The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rotateq

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

RotaTeq is a vaccine developed by Merck Group. It is a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, designed to protect against five different strains of the rotavirus. The vaccine is administered orally in a series of doses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using rotateq

1

Rotavirus Genome Sequencing from Acute Diarrhea

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool samples were collected from children less than 5 years old admitted to The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and Alice Springs Hospital or Royal Darwin Hospital Northern Territory, Australia, with acute diarrhea between December 2009 and September 2010. These samples were collected under the same inclusion criteria and were archived at -70°C in Melbourne. Rotavirus vaccine was part of the routine childhood vaccinations throughout the collection period. In Melbourne RotaTeq (Merck), a live human-bovine pentavalent reassortant vaccine is used, while Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline), a live attenuated human vaccine strain is used in the Northern Territory. 165 samples from the Northern Territory and 159 samples from Melbourne were randomly selected for this study. Of these, 44 samples from Northern Territory and 43 samples from Melbourne were sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rotavirus vaccine immunization schedules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This clinical trial utilized two rotavirus vaccines available in México and all Central American countries: RotaTeq™ (Merck & Co., Inc.; RV5), administered as a three-dose series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, and Rotarix™ (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals; RV1), given in a two-dose series at 2 and 4 months of age (5 (link)).
Rotarix™ was supplied by the National Vaccination Program, whereas RotaTeq™ was procured with funding allocated for the study. Each vaccine batch was meticulously documented by number and expiration date to ensure traceability.
The trial involved two groups that followed the standard schedules of RV1 and RV5. The other five groups received mixed schedules, combining doses of RV1 and RV5. To maintain the blinding integrity due to the differing doses between the Rotarix™ and RotaTeq™ vaccines, a placebo composed of 5% glucose solution was administered the third dose in the standard RV1 schedule group.
The specific vaccine schedules were as follows: Group 1 received RV1 + RV1 + placebo; Group 2 received RV5 + RV5 + RV5; Group 3 received RV1 + RV5 + RV5; Group 4 received RV5 + RV1 + RV1; Group 5 received RV5 + RV5 + RV1; Group 6 received RV5 + RV1 + RV5; and Group 7 received RV1 + RV5 + RV1 (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Rotavirus and Poliovirus Vaccines Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RV5 (RotaTeq®, lot WL00052861; Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ) is a ready-to-use solution of live reassortant rotaviruses, containing G1, G2, G3, G4, and P1A[8] which contains a minimum of 2.0 – 2.8 × 106 infectious units (IU) per individual reassortant dose, depending on the serotype, and not greater than 116 × 106 IU per aggregate dose. Each dose is supplied in a container consisting of a squeezable plastic dosing tube with a twist-off cap, allowing for direct oral administration.
DTaP-sIPV (Tetrabik®, lot JM-0021; BIKEN, Japan) is approved in Japan for the prevention of diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and acute poliomyelitis and used in this study. The DTaP-sIPV vaccine is supplied in 0.5 mL pre-filled syringes contained ≥ 14 IU of diphtheria toxoid, ≥ 9 IU of tetanus toxoid, ≥ 4 U (pertussis protective unit) of pertussis protective antigen, 1.5 D-antigen units (DU) of poliovirus type 1 (Sabin strains), 50 DU of poliovirus type 2 (Sabin strains), and 50 DU of poliovirus type 3 (Sabin strains) for subcutaneous injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rotavirus Strain Isolation and Propagation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human rotavirus WI61 strain was first isolated from an 18-month-old child with gastroenteritis in Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia in 1983.68 (link) Rotarix (RV1, GSK) and RotaTeq (RV5, Merck) are kindly shared by Dr. Kristen Ogden at Vanderbilt University. Murine rotavirus rD6/2-2 g strain was generated using an optimized, plasmid-based rotavirus reverse genetics system,69 (link) and tested for its genetic stability, intestinal replication, and virulence. African Green Monkey kidney epithelial cell line MA104 (CRL-2378.1) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in Medium 199 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (VWR), 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Rotavirus strains were propagated as described previously27 (link) and the titers of virus concentrate were determined in MA104 cells using a standard plaque assay.70 (link) Rotavirus inoculum was prepared by activating the stock with 5 μg/ml trypsin for 20 min at 37°C and diluting it into 50% CM with 10 μM Y-27632 up to the total volume of 100 μl, with 50 μg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rotavirus Vaccination Coverage in the U.S.