The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

45 protocols using pdest22

1

Yeast Transformation and Beta-Galactosidase Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast transformation and beta-galactosidase assays were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Clontech). Full-length cDNAs for WUS, HAM1, HAM2, HAM3, and HAM4 were cloned into pENTR/D/TOPOor pCR8 (Invitrogen), and then WUS cDNA was Gateway cloned to pDEST32, and HAM1, HAM2, HAM3, and HAM4 cDNAs were Gateway cloned into pDEST22 using standard LR reactions (Invitrogen). All of the deletion derivatives for WUS or HAM1 were generated through overlapping PCR with the primers listed in methods, cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO or pCR8, and cloned into pDEST32 or pDEST22 through LR recombination (Invitrogen). All clones were sequenced to confirm they were in-frame and the corresponding deletions before being transformed into yeast. The bait and prey vectors were transformed into yeast strain MaV203, and three single transformed colonies per genotype were used as triplicate for the LacZ liquid assay in 96 Deep well plates (Thermo) and OD reading was recorded in 96-well plate reader (Tecan). The LacZ activity was calculated as (OD420×1000)/(OD600 × cell volume in μl × assay time in minutes) following the yeast two hybrid handbook (Clontech), including a standard error from three biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genome-wide Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the Gal4-based Y2H screen, full-length ORFs of S. pneumoniae were shuttled from pENTR221 entry clones (Pathogen Functional Genomics Resource Center [PFGRC]; formerly at the J. Craig Venter Institute [JCVI], Rockville, MD; now maintained by BEI]) into Y2H bait plasmid pDEST22 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using Gateway cloning.
Individual bait plasmids were transformed into haploid yeast strain CG-1945 and prey plasmids into Y187 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) as described previously (39 (link)).
The prey library was created by growing all plasmid strains of the S. pneumoniae entry clone library individually in selective Luria Broth (LB) medium, followed by pooling and plasmid isolation. The resulting entry clone plasmid pool was shuttled into the pGADT7g and pDEST22 prey plasmids by the use of a Gateway LR reaction (Invitrogen). The reaction mixture was then transformed into electrocompetent E. coli DH10B (ElectroMAX; Invitrogen) and grown in selective LB medium, and the plasmids were isolated. Plasmid pools were then transformed into Y187 as described previously (40 (link)) and spread onto 24-by-24-cm dishes containing Synthetic Defined (SD) agar. Finally, all colonies were scratched from the plates, resuspended in 25% glycerol, and stored as 50-μl aliquots at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Yeast Transformation and Beta-Galactosidase Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast transformation and beta-galactosidase assays were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Clontech). Full-length cDNAs for WUS, HAM1, HAM2, HAM3, and HAM4 were cloned into pENTR/D/TOPOor pCR8 (Invitrogen), and then WUS cDNA was Gateway cloned to pDEST32, and HAM1, HAM2, HAM3, and HAM4 cDNAs were Gateway cloned into pDEST22 using standard LR reactions (Invitrogen). All of the deletion derivatives for WUS or HAM1 were generated through overlapping PCR with the primers listed in methods, cloned into pENTR/D-TOPO or pCR8, and cloned into pDEST32 or pDEST22 through LR recombination (Invitrogen). All clones were sequenced to confirm they were in-frame and the corresponding deletions before being transformed into yeast. The bait and prey vectors were transformed into yeast strain MaV203, and three single transformed colonies per genotype were used as triplicate for the LacZ liquid assay in 96 Deep well plates (Thermo) and OD reading was recorded in 96-well plate reader (Tecan). The LacZ activity was calculated as (OD420×1000)/(OD600 × cell volume in μl × assay time in minutes) following the yeast two hybrid handbook (Clontech), including a standard error from three biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Y1H reporter strain was obtained as described (Deplancke et al., 2006) .
bZIP17 and bZIP60 full-length and truncated ORFs were cloned into pDEST22 (Invitrogen), to create a fusion with the GAL4 activation domain. TSAR1 and TSAR2 recombined with the destination vector pDEST22 (Invitrogen) had previously been obtained by (Mertens et al., 2016a) . Empty pDEST22 was used as negative control.
The yeast reporter strain was transformed with the preys followed by verification of growth on SD medium lacking His and Trp plates with and without 20 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole after an incubation period of 6 d at 30°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cloning and Subcloning of Pea Symbiotic Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Full-length PsDELLA1, PsKNOX3, and PsBELL1 coding sequences were obtained by amplification of cDNA cv. Finale or cv. Sparkle using specific PCR primer pairs flanking with attB1 and attB2 sequences or CACC in forward primer (Supplementary Table S2) for subsequent cloning in pDONR221 or pENTRY-TOPO vectors (Thermo Fisher scientific, United States) according to manufacturer’s protocol.
At the next stage they were finally subcloned into the destination vectors pDEST22 (PREY) or pDEST32 (BAIT) vectors using the LR clonase enzyme (Thermo Fisher scientific). All verified constructs were transferred into MaV203 yeast strain (Thermo Fisher scientific).
Full-length PsNSP2 and PsIPD3/CYCLOPS coding sequences or partial coding sequences upto stop-codon corresponding to those in RisNod14, E69 nsp2 (sym7) or SGEFix--5 [ipd3/cyclops (sym33)] mutants were obtained by amplification of cDNA cv. Finale or Sparkle using specific PCR primer pairs flanking with attB1 and attB2 sequences followed by cloning into pDEST22 (PREY) or pDEST32 (BAIT) vectors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening for Autophagy Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The entry clone containing FYVE3 cDNA was recombined with the destination vector pDEST22 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) via the LR Clonase II reaction. The resulting pDEST22-FYVE3 and pDEST32 expression vectors for bait proteins fused to SAR1B, SAR1C, ATG8A, ATG8E, ATG8F, ATG8I, ATG18A and FYVE2 (Kim et al., 2022 (link)) were used for transformation of the AH109 strain and Y187 strain through the Yeastmaker Yeast Transformation System 2 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). To determine protein interaction, yeast colonies isolated from Trp- and Leu- deficient medium were transferred to Trp-, Leu-, and His- deficient medium containing 0 and 1 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Yeast Two-Hybrid Protein Interaction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Y2H analysis was performed as previously described [17 (link)]. Plasmids used in the experiments were based on pDEST22 and pDEST32 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and are listed in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis of GhMYB4 and GhMYB66

