The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Opticross

Manufactured by Boston Scientific
Sourced in United States, Japan

The OptiCross is a lab equipment product designed for medical and scientific applications. It provides optical cross-sectional imaging capabilities to support various research and analysis tasks. The core function of the OptiCross is to capture and display high-resolution, cross-sectional images of samples or specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using opticross

1

Intravascular Ultrasound Examination of Culprit Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients were performed with coronary angiography by standard Judkins technique. IVUS examination was performed using an IVUS system (iLAB™ Ultrasound Imaging System, Boston Scientific, USA) and a 40 MHz intravascular catheter (OptiCross™, Boston Scientific, USA) before any intervention. The IVUS catheter was advanced into the culprit vessel more than 10 mm beyond the culprit lesion and withdrawn at a pullback speed of 0.5 mm/s automatically. In this study, a culprit lesion was defined as the lesion related to the clinical event, as identified by both coronary angiography and electrocardiogram findings. A ruptured plaque was defined as the plaque contained a cavity that communicated with the lumen with an overlying residual fibrous cap fragment. A fragmented and loosely adherent plaque without a distinct cavity and without a fibrous cap fragment was not considered as a plaque rupture [14 (link)]. IVUS quantitative analysis was performed by two independent experienced interventional cardiologists who were blinded to the patients’ clinical information according to the criteria of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on IVUS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tracking IVUS Catheter Movement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the 3D position and orientation of the IVUS catheter, a six degrees of freedom (6DOF) EM sensor (0.8 × 9 mm, NDI Corporation, Canada) was attached to the outer surface of the IVUS catheter with an EM tracking system (Aurora Tracking System, NDI Corporation, Canada) (Fig. 1a). Images were acquired using a 40 MHz IVUS catheter (Opticross, Boston Scientific, USA) with a 2.6 Fr imaging window profile. The video stream was transmitted from the IVUS system to a computer using a video capture card (DVI2USB, Epiphan Systems Inc., Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Rotational Atherectomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All study patients had prestent IVUS imaging. IVUS-guided RA using either the OptiCross™ (Frequency 60 MHz, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) or Eagle Eye Platinum™ (Frequency 20 MHz, Philips, Rancho Cordova, CA, USA) system was used depending on the decision of the operator. OptiCross™ was used in 45% of patients in this study. Thirty-six (20%) patients IVUS was obtained prior RA. One hundred and sixty-four patients (80%) the IVUS catheter could not pass the lesion before RA. IVUS imaging obtained after RA.
An experienced intravascular imaging technician and experienced interventionists who were blinded to the clinical outcome reviewed the angiographic and IVUS imaging data. Intraobserver and interobserver variability yielded good concordance for the diagnosis of CN (k = 0.95 and k = 0.90, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

