The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dneasy blood and tissue kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit is a laboratory tool designed for the rapid and efficient purification of DNA from a variety of sample types, including blood, tissue, and cultured cells. The kit utilizes a spin-column format to facilitate the isolation of high-quality genomic DNA, which can then be used in a wide range of downstream applications, such as PCR, sequencing, and genotyping.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using dneasy blood and tissue kit

1

High-Quality Genomic DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High molecular weight genomic DNA was extracted from all samples with either the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit or the BioSprint 96 DNA Blood Kit in conjunction with a Thermo Scientific KingFisher Flex Purification platform, in both cases following instructions provided by the manufacturer. We quantified DNA concentration with either PicoGreen or Qubit 2.0 fluorometry and standardized samples to 5 ng/μl. Only high‐quality DNA samples, as determined by the presence of a high molecular weight band on a 1% agarose gel, were retained for sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Placental Cell DNA Genotyping and CNV Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated from placental cell pellets from two first trimester and three term placentae (Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit) and quantified (Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kits, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA was genotyped using Illumina InfiniumOmni2-5-8v1-4 BeadChips (∼2,381,000 markers with a median spacing of 0.65 kb) at the IGM Genomics Center at UC San Diego. Samples were called in GenomeStudio (Illumina) with an average overall call rate of 99.4%. The CTB sample from one patient (1,391) was removed from the analysis due to a low call rate (91.3%). CNVs were identified using the cnvPartition Plug-in (v.3.2.0) in GenomeStudio. The cnvPartition confidence threshold was set at 100, with a minimum number of SNPs per CNV region of 10. The R (v.3.6.1) package, allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors (ASCAT; v.2.5.2; Van Loo et al., 2010 (link)), was used to estimate the ploidy of EVT samples. LogR ratios and BAF values were exported from GenomeStudio, and no GC wave correction was performed. EVT samples were considered “tumor” samples, and matched UC-MSCs were used as “reference” samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping TP53 P72R Variant in White Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA of white blood cells was isolated by using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For genotyping of the TP53 P72R SNP (rs1042522) 15–50 ng of DNA was amplified using M13 tailed primers spanning exon 4 (TP53_ex4_F: tgagtggatccattggaaggg, TP53_ex4_R: tccaaacaaaagaaatgcagggg) and the HotstarTaq PCR Mastermix (5 units/µl) (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). After purifying 5 µl of the PCR products (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using enzymatic ExoSAP-ITTM cleanup, 1 µl was used for Sanger sequencing. To this end, templates were prepared using 0.5 µl BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and M13 universal primers (M13_F: CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC, M13_R: GGATAACAATTTCACACAGG). Sequencing reactions were purified using with SephadexTM G-50 Superfine (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) and sequenced on an ABI 3730 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Data analysis was performed using SeqScape Software v3.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Out of 20 patients, 14 were homozygous for the R72 variant, five were heterozygous for the P72 variant and one patient was homozygous for the P72 variant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Sampling Across Sericornis Distributions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our data set comprised 81 ingroup taxa (57 S. trivirgatus sensu lato and 24 S. guttula; Table S1). We sampled broadly across the distributions of S. guttula and S. trivirgatus (Table S1, Figure 1), including all eight subspecies of S. trivirgatus (Clements et al., 2019; del Hoyo & Collar, 2016; Dickinson & Christidis, 2014). All mainland New Guinea samples were from Papua New Guinea because we lacked tissue samples from the west, but for simplicity, we refer to this population as “Mainland New Guinea.” We rooted phylogenetic analyses to Myiagra ruficollis (sequenced for this study), but used a more closely related outgroup, Symposiachrus verticalis—from Moyle et al. (2016)—for analyses of gene flow. Most samples were derived from frozen or ethanol‐preserved, specimen‐vouchered tissues; however, three samples of Indonesian island populations of S. trivirgatus were sourced from specimen toepad clippings (Table S1). For tissue‐derived libraries, we extracted genomic DNA following standard protocols with a Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit and quantified extracts with a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spiked DNA Samples for Variant Calling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spiked samples were created by combining DNA from multiple human cell lines. Whole genomic DNA derived from B-lymphocytes was purchased from Coriell Institute corresponding to samples NA12878 and NA19129. Additionally, whole genomic DNA was extracted from cultured tumor cells lines A549, NCI-H1975, and MDA-MB-231 (ATCC) using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (catalog number 69504) followed by qPCR quantification using the ThermoFisher RNase P assay (catalog number 4316831). NA19129 was used as the background sample into which the other four samples were spiked. Two different spike levels were created based on DNA concentrations. A projected 1% spike sample was created such that 96% of the DNA mass corresponded to NA19129 and 1% corresponded to each of the four spiked cell lines (S1 Fig). This sample was then diluted 3:1 with NA19129 such