The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mct 35

Manufactured by Scanco
Sourced in Switzerland

The MCT 35 is a compact and versatile laboratory instrument designed for precise measurement and analysis. It features a high-resolution digital display and intuitive controls for user-friendly operation. The core function of the MCT 35 is to provide accurate and reliable measurements for various laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using mct 35

1

Micro-CT Analysis of Bone Regeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tibias from mice at 0 to 35 days after drill injury or 7 to 35 days after fracture were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 C, washed with PBS, and scanned using a Scanco Medical mCT 35. Tibias were scanned at an isotropic voxel size of 3.5mm, with peak tube voltage of 55 kV and current of 0.145 mA (mCT 35; Scanco). A three-dimensional Gaussian filter (s = 0.8) with a limited, finite filter support of one was used to suppress noise. A threshold of 342-1000 was used to segment mineralized bone from air and soft tissues. To determine callus volume, Scanco Medical software was used to draw contours around the outside of the callus in the x-y plane on every 10th level on the z axis, and the morph function was used to interpolate contours for the intervening levels. Callus total volume and bone volume were then determined using the same number of z-slices for each bone in the experiment. Analysis of bone volume as a fraction of total volume (BV/TV) was performed using the entire callus volume for each bone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Micro-CT Imaging of Femur Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-computed tomography (CT) imaging and analyses were performed using a bench-top cone-beam-type in vivo animal scanner (mCT 35; Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland). The animals were imaged at settings of 70 kVp and 141 μA using a 0.5-mm-thick aluminum filter. The pixel size was 8.0 μm and the rotation step was 0.4°. Cross-sectional images were reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm (NRecon software; Bruker microCT, Kontich, Belgium). For each scan, a stack of 286 cross-sections was reconstructed at 2000 × 1335 pixels. The femur bone volume and surface were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Micro-CT Assessment of Paw Erosions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fore paws were scanned using a Scanco mCT-35 instrument at an isotropic voxel size of 7mm, and 3-dimensional images were generated with software supplied by the manufacturer. The severity of periarticular erosions was determined blindly using the 3-dimensional images with a semiquantitative scale as described 42 . Four anatomical sites in the wrist joint were scored on a scale from 0–3: the distal ulnar epiphysis and the bases of the third, fourth, and fifth metacarpals. The left and right fore paw scores were averaged as the composite score for each mouse. Individual mouse scores were then averaged within experimental groups for final erosion scores.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Bone Regeneration in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues from the original defect of each group of mice were fixed in 10% formalin at 4°C for 48 hrs and then scanned by micro‐CT (mCT‐35, Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) with a resolution of 7 μm. The samples were then decalcified in 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for 2 weeks, embedded in paraffin and cut into serial buccal and lingual sagittal cross sections. The sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) according to standard methods. Newly formed bone in the H&E‐stained sections was quantified in four sections with three different defects per treatment. H&E stains were examined and photographed with a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope and Spot Advanced software (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI, USA). Then, six images of three slices of each specimen were randomly collected and were randomly collected under the same exposure value at high magnification (×200). And the inner field of the defect area of each H&E staining slice was determined under low magnification (×40). The area (mm2) percentages of the new bone to the area of the defect were calculated using Image‐Pro Plus bioimage professional analysis software. Furthermore, the boundary of the defects around the tooth root was defined, and the new alveolar bone, PDL and cementum were observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Micro-CT Imaging and Analysis of Femur Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-CT imaging and analysis were performed using a benchtop, cone-beam animal scanner (mCT 35; SCANCO Medical, Switzerland). The parameters were 70 kVp and 141 μA; we used a 0.5-mm-thick aluminum filter. The pixel size was 8.0 μm and the rotation step 0.4°C. Cross-sectional images were reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm (NRecon software, Bruker Micro CT, Belgium). For each scan, a stack of 286 cross-sections was reconstructed at 2,000 × 1,335 pixels. Bone volume and surface were analyzed at the femur.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Micro-CT Analysis of Mouse Knee Osteophytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dissected mouse knee joints were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C and replaced with PBS before micro-CT analysis. Knee joints were scanned at an isotropic voxel size of 7 μm, with a peak tube voltage of 70 kV and current of 0.114 mA (mCT 35; Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland). A three-dimensional Gaussian filter (s = 0.8) with a limited, finite filter support of one was used to suppress noise in the images, and a threshold of 220–1 000 was used to segment mineralized bone from the air and soft tissues. The region of interest was selected for calcified osteophyte tissues, and the bone volume was calculated to measure the osteophyte size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Micro-CT Assessment of Paw Erosions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fore paws were scanned using a Scanco mCT-35 instrument at an isotropic voxel size of 7mm, and 3-dimensional images were generated with software supplied by the manufacturer. The severity of periarticular erosions was determined blindly using the 3-dimensional images with a semiquantitative scale as described 42 . Four anatomical sites in the wrist joint were scored on a scale from 0–3: the distal ulnar epiphysis and the bases of the third, fourth, and fifth metacarpals. The left and right fore paw scores were averaged as the composite score for each mouse. Individual mouse scores were then averaged within experimental groups for final erosion scores.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Micro-CT Imaging of Mouse Spine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-computed tomography imaging was performed using a bench-top cone-beam-type in vivo animal scanner (mCT 35; Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland). Mice were euthanized; their spines were dissected and immediately placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, where they were incubated for 2 weeks. Samples were imaged at settings of 60 kVp and 166 μA using a 0.25-mm-thick aluminum filter. The pixel size was 16 μm and the rotation step was 0.6°. Cross-sectional images were reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm (NRecon software; Bruker microCT, Kontich, Belgium). For each scan, a stack of 286 cross-sections was reconstructed at 2,000 × 1,335 pixels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Micro-CT Analysis of Femur Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-computed tomography (CT) was performed using a bench-top cone-beam type in vivo animal scanner (mCT 35; SCANCO Medical, Wangen-Brüttisellen, Switzerland). The animals were imaged at settings of 70 kVp and 141 μA using a 0.5-mm-thick aluminum filter. The pixel size was 8.0 μm and the rotation step was 0.4°. Cross-sectional images were reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm (NRecon software, Bruker micro CT; Bruker, Kontich, Belgium). For each scan, a stack of 286 cross-sections was reconstructed at 2,000 × 1,335 pixels. Bone volume and surface were analyzed at the femur.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bone Microstructure Analysis via μCT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Femurs and lumbar vertebrae were dissected stored in 70% ethanol at room temperature. Femurs and lumbar vertebrae were scanned at an isotropic voxel size of 10 mm, respectively, with peak tube voltage of 70 kV and current of 0.114 mA (mCT 35; Scanco Medical AG, Bassersdorf, Switzerland). A three-dimensional Gaussian filter (s = 0.8) with a limited, finite filter support of one was used to suppress noise in the images, and a threshold of 220-1000 was used to segment mineralized bone from air and soft tissues. Trabecular bone parameters were measured in the distal metaphysis of the femurs. The region of interest was selected from below the distal growth plate where the epiphyseal cap structure completely disappeared and continued for 100 slices toward the proximal end of the femur. Contours were drawn manually a few voxels away from the endocortical surface to define trabecular bones in the metaphysis (Bouxsein et al., 2010) . Cortical bone parameters were measured by analyzing 100 slices in mid-diaphysis femurs. Vertebral bone parameters were measured by analyzing 200 slices in the middle of L3 lumbar vertebrae.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!