The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ctc combipal autosampler

Manufactured by CTC Analytics
Sourced in Switzerland, United States

The CTC CombiPAL autosampler is a versatile and reliable instrument designed for automated sample handling and introduction. It is capable of performing a wide range of sample preparation and injection tasks, including liquid, headspace, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) sampling. The CombiPAL autosampler is compatible with a variety of analytical instruments, such as gas chromatographs and liquid chromatographs, making it a valuable tool for various analytical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using ctc combipal autosampler

1

GC-MS Analysis of Derivatised Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A volume of 1 μL of each derivatised sample was injected splitless by a CTC Combi Pal autosampler (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland) into an Agilent 6980 GC equipped with a 10 m X 0.18 mm i.d. fused-silica capillary column chemically bonded with 0.18-um DB 5-MS stationary phase (J&W Scientific Folsom, CA). The injector temperature was set to 270°C. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL min-1 through the column. For every analysis, the purge time was set to 60 s at a purge flow rate of 20 mL min-1 and an equilibrium time of 1 min. The column temperature was held initially at 70°C for 2 min, then increased to 320°C at a rate of 30°C min-1, where it was held for 2 min. The column effluent was introduced into the ion source of a Pegasus III time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Leco Corp., St Joseph, MI). The ion source and transfer line temperatures were set to 200°C and 250°C, respectively. Ions were generated by a 70-ev electron beam at a current of 2.0 mA. Masses were acquired in the mass range 50–800 m/z at a rate of 30 spectra s-1. The acceleration voltage was turned on after a solvent delay of 150 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade. The EPA 524.2 fortification solution (20 μg/mL of fluorobenzene, 4-bromofluorobenzene, and 1,2-dichlorobenzene-d4) (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo Japan) was used as an internal standard (IS). The n-alkane standard solution purchased from Fluka Chemical (Tokyo, Japan) was used for the determination of the RI (C8–C20). The EDTA solution in a concentration of 100 mM (pH 7.5) was used to inhibit enzymatic activity [1 (link)].
The 10 mg of frozen powder of each sample was weighed and dissolved in 1 mL of distilled water to prepare a stock solution. The stock solution of 10 mg/mL concentration was diluted up to 50 µg/mL of working solution and stored in −30 °C up to date of analysis. The working aliquots were sonicated for 10 min using the Branson sonicator (Branson Ultrasonics, CT, USA) before analytes for VOC extraction. The samples were prepared in 20 mL headspace Supelco vials (Missouri, USA) consisted of 1 mL of EDTA solution, 1 mL of the sample solution, and 10 μL of IS.
The preconditioned 50/30 μm solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber assembly DVB/CAR/PDMS purchased from Supelco (Cassopolis, MI, USA) was used to extract VOCs from samples HS. The extracted analytes were sampled through CTC CombiPAL auto-sampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland), purchased from AMR (Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Volatile Compound Extraction from Berries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Berries collected at seven developmental stages as described above were extracted for the analysis of volatile compounds. The extraction of volatile compounds followed the method described by Lan et al. [41 (link)]. For each replicate, sub-samples of 100 g de-seeded berries were grounded and blended with 1 g polyvinylpolypyrrolidone and 0.5 g d-gluconic acid lactone in liquid nitrogen. The blended powder was macerated at 4 °C for 4 h and then centrifuged at 8000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. Obtained clear juice was used for headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME). HS-SPME was automatically conducted by a CTC-CombiPAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland) equipped with a 2 cm DVB/CAR/PDMS 50/30 μm SPME fiber (Supelco, Bellefonete, PA., USA). Briefly, the mixture of 5 mL clear juice and 1 g NaCl, as well as 10 μL 4-methyl-2-pentanol (internal standard), was prepared in a 20 mL vial tightly capped with a PTFE-silicon septum. Samples were agitated at 500 rpm for 30 min at 40 °C, and then the SPME fiber, which was pre-conditioned at 250 °C for 1 h, was inserted into the headspace of the vial to absorb volatiles at 40 °C for 30 min. Afterwards, the SPME fiber was inserted into a gas chromatography injector for 8 min to thermally desorb volatile compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ethanol Quantification in Lignocellulosic Fermentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liquid fraction obtained after the SSF process was analysed for ethanol by gas chromatography coupled with flame ionization detector (GC-FID) by using a 7890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a CTC Combi PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland) and FID detector. 10 µL of sample were introduced in a headspace sample vial and then they were completely evaporated by heating up to a temperature of 105 °C. The ethanol yield (%) was calculated by the Equation (3): YEt =EtfEt00.51 .f. B1.1.111 × 100
where Etf is the ethanol concentration produced during the fermentation (g L−1), Et0 is the ethanol concentration at the beginning of the fermentation (g L−1), which is zero, B is the dry biomass concentration at the beginning of the fermentation (g L−1), f is the glucan fraction of dry biomass (g g−1), 0.51 is the conversion factor of the glucose to ethanol and 1.111 is stoichiometric coefficient of the glucan transformation to glucose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolite Profiling of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten biological replicates were prepared for each experimental condition, as described in Khodayari et al. (2013) (link). The samples were homogenized in 600 µL of methanol-chloroform (2:1) using a bead-beating device (Retsch TM MM301, RetschGbmH, Haan, Germany). A volume of 400 µL of ice-cold ultrapure water was added to each sample, before centrifugation at 4,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Then, aliquots (300 µL) of the upper aqueous phase containing polar metabolites were transferred to microtubes and vacuum-dried. Following derivatization (see Khodayari et al., 2013 (link) for the detailed procedure), metabolites were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), which included a CTC CombiPal autosampler (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland), a Trace GC Ultra chromatograph, and a Trace DSQII quadruple mass spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) (Khodayari et al., 2013) (link). Peaks were annotated using both mass spectra (two specific ions), and retention times. Calibration curves were set using standards consisting of 57 pure reference compounds most often quantified in insects with this equipement. Metabolite levels were quantified using XCalibur v2.0.7 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Volatile Berry Compounds Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each sample set and class, another subsample of 100 g sorted berries was pitted, ground and blended with 1 g of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP). The flesh was macerated at 4°C for 240 min and then centrifuged at 8000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min to obtain clear juice. Five millilitres of clear juice, 1 g of NaCl and 10 μL of 4-methyl-2-pentanol (1.039 mg/mL water, internal standard) were blended in a 15-mL vial containing a magnetic stirrer. The vial was tightly capped with a PTFE-silicone septum. Volatile compounds were extracted using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with a 2 cm DVB/CAR/ PDMS 50/30 μm SPME fibre (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA., USA) on a CTC CombiPAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). The SPME fibre was conditioned at 250°C for 1 h prior to extraction. After being equilibrated at 40°C for 30 min under stirring at 500 rpm, the samples were extracted with the pre-conditioned SPME fibre at 40°C for 30 min under continued heating and agitation. Subsequently, the fibre was immediately desorbed in the GC injector for 8 min at 250°C [17 (link), 18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