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the interaction between GhMYB4 and GhMYB66 protein, a bait vector carrying the full-length GhMYB4 ORF fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain in a pDEST32 (Invitrogen) vector and a prey vector carrying full-length GhMYB66 ORF fused to the GAL4 DNA activation domain in a pDEST22 (Invitrogen) vector were generated according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ProQuest Two-Hybrid System; Invitrogen). pDEST32 and pDEST22 were introduced into AH109 and Y189 strains, respectively. The primers used in the study are listed in Supplemental Table S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lettuce RNA Extraction and cDNA Library

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Lactuca sativa cv. Olof seedlings were sprayed with water, 0.1 mg ml−1 benzothiadiazole (BTH) solution, B. lactucae race Bl:24 (compatible interaction) or isolate F703 (incompatible interaction) spore suspension. RNA was extracted using phenol/chloroform extraction at 24 h after BTH treatment and 3 days after infection; 2 mg of RNA (0.5 mg per treatments) was used to construct a three‐frame uncut cDNA library in prey vector pDEST22 by Invitrogen Custom Services (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening for DY1 Interactors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The yeast two-hybrid screening was performed largely according to the MatchmakerTM GAL4 Two-Hybrid System 3 & Libraries User Manual (TaKaRa). Full length ORF of DY1 was cloned into pDEST32 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) and then transformed into the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strain AH109. A. thaliana cDNA library constructed in pDEST22 (Invitrogen) was maintained in the yeast strain Y187. After mating, diploid yeast cells were screened on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His triple dropout medium. From positive colonies, cDNA insertions encoding the prey proteins were amplified by PCR and sequenced. Candidate genes were further tested for pair-wise interaction using a pGAD-T7/pGBK-T7 system (TaKaRa). Briefly, the coding sequences of DY1 and candidate genes were cloned into pGAD-T7 and pGBK-T7, respectively. Plasmids were co-transformed into yeast strain AH109 and selected on SD/-Leu/-Trp double drop out plates. Colonies were serial diluted and further tested on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade quadruple dropout plates for detecting protein–protein interactions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!