB) and subsequently used for library preparation with the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit (NEB). Libraries were analyzed on a Bioanalyzer (Agilent) for quality control, quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay (Invitrogen) and qRT-PCR (Kapa Biosystems), and equimolar pools were sequenced on HiSeq 2500 or NextSeq 500 instruments (Illumina) using 50-bp or 76-bp single-end protocols, respectively. Expression values (RPKM) were estimated using the TopHat39 (link) and HTSeq-count tools40 (link), and lowly expressed genes (RPKM≤10) were filtered out. Enrichment scores for each gene were calculated by dividing the RPKM value of the target protein RIP by the RPKM value of the no-FLAG control RIP after normalization of each RIP value to its respective input value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Profiling RNA Expression Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAseq libraries (3 longitudinal time points/3 animals) were prepared using the TruSeq protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Briefly, poly (A) + RNA was purified using oligo-dT coated magnetic beads, chemically fragmented followed by cDNA generation using random hexamer primers. The cDNAs ends were repaired and ligated to library adaptors. Following clean-up with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA), the libraries were amplified using 11 PCR cycles. The amplified libraries were cleaned using AMPure XP beads. The library was profiled on a Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) and quantified using qRT-PCR (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA) on a StepOnePlus qRT-PCR workstation (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Libraries were mixed for multiplexing and the final concentration of the mix was determined by qRT-PCR. The mix was diluted to 1 nM for denaturation and then diluted to deliver optimal clustering on the flow cell. Flow cells were prepared on a cBot (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Data was assembled into standard fastq files using Bcl2Fastq (Illumina, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Exome Sequencing of TN4 Family

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood of 11 cases and two unaffected siblings (a brother and a sister) of TN4 (TN1-10 and TN12) with informed consent using NucleoSpin Tissue kit (#740952, Machery-Nagel, Duren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Exome library preparation and sequencing were performed by the Yale Center for Genome Analysis. Briefly, 1 µg of genomic DNA was sheared into fragments with the Covaris E220 system (Covaris, Woburn, MA, United States), followed by end-repair, A-tailing, ligation of multiplexing adaptors, and pre-capture ligation-mediated PCR amplification. The quantification and insert size distribution of product were determined using Caliper LabChip GX system (PerkinElmer Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Exome library was captured using IDT xGen Exome Research Panel V1.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA), and quantified by qRT-PCR using a commercially available kit (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington MA, USA). Libraries were then loaded onto S4 flowcell and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform using 101 bp paired-end sequencing reads according to Illumina protocols (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Sequencing and Enrichment Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA >200 nt was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen) combined with RNeasy columns (Qiagen). 50 ng purified RNA was subjected to polyA selection using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB) and subsequently used for library preparation with the NEBNext Ultra RNA Library Prep Kit (NEB). Libraries were analyzed on a Bioanalyzer (Agilent) for quality control, quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay (Invitrogen) and qRT-PCR (Kapa Biosystems), and equimolar pools were sequenced on HiSeq 2500 or NextSeq 500 instruments (Illumina) using 50-bp or 76-bp single-end protocols, respectively. Expression values (RPKM) were estimated using the TopHat39 (link) and HTSeq-count tools40 (link), and lowly expressed genes (RPKM≤10) were filtered out. Enrichment scores for each gene were calculated by dividing the RPKM value of the target protein RIP by the RPKM value of the no-FLAG control RIP after normalization of each RIP value to its respective input value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bone Marrow Cell mRNA Isolation and qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD34+ and myeloid lineage BM cells (high-density layer) were used for mRNA isolation, using a chloroform extraction protocol, and cDNA synthesis was performed (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) qRT-PCR (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) for HIF1A and DDIT4/REDD1 was performed as described in Supplementary Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of SNORD31 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells, tumors, and adjacent tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) according to manufacturer’s instructions, and RNA concentration and purity were analyzed in triplicate by Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, U.S.A.). After that, the total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using a cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).
To determine the expression level of SNORD31, cDNA sample was tested with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) using kits (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). All samples were tested at least three times. The expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an endogenous control, and relative expression of SNORD31 was calculated by comparative Ct method formula 2−ΔΔCt. The sequences of all PCR primers used were as follows (5′–3′): SNORD31: CACCAGTGATGAGTTGAATTACCG (forward), ACAGCTCAGAAAATACCTTTCAGTC (reverse); GAPDH: CAGGAGGCATTGCTGATGAT (forward), GAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTT (reverse).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Anti-Inflammatory Effects of IO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the inhibitory effects of natural biological active substance from IO on NO production and pro-inflammatory cytokines expression in inflammatory C2C12 myotubes, C2C12 cells were differentiated with new inhibitor candidate and then induced inflammation using TNF-α. NO production was detected using Griess assay and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) total RNA expression was analyzed using quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR, Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the Trizol method. 1 μg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (18080051, Invitrogen). Reverse transcriptase PCR and qRT-PCR (Roche) was performed using gene-specific primers (Table S1) and SYBR green (04707516001, Roche Diagnostics). The RT images were quantified using ImageJ software. qRT-PCR data were used to calculate the relative fold change for each gene compared to control using the value of cycle threshold (CT value). 18S rRNA amplification was used for the normalization of the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from the cartilage layer after thawing and mincing by phenol/guanidine isothiocyanate extraction (peqGOLD Trifast, Peqlab, Germany). For mRNA analysis by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), total RNA was purified by Zymoclean™ Gel DNA Recovery Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions and reverse transcribed into cDNA using Omniscript reverse transcriptase (Qiagen, Germany) and oligo(dT) primers. Gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR (Roche diagnostics, Germany). Depicted percentages of reference genes were calculated as 1.8−ΔCt as recommended by the manufacturer of the PCR cycler. ΔCt is the difference between Ct values of the gene of interest and the arithmetic mean of the reference genes CPSF6 and HNRPH1. Primer sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Retinal Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The designed oligonucleotides are shown in Table 2. Quantitative real-time-PCR (qRT-PCR; Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) technology was performed using SYBR Green I on the Light Cycler® 96 (Roche Applied Science). Primer concentration was optimized to a final concentration of 200 nM and combined with 200 ng of retinal RNAs per well. We set up two reactions per RNA sample (duplicates) with a final volume of 20 μl per single reaction (Ray et al., 2005 (link); Horvat-Brocker et al., 2008 (link); Luft et al., 2014 (link)). Each qRT-PCR was performed in triplicate from each retina and for each point in time and repeated twice. The average threshold cycle (Ct) values of the two independent experiments were used to calculate the ratios for the primers (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)). In order to obtain amplification efficiencies of different primer sets, we generated standard curves by a twofold dilution series with template amounts ranging from 5 to 125 ng cDNA per well. The Ct values of the reference genes (β-actin and cyclophilin) were taken into account. For statistical evaluation of Ct variations and calculated relative expression variations, data were analyzed for significant differences by a pairwise fixed reallocation and randomization test using the REST© software (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!