The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using anti cd45 apc efluor 780 clone 30 f11

1

Infiltrating Brain Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six days post-infection, mice were exsanguinated and perfused as above; brains were harvested and homogenized in RPMI media-containing 0.5 mg/mL collagenase (Gibco LifeTechnologies), 0.01 mg/mL DNAse I (Roche) and 2 mM EDTA. Infiltrating cells were separated on a 33.3 % Percoll solution. Cells were stained for flow cytometry analyses with the following; Zombie Aqua Dye-V500 (BioLegend), anti-CD45-APC-eFluor780 (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), anti-CD4-PerCP Cyanine5.5 (clone RM4-5, eBioscience), anti-CD8alpha-PE (clone 53-6.7, eBioscience), anti-TCRbeta-FITC (clone H57-597, eBioscience), anti-CD19-BV421 (clone 6D5, BioLegend), F4/80-eFluor450 (clone BM8, eBioscience), anti-CD11b-APC (clone M1/70, eBioscience), anti-CD11c-PerCP Cyanine5.5 (clone N418, eBioscience), anti-Ly6C-PE (clone HK1.4, eBioscience), and anti-Ly6G-FITC (clone 1A8, BioLegend). Leukocytes were gated as CD45hi cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Eosinophil-Mediated Mitochondrial ROS in Osteoclasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMMs from BALB/c WT mice were cultured in 1 × 106 cells/well in 1 mL/well osteoclast medium with supplements on 24-well plates at 37 °C and 5.5% CO2. BMMs were stimulated at day 0 of culture for 48 h with eosinophils (1:1 Eos/BMMs ratio), eosinophil supernatant (1:2 dilution), 10 µg/mL of MPO, and 0.05–0.1 µg/mL of EPX compared with unstimulated control. At day 2, the cells were detached from the plate by accutase and stained with MitoSOXTM Red (Invitrogen; Cat# M36008) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Afterwards, the cells were incubated with the following antibodies: anti-CD45 APC-eFluor™ 780 (clone 30-F11; 1:800; eBioscience; Cat# 47-0451-82), anti-CD11b FITC (clone M1/70; 1:400; BD Pharmingen; Cat# 557396), and anti-CD115 (CSF-1R) Brilliant Violet 421™ (clone AFS98; 1:800; BioLegend; Cat# 135513) in 1x PBS in the dark at 4 °C for 20 min. After washing, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer (1x PBS with 2% FBS and 5 mM EDTA) for flow cytometric analyses. Flow cytometry was performed on the GalliosTM flow cytometer (Beckman Counter). Flow cytometry data were analyzed by Kaluza 2.1 (Beckman Counter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Eosinophil Isolation and Supernatant Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eosinophils were sorted from the blood and BM of IL-5tg/4get mice as described previously19 . The blood was lysed twice with 10 mL RCL buffer. BM cells were flushed out from the femur and tibia. Cells from blood and BM were pooled and put through 70 µm cell strainers. Cells were stained with anti-CD45 APC-eFluor™ 780 (clone 30-F11; 1:800; eBioscience; Cat# 47-0451-82), anti-CD125 (IL-5Rα) APC (clone REA343; 1:100; Miltenyi Biotec; Cat# 130-118-561), and anti-Siglec-F PE (clone E50-2440; 1:400; BD Pharmingen; Cat# 562068) in 1x PBS for 20 min in the dark at 4 °C. After washing, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer for sorting on MoFlo Astrios EQ (Beckman Counter). CD45+ CD125 int Siglec-F + granulocytes were sorted into 1x PBS with 2% FBS for in vitro experiments. Besides, 2 × 106/mL sorted eosinophils were cultured for 48 h in αMEM and GlutaMAX (Gibco; Cat# 32571028) with 10% FBS (Gibco; Cat# A5256701) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco; Cat# 15140122) at 37 °C and 5.5% CO2 to generate eosinophil supernatant. After culture, the supernatant was separated from the cells by centrifugation and stored at −80 °C. The viability of the cultured eosinophils after 48 h was analyzed by flow cytometry with DAPI (Roche; Cat# 10236276001).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!