The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss for windows v 27

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS for Windows v. 27 is a statistical software package that provides advanced analytical capabilities. It offers a range of statistical procedures for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, and multivariate techniques. The software is designed to handle a variety of data types and formats, and it provides a user-friendly interface for data management, analysis, and visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

15 protocols using spss for windows v 27

1

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows v. 27 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as either mean ± SD or interquartile ranges when appropriate. The normal distribution was verified by using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical variables were presented as either absolute number or percentages. Post hoc analysis was performed with the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. Student’s t-test correlation was used to evaluate the relationships between continuous variables.
The inter-operator and intra-operator variability and the Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer correlation.
Statistical significance was defined as p value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows v. 27 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as either mean ± SD or interquartile ranges when appropriate. The normal distribution was verified by using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical variables were presented as either absolute number or percentages. Post hoc analysis was performed with the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. Student’s t-test correlation was used to evaluate the relationships between continuous variables.
The inter-operator and intra-operator variability and the Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer correlation.
Statistical significance was defined as p value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Climate Change

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were introduced and analysed using SPSS for Windows v.27. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the KAP about CC. The results were presented using percentages, frequency, tables and graphs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating miRNA Prognostic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows v. 27.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated by a nonparametric measure (Spearman rank sum analysis). Group comparisons were analyzed by a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U test). All tests of significance were two-sided and p values of ≤0.05 were considered significant. To evaluate the potential of a select group of miRNAs as prognostic markers, we calculated the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve and the ROC AUC (Area Under the Curve) for a multivariate logistic regression model using normalized miRNA expression values individually and in combination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Survival Analysis of Biomarkers in Clinical Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Associations between continuous variables were assessed using Spearman rank correlation test. Paired t-tests were used to assess differences in ALC and RDW values before vs. after initiation of treatments. Survival analysis methods, including log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models, were used to assess mortality across biomarker levels while adjusting for covariates of interest. Cut points for RDW and ALC in survival analyses (1.2 k/cmm for ALC and 14.5% for RDW) were based upon prior cohort survival analyses14 (link),15 (link). All pvalues presented are two-sided and unadjusted. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows v. 27.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York) and R Statistical Software v 4.0.5 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Survival Analysis of MRE11 Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows v.27.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Survival analysis was performed on the entire cohort. Further subgroup analysis was performed using early tumor stage and low-grade tumor as covariates. MRE11 protein expression in samples from the cancer core and periphery was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox’s proportional hazard ratio (HR) survival modeling. Sex, age, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, differentiation, lymph node (LN) involvement, metastasis stage at diagnosis, LVI/PNI, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments were included as covariates. The statistical significance of results from univariate and multivariate analyses was determined using the Mann–Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Perioperative COVID-19 Outcomes Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcome measures were nosocomial COVID-19 infection and postoperative complications. Electronic patient records were then searched based on unique patient identifier. This gave access to all investigations, records of hospital admissions and discharge, electronic correspondence from outpatient clinic, operation notes, and GP letters. The following information was searched for: age; sex; BMI; ASA; type of anaesthetic; type of operation; COVID-19 swab results; and any readmission or complication. For each patient, a search of all COVID-19 nasal swabs was done. This included preoperative screening and any subsequent tests done either as inpatient or in community post discharge. All patients have minimum eight weeks’ follow-up, after which point any positive COVID-19 swab is not deemed to be related to their hospital admission. The rationale for this is that it will be two weeks from their six-week follow-up appointment, and beyond the incubation period should they be exposed at this appointment.
Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows v. 27 (IBM, USA) and non-parametric Fisher’s exact test was employed as most of the data were categorical in nature. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Investigating Occlusion Effects on Arterial Flow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows v.27 (IBM Corporation, Somers, NY, USA). Mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) values were generated for all outcome measures. Paired samples t-tests were used to test for differences in post-occlusion, pre-exercise changes between the occlusion conditions, including arterial flow and heart rate. A standardized mean effect size (ES) calculated as (MBTF − MTRA/SDBTF) for between-group comparisons, whereas within-conditions were calculated as (MPost − MPre/SDPre), and qualitatively described as small, moderate, and large (ES = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively) [24 ]. Normality for these variables was determined using the Shapiro Wilk test and visual inspection of residual histograms and QQ-plots. When the normality assumption was violated (‡), the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.
Repeated measures ANOVAs were used for the other continuous variables to compare raw values and change scores of measures between- and within- conditions. Sphericity was tested using Mauchly’s W. If sphericity was violated, the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis independent samples test was used. If a main effect was found, a post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction was utilized to determine between-condition differences. Statistical significance was indicated using an α level of p < 0.05 and was used for all tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cortisol and Glucose Correlation Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics (mean, SD, median, and ranges) were used to describe the population characteristics. The Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by a Mann-Whitney U test, Student’s t-test, or Chi square test were used to compare differences between groups, as appropriate. Correlations between parameters were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. The level of statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis, including sample size calculation was conducted using IBM SPSS for Windows v27. Using a 2-sided test, 5% significance level test (α = 0.05) with power 80% power (β = 0.2), the required sample size is approximate 198 to detect Spearman Rank order of 0.2 between cortisol and glucose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Intervention Outcomes Using SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM, Armonk, New York’s SPSS for Windows (V.27) was used to evaluate all the data. A comparison of baseline and demographic data was made between both groups. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine if the acquired data were normal. The two-way repeated ANOVA was used to evaluate changes within and between groups. The 95% confidence interval (CI) is presented with the adjusted mean differences within and between groups. Furthermore, the effect size between the intervention and control group was calculated using partial eta squared value; a p~<0.05 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!