GC-TOFMS Analysis of Derivatized Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A volume of 1 μl of each derivatised sample was injected splitless by a CTC Combi Pal autosampler (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland) into an Agilent 6980 GC equipped with a 10 m X 0.18 mm i.d. fused-silica capillary column chemically bonded with 0.18-um DB 5-MS stationary phase (J&W Scientific Folsom, CA). The injector temperature was set to 270°C. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL min-1 through the column. For every analysis, the purge time was set to 60 s at a purge flow rate of 20 mL min-1 and an equilibrium time of 1 min. The column temperature was held initially at 70°C for 2 min, then increased to 320°C at a rate of 30°C min-1, where it was held for 2 min. The column effluent was introduced into the ion source of a Pegasus III time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Leco Corp., St Joseph, MI). The ion source and transfer line temperatures were set to 200°C and 250°C, respectively. Ions were generated by a 70-ev electron beam at a current of 2.0 mA. Masses were acquired in the mass range 50–800 m/z at a rate of 30 spectra s-1. The acceleration voltage was turned on after a solvent delay of 150 s. The detector voltage was 1670 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Headspace SPME for Wine Volatiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Headspace solid-phase microextraction for each wine sample was carried out in duplicate according to our previously published methods [38 (link)]. The wine sample (5 mL) was mixed with 1 g of NaCl and 10 µL of 1.0018 g/L 4-methyl-2-pentanol (internal standard) in a 20-mL PTFE-silicon septum capped vial. Automatic HS-SPME was performed with a 2 cm DVB/CAR/PDMS 50/30 µm SPME fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) on a CTC CombiPAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). The SPME fiber was activated at 250 °C prior sample extraction. Afterwards, the vial containing the sample was moved to the heating/stirring equipment and equilibrated at 40 °C for 30 min. The rate of stirring was 500 rpm. Then the SPME fiber was inserted into the headspace of the vial to adsorb volatiles at 40 °C for 30 min under the same stirring rate. Finally, the fiber was removed from the vial headspace and immediately inserted into the GC injection port to fully desorb the volatiles for 8 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction and Quantification of Microplastics in Wine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of MPs was carried out according to the method described by a previous study with slight modifications [26 (link)]. Wine samples were adjusted to pH 7.0 by the addition of 5 mol/L NaOH solution and then diluted to 5.4% (v/v) alcohol with model solution (2 g/L glucose and 7 g/L tartaric acid without ethanol, pH 7.0). Then, 5 mL of diluted sample was placed in a 20 mL vial with 1.5 g NaCl capped with a PTFE–silicon septum. The equilibration was conducted at 38 °C for 10 min and then 2 cm DVB/CAR/PDMS 50/30 µm SPME fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA., USA) was inserted into the headspace of vial for 65 min to extract MPs. The injection was accomplished by a CTC CombiPAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

GC-MS Metabolite Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GC-MS analyses were performed by using the alcoholic extracts prepared from sugar measurements (see section “Measurements of Body Water and Sugar Contents”). From the remaining 600 μL of the methanol: H2O extract, an aliquot of 300 μL was transferred to new glass vials. Samples were vacuum dried (Speed Vac Concentrator, MiVac, Genevac Ltd., Ipswich, England). We used the derivatization process described by Khodayari et al. (2013) (link), which relies on the use of a CTC CombiPAL autosampler (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland) ensuring on-time preparation and analysis of the samples. The analyses were performed with a GC-MS platform comprising an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph coupled to a 5977B mass spectrometer. We used the same settings as those described in Thiébaut et al. (2021) (link). The detected peaks (electron energy: 70 eV; in full scan mode) were annotated with MassHunter. Concentration of each metabolite was calculated using individual quadratic calibration curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!