IVUS Imaging with Pullback Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IVUS imaging was performed using 60 MHz imaging catheters (OptiCross, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA and AltaView, Terumo, Ueda, Nagano, Japan). The OptiCross imaging catheter was pulled back at 0.5 or 1 mm/s and recorded at a frame rate of 30 frames/s using, whereas the AltaView catheter was pulled back at 3, 6, or 9 mm/s and recorded at 90 or 60 frames/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intravascular Ultrasound Phantom Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intravascular ultrasound was performed using an intracoronary imaging system (Opticross, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) operating with a transducer frequency of 40 MHz. A 0.018-in. diameter coronary guidewire (Hi-Torque Balance Middleweight, Abbott Cardiovascular, MN, USA) was passed through the water-filled phantom and fixed at either end. The imaging catheter was then loaded onto the coronary guidewire and positioned in the region of an iliac vessel. Images were acquired with an automated pullback speed of 1 mm/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Coronary Angiography and IVUS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis was performed using computer-based software (HeartII ver2.0.2.3, GADELIUS) before the procedure, after the procedure, and at follow-up by an independent physician who was blinded to patient and procedural characteristics. Optimal views of the lesions were obtained at baseline, and the same projection angle was used at follow-up. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD), reference diameter (RD), lesion length, and percent diameter stenosis (%DS) were measured. The acute gain was defined as the increase in MLD after PCI; late lumen loss was defined as the difference between the postprocedural MLD and the MLD at follow-up. Binary restenosis was defined as %DS >50% at follow-up. All IVUS procedures were performed using commercially available IVUS catheters (OptiCross™; Boston Scientific, or ViewIT®; Terumo) with automatic pull-back at a rate of 0.5 mm/s. At the narrowest cross-section area, lumen diameter, lumen area, vessel area, and %PA were analyzed. The %PA was defined as (vessel area-lumen area) × 100/vessel area. The incidence of hematoma, intimal dissection, and medial dissection was recorded. The IVUS images were analyzed using computerized planimetry software (echoPlaque; INDEC Medical Systems, Los Altos, CA, USA). All images were independently assessed by physicians who were blinded to patient and clinical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Rotational Atherectomy with Intravascular Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before procedural, all patients received an oral loading dose of 300 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel. During procedural, all patients received unfractionated heparin at a dose of 70–100 U/kg to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) > 300 s. In both groups, the choice of vascular access, burr size, IVUS/OCT was left at the operators’ discretion. The IVUS/OCT catheter was advanced beyond the target lesion using a commercially available IVUS/OCT system (40 MHz IVUS catheter; OptiCross, Boston Scientific. ILUMIEN C7-XR, Abbott). RA was performed by using the Rotablator (Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., Maple Grove, MN, USA). The burr size was selected to reach a burr/vessel ratio of 0.5–0.6. RA speed ranged between 150,000 and 180,000 rotation per minute. Each RA time was 10–15 s. During RA, A continuous intracoronary infusion of a cocktail with unfractionated heparin and nitroglycerin was employed. Success of RA was defined as complete expansion of balloon of target lesion after RA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated IVUS Pullback and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IVUS systems were automatically pulled back at a fixed speed as follows: 1) OptiCross (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), 1 mm/s (30 frames/s) and 2) AltaView (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), 3 or 9 mm/s (30 or 10 frames/s). The offline software [RadiAnt DICOM Viewer Ver. 2020.2 (Medixant, Poznan, Poland)] analyzed IVUS images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of LMCA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LMCA segments were examined with an IVUS system with automatic pullback at 0.5 mm/s (OptiCross, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA; Eagle Eye, Volcano Corp, Rancho Cordova, CA; TVC Insight, Infra‐ReDx, Burlington, MA) or 2.5 mm/sec (Kodama, Acist Medical, Eden Prairie, MN). IVUS imaging assessment was performed off‐line in fixed 0.5 mm intervals between the LMCA ostium and its distal bifurcation using dedicated software (QCU‐CMS, Leiden University Medical Center, LKEB, Division of Image Processing, version 4.69) by two dedicated academic intravascular imaging specialists, blinded to the vFFR results.
The proximal border of the LMCA, the ostium, was defined as the first frame, that contained a 360° luminal border of the LMCA.
The minimum lumen area (MLA) and external elastic membrane area were measured at the site within the LMCA coronary segment above the carina at which the lumen was smallest. The plaque burden at the MLA site was calculated as (external elastic membrane area–lumen area)/external elastic membrane area × 100 (%). Percent of area stenosis was also calculated as (reference lumen area − MLA)/reference lumen area×100 (%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Coronary Angiography and IVUS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative analysis was done by an experienced cardiologist. Quantitative angiography analysis was performed by standard techniques with automated edge-detection algorithms (CASS-5.2, Pie Medical, Maastricht, the Netherlands). IVUS imaging was performed after intracoronary administration of 0.2 mg nitroglycerin, using motorized transducer pullback (0.5 mm/s) and a commercial scanner (OptiCross, Boston Scientific, MA, USA). The IVUS data were stored on DVD, and quantitative IVUS analysis (EchoPlaque 3.0, Indec Systems, MountainView, CA, USA) was performed off-line by a single experienced investigator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!