The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbitrap lumos

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Orbitrap Lumos is a high-resolution mass spectrometer designed for analytical research. It utilizes Orbitrap technology to provide accurate mass measurements and detailed structural information about molecular compounds. The Orbitrap Lumos offers high-performance capabilities for a variety of applications in the field of analytical chemistry.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using orbitrap lumos

1

Peptide Analysis by Nanospray LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were re-dissolved in solvent A (A: 0.1% formic acid in water) and on-line nanospray LC-MS/MS was performed for analysis on an Orbitrap Lumos coupled to EASY-nLC 1200 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). 4 μL peptide sample was loaded onto analytical column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 75 μm × 25 cm) and eluted with 120-minute gradient from 4% to 32% B (B: 0.1% formic acid in ACN). We set the column flow rate at 300 nL/min and the capillary voltage at 2 kV. We ran the mass spectrometer under DDA mode with MS and MS/MS mode automatically switched. The parameters were as follows: MS: scan range (m/z) = 350 to 1500; resolution = 60,000; AGC target = 4e5; maximum injection time = 50 ms; dynamic exclusion = 30 second; HCD-MS/MS: resolution = 15,000; AGC target = 5e4; maximum injection time = 38 ms; collision energy = 32.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Proteomic Analysis by Nano-LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were re-dissolved in 30 μL solvent A (A: 0.1% formic acid in water). 9μL of each was taken, added with 1μL 10 × iRT peptide, mixed, seperated with nano-LC, and finally analyzed by on-line nanospray LC-MS/MS on an Orbitrap Lumos coupled to EASY-nLC 1200 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). 4 μL peptide sample was loaded onto analytical column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 75 μm × 25 cm) and eluted with 120-minute gradient from 4% to 32% B (B: 0.1% formic acid in ACN). We set the column flow rate at 300 nL/min and the capillary voltage at 2 kV. We ran the mass spectrometer under DIA mode with MS and MS/MS mode automatically switched. The parameters were as follows: MS: scan range (m/z) = 350 to 1350; resolution = 120,000; AGC target = 4e5; maximum injection time = 50 ms; HCD-MS/MS: resolution = 30,000; AGC target = 1e6; collision energy = 32; 60 variable Isolation windows was set with each window overlapped 1 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Proteomics of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2 mg E. coli cell pellets were lysed in 8 M urea using pulsed sonication. The supernatant was extracted, and then sequentially reduced, alkylated, and digested overnight with trypsin. The protein digests were labelled with 10-plex Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) [18 (link)]. Labelled protein digests were then pooled, and desalted. High-pH reverse phase liquid chromatography (bRPLC) [19 (link)] was carried out to separate the peptide mixture into 24 fractions. Each fraction was analyzed on an Orbitrap Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based nanoLCMS system.
Peptide and protein IDs were assigned by searching the resulting LCMS raw data against the Uniprot E. coli database supplemented with the Bax-Intein-CBD sequence using the Sequest HT algorithm. Quantitation values were extracted using the Proteome Discoverer 2.2 platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 10 channels’ sample amounts were normalized using the total report ion intensities of their corresponding channels. Individual proteins were quantified based on the normalized report ion intensities of their unique peptides.
We used 2-fold cutoff and t-test p values less than 0.05 to select for changed proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