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evidence for receipt of rotavirus vaccination was determined by using the Current Procedural Terminology codes 90680 and 90681 for the two rotavirus vaccines licensed in the U.S., Rotateq® (RV5, Merck and Co, Whitehouse Station, NJ) and Rotarix® (RV1, GSK Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium), respectively. Vaccination coverage was calculated using a numerator of the number of enrollees with one or more claims for rotavirus vaccination prior to hospitalization and a denominator of the number of children who were age-eligible for rotavirus vaccine at the time of hospitalization for rotavirus or AGE. To be age-eligible, children were required to be at least 2 months old at the time of hospitalization and to be born after June 2006. We calculated the mean and 95% CI for vaccination coverage for all children under 60 months and stratified by age group. Vaccination coverage was compared during pre-vaccine, early vaccine, and post-vaccine biennial rotavirus seasons with Mantel-Haenszel chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, using SAS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Oral Rotavirus Vaccine Immunization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were vaccinated with the commercial, oral, pentavalent, and live rotavirus vaccine RotaTeq® (Merck & Co., Inc.). Two sets of experiments with different immunization protocols were used. In the first set of experiments, mice were vaccinated with 30 μl of rotavirus vaccine and 108 bacterial cells or particles (high vaccine/low adjuvant immunization protocol). Mice that received only 30 μl of rotavirus vaccine were used as controls. In a second set of experiments, mice were vaccinated with 7.5 μl of rotavirus vaccine and 109 bacterial cells or particles (low vaccine/high adjuvant immunization protocol). Mice that received only 7.5 μl of rotavirus vaccine were used as controls. In both protocols, mice were immunized orally on days 0, 14 and 28. Seven days after the last immunization (day 35), the specific humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Defining Vaccine Completion for Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on ACIP's 2012 recommendations,24 we defined vaccine completion as the accrual of the required number of doses by a specific age (8, 18, and 24 months) regardless of timing of vaccine administration. Detailed lists of doses required at 8, 18, and 24 months are presented elsewhere.25 (link)
Completion of rotavirus vaccine and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (Hib) doses was assessed based on the product administered. For example, a child's vaccination for rotavirus was considered complete if 2 doses of Rotarix (GSK Vaccines) or 3 doses of RotaTeq (Merck & Co., Inc.) were administered. These algorithms are detailed in the published vaccine schedule.24
Although influenza and hepatitis A vaccines are also recommended by the ACIP, we did not assess them in the present study. The NIS data do not provide vaccination dates, thus we were not able to determine whether the seasonal influenza vaccine was administered during the influenza season, which is a criterion for administration. The second dose of hepatitis A vaccine should be administered between 6 and 18 months following the first dose at age 12 months or later; therefore, the second dose may be administered after 24 months—falling outside of our study period. As we could not capture appropriate completion and compliance of 2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine, it was not included in the present analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Rotavirus Diversity in Australia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stool samples were collected from children less than 5 years old admitted to The Royal Children׳s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and Alice Springs Hospital or Royal Darwin Hospital Northern Territory, Australia, with acute diarrhea between December 2009 and September 2010. These samples were collected under the same inclusion criteria and were archived at −70 
oC in Melbourne. Rotavirus vaccine was part of the routine childhood vaccinations throughout the collection period. In Melbourne RotaTeq (Merck), a live human-bovine pentavalent reassortant vaccine is used, while Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline), a live attenuated human vaccine strain is used in the Northern Territory. 165 samples from the Northern Territory and 159 samples from Melbourne were randomly selected for this study. Of these, 44 samples from Northern Territory and 43 samples from Melbourne were sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Evaluation of Rotavirus Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four vaccine scenarios were compared with a control (ie, no vaccine). First, vaccination with Rotarix, a live monovalent human attenuated oral rotavirus vaccine (RV1) manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (Belgium). Rotarix presentation is a liquid single-dose pack in a plastic tube. Two doses of Rotarix are required for full immunisation. Second, vaccination with Rotateq (for non-Gavi countries only), a live pentavalent, human–bovine reassortant vaccine (RV5) manufactured by Merck & Co (Kenilworth, NJ, USA). Rotateq presentation is a liquid single-dose pack in a plastic tube. Three doses of Rotateq are required for full immunisation. Rotateq was not considered as a comparator for the Gavi-eligible countries because the manufacturer has withdrawn supplies to Gavi countries.9 Third, vaccination with Rotavac, a live monovalent human-bovine liquid frozen oral rotavirus vaccine (RV1), manufactured by Bharat Biotech (Hyderabad, India). Rotavac presentation is a liquid (frozen), five-dose pack in a vial. Three doses of Rotavac are required for full immunisation. Fourth, vaccination with Rotasiil, a live pentavalent bovine-human reassortant oral rotavirus vaccine (RV5), manufactured by the Serum Institute (Pune, India). Rotasiil presentation is in lyophilised form, a two-dose pack in a vial. Three doses of Rotasiil are required for full immunisation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Rotavirus Vaccine Protocol Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rotarix is a trademark of the GSK group of companies.
Rotateq is a trademark of Merck and Co., USA.
RotaClone is a trademark of Meridian Bioscience, Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!