that a projected 99% of the DNA corresponded to NA19129 and 0.25% corresponded to each of the four spiked cell lines. A control sample of pure NA19129 was created in order to quantize the error background for ERASE-Seq variant calling. Samples of pure NA12878, MDA-MB-231, NCI-H1975, and A549 were created to determine true variants present in the cell lines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping and Clonal Expansion Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For genotyping, we first determined whether the tag was inserted into the target locus using PCR. Clones were expanded by splitting cells from individual colonies in 96-well plates into 48-well plates, and subsequently into 24-well plates. The target locus was amplified directly from the cells using the Phire Plant Direct PCR mastermix (ThermoFisher Scientific) in three junction PCR reactions as per manufacturer's protocols. The primers used for these reactions are listed in electronic supplementary material, table S3. The three PCR reactions were designed to amplify the wild-type (WT) locus as well as the left and right junctions of the integration sites. Touchdown PCR was used to improve the quality of the PCR products. Six to twelve positive clones were then expanded into 10 cm dishes for further genotyping. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and tissue kit, then used to amplify the target locus with Phusion polymerase (ThermoFisher Scientific) by touchdown PCR. The genotype was verified by extracting PCR products and sequencing the tagged and untagged alleles. When possible, homozygous clones carrying only tagged alleles were selected. Alternatively, heterozygous clones carrying a tagged allele and a wild-type allele were selected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive TCR Sequencing in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCR sequencing was carried out by Adaptive Biotechnologies according to standard company protocols. Experimentally, mice from each group were sacrificed and blood draw was obtained through cardiac puncture. Isolation of genomic DNA was performed in the laboratory using a Quiagen DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit and gDNA quality and concentration was confirmed using a Nano‐Drop fluorimeter (Thermo). Isolated gDNA was then sent to Adaptive headquarters where proprietary primer sets were utilized to isolate and amplify the TCRB gene locus within in mouse genome. Sequencing of the resulting cDNA libraries was performed at Adaptive's facility and PCR duplication bias was eliminated using established company quality controls. Both raw and quantified data were transferred back to the laboratory using Adaptive's data analysis cloud. Raw data were analyzed using MiXCR (Bolotin et al., 2015 (link)) while quantified data were mined and plotting using R (version 4.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PCR-Based Genotyping Protocol for Tagged Alleles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The first step of genotyping involved determining whether the tag was inserted into the locus using PCR. Clones were expanded by splitting cells from individual colonies into 48-well plates, and subsequently into 24-well plates. At this stage cells were harvested for PCR. The target locus was amplified using the Phire Plant Direct PCR mastermix (Thermo Fischer Scientific) in three junction PCR reactions as per manufacturer's protocols. The primers used for these reactions are listed in Table S3. The three PCR reactions were designed to amplify the WT locus as well as the left and right junctions of the integration sites, and touchdown PCR was used to improve the quality of the product. 6-12 positive clones were then expanded into 10 cm dishes for sequencing and further use. When possible, homozygous clones carrying only tagged alleles were selected.
Alternatively, heterozygous clones carrying a tagged allele and a WT allele were selected.
Genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and tissue kit, then used to amplify the target locus with Phusion polymerase (Thermo Fischer Scientific) as per manufacturer's instructions by touchdown PCR. The genotype was verified by extracting PCR products and sequencing the tagged and non-tagged alleles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Extraction from Nematode Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nematode isolates of G. pallida, G. rostochiensis, G. tabacum, Heterodera sp. and different mixtures of G. pallida/G. rostochiensis (Table 1) were obtained at the Nematology lab of INIAV (NemaINIAV, Oeiras, Portugal).
The extraction of total DNA was always conducted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was quantified using the thermo-NANODROP 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and stored at −20 °C until further use. DNA extracts were used directly for the PCR reactions without any additional purification step. Total DNA extraction, purification and conservation was performed as described in Camacho et al. [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genome-wide DNA Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from 1×106 cells (QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit), quantified (Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kits, Life Technologies), quality controlled (DNA1000 Kit and BioAnalyzer 2100, Agilent), and bisulfite converted (EZ DNA Methylation Kit, Zymo Research) according to each manufacturer's protocol. Bisulfite-converted DNA was hybridized to Infinium-450 BeadChips (Illumina) and scanned with an iScan (Illumina). Quality control was performed in GenomeStudio. HumanMethylation450 data were normalized using SWAN (Maksimovic et al., 2012 (link)) and differential methylation was identified using Limma (Smyth, 2004 (link)). Hierarchical clustering was performed using Cluster, with Euclidian distance and complete linkage. Functional enrichments were executed in GREAT (McLean et al., 2010 (link)) using default settings. DNA methylation data have been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE63592.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!