FAIMS-Enabled Orbitrap MS Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples (~ 1 µg for each fraction) were loaded and eluted by an Easy-nLC 1200 (Thermo Scientific) with an in-house packed 15 cm, 150 μm i.d. capillary column with 1.7 μm CSH (Water’s) over a 35 min gradient. Mass spectrometry was performed with a high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) Pro front-end equipped Orbitrap Lumos (Thermo) in positive ion mode using data-dependent acquisition with 1 s top speed cycles for each FAIMS compensative voltage. Each cycle consisted of one full MS scan followed by as many MS/MS events that could fit within the given 1 s cycle time limit. MS scans were collected at a resolution of 120,000 (410–1600 m/z range, 4 × 10^5 AGC, 50 ms maximum ion injection time, FAIMS compensative voltage of -45 and -65). Only precursors with charge states between 2 + and 5 + were selected for MS/MS. All higher energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD) MS/MS spectra were acquired at a resolution of 50,000 (0.7 m/z isolation width, 35% collision energy, 1 × 10^5 AGC target, 86 ms maximum ion time). Dynamic exclusion was set to exclude previously sequenced peaks for 30 s within a 10-ppm isolation window.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanoflow LC-MS/MS Proteomic Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used nanoflow LC-MS/MS using Orbitrap Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled to an Agilent 1290 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies). Trap column of 20 mm × 100 μm inner diameter (ReproSil C18, Dr Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany) was used followed by a 40 cm × 50 μm inner diameter analytical column (ReproSil Pur C18-AQ (Dr Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany)). Both columns were packed in-house. Trapping was done at 5 μl/min in 0.1 M acetic acid in H2O for 10 min, and the analytical separation was done at 300 nl/min for 2 h by increasing the concentration of 0.1 M acetic acid in 80% acetonitrile (v/v). The mass spectrometer was operated in a data-dependent mode, automatically switching between MS and MS/MS. Full-scan MS spectra were acquired in the Orbitrap from m/z 350–1500 with a resolution of 60,000 FHMW, automatic gain control (AGC) target of 200,000 and maximum injection time of 50 ms. Ten most intense precursors at a threshold above 5000 were selected with an isolation window of 1.2 Da after accumulation to a target value of 30,000 (maximum injection time was 115 ms). Fragmentation was carried out using higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with collision energy of 38% and activation time of 0.1 ms. Fragment ion analysis was performed on Orbitrap with resolution of 60,000 FHMW and a low mass cut-off setting of 120 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Metabolomic and Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolome analyses were performed on a Thermo Ultimate RS 3000 coupled online to a Q-Exactive hybrid quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a heated electrospray ionization probe (HESI II). The MS was calibrated by Thermo calmix (Pierce™ calibration solutions in both polarities. Lipidome analysis was performed on an Ultimate RS 3000 UHPLC (Thermo Fisher), coupled online to a TimsTOF Pro Quadrupole Time of Flight (Q-TOF) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an Apollo II electrospray ionization (ESI) probe. Proteomics analysis used a nanoLC coupled to a tribrid Orbitrap Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen). Methods were performed as described previously [27 (link)–29 (link)]. Detailed mass spectrometry conditions and raw data alignment, filtering, and annotation parameters are described in (Additional file 1). For the assessment of repeatability and instrument stability over time, a QC strategy was applied. A quality control (QC) sample was prepared by pooling the same aliquot (10 µL) from each sample. Samples were injected in randomized order, and blank samples were injected regularly and used to assess carryover and exclude background signals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lipid Profiling of HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation and analysis were performed as previously described (84 (link)). Briefly, frozen cell pellets (1 million cells) were suspended in 500 μl PBS containing 200 μM EDTA and 10 μM t-butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), extracted with 1.5 ml chloroform methanol (2:1), concentrated and dissolved in 100 μl 10% acetonitrile in isopropanol containing 10 mM ammonium formate, separated by UHPLC at 300 μl/min in a Phenomenex Kinetex C18 2.1 × 100 mm, 100A, 1.7 μm maintained at 55 °C with gradient elution, and analyzed on a Thermo Orbitrap Lumos. The data was analyzed by Thermo Lipid Search v4.2. Only lipids with a p value <0.05 and an identification score of A or B were selected in the final results. The peak area of all lipids was normalized to POPC, the most intense lipid in HepG2 cells. The data for each cell line was reported as ratios to WT cells (Table 2). A complete analysis of all lipids in the cell lines is available upon request.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry data was acquired using an Orbitrap Lumos for all experiments apart from 6 fractions from the pSILAC_18 experiment, where an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer was used instead (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). In both cases, an Ultimate 3000 RSLC nano UHPLC equipped with a 300 μm ID x 5 mm Acclaim PepMap μ-Precolumn (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a 75 μm ID x 50 cm 2.1 μm particle Acclaim PepMap RSLC analytical column was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Proteomics of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2 mg E. coli cell pellets were lysed in 8 M urea using pulsed sonication. The supernatant was extracted, and then sequentially reduced, alkylated, and digested overnight with trypsin. The protein digests were labelled with 10-plex Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA) [18 (link)]. Labelled protein digests were then pooled, and desalted. High-pH reverse phase liquid chromatography (bRPLC) [19 (link)] was carried out to separate the peptide mixture into 24 fractions. Each fraction was analyzed on an Orbitrap Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based nanoLCMS system.
Peptide and protein IDs were assigned by searching the resulting LCMS raw data against the Uniprot E. coli database supplemented with the Bax-Intein-CBD sequence using the Sequest HT algorithm. Quantitation values were extracted using the Proteome Discoverer 2.2 platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 10 channels’ sample amounts were normalized using the total report ion intensities of their corresponding channels. Individual proteins were quantified based on the normalized report ion intensities of their unique peptides.
We used 2-fold cutoff and t-test p values less than 0.05 to select for changed proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

FAIMS-Enabled Metabolomic and Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SMAD analysis was performed on an Orbitrap Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) mass spectrometer coupled with the FAIMS Pro Interface. Different compensation voltages were applied for metabolome (−5V to −40V in steps of 5V) and proteome (−30V to −80V in steps of 10V) analysis. A nano-ESI source (“Nanospray Flex”) and LOTUS nESI emitters from Fossiliontech were used for ionization. The ultimate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to control automated sample loading, flow rate, and mobile phase composition. Flow rate was maintained at 1.4ul/min at the first 0.5 min for transferring samples to nano emitter and then maintained a 0.3ul/min flowrate to the end of the acquisition. Mobile phase composition is ACN/H2O (70:30) in 0.1% formic acid (FA) for the whole acquisition process. Data acquisition was conducted at positive mode with 2200V. AGC was set at 100% and ion injection time was set at auto. For proteome acquisition, targeted MS2 mode was used for each compensation voltage from −30 V to −80 V in a step of 10V. For metabolome acquisition, tSIM mode with a quadrupole window of 50da was used to scan full m/z range from 100 to 1100 for each compensation voltage from −5V to −40 V in a step of 5V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!