The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pcr cleanup kit

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United States

The PCR Cleanup kit is a laboratory product designed to purify and concentrate DNA fragments amplified by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) prior to downstream applications. The kit utilizes a simple and efficient protocol to remove unwanted primers, nucleotides, and other reaction components, providing a purified DNA sample ready for further analysis or manipulation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using pcr cleanup kit

1

Construction of pSC1a: Inducible gtr6 expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to make pSC1, the gtr6-hyg chimeric cassette was inserted in the middle of the lacZ gene of puc19, where all of the gene except of 5’ end 32 bases, was deleted. However, the gtr6 gene in pSC1 was devoid of its promoter and was not inducible. Additionally, as a small portion of the 5’ end of the lacZ gene remained, the gtr6 gene could not be induced by the lac promoter either. Hence, we decided to delete the 5’ end fragment of lacZ from the gtr6 upstream region and clone the 192 base pair long indigenous promoter region of gtr6 upstream of the gene itself thus creating pSC1a. The plasmid pSC1 (S2E Fig) and the gtr6 indigenous promoter sequence (192 bp) were PCR amplified (S3 Text). The linearized plasmid PCR product was purified with NEB PCR clean up kit using manufacturer’s protocol while the promoter region PCR product was gel purified by NEB Gel purification kit following manufacturer’s protocol. The linear fragments were subjected to Gibson cloning using NEB Gibson Cloning kit following manufacturer’s protocol and was transformed in to NEB 5α Competent E. coli cells. The recombinant clones were selected on LB Hygromycin (150μg/mL) agar plates. Putative clones were grown overnight in 5mL LB Hygromycin (150μg/mL) broth and 1uL was used to perform colony PCR with primers Gtr6-Hyg Internal 5&3 as described previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phylogenetic Analysis of Amplified Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amplified PCR products were purified using a PCR Cleanup kit (NEB, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions, and sent to Macrogen (The Netherlands) for sequencing. The quality of sequences was verified using the software BioEdit 7.0.9.0 (47 ). The BLASTn program was used to identify closely related species in the NCBI database. Pairwise and multiple-sequence alignments were carried out with CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic trees were constructed by means of the maximum likelihood statistical method using MEGA7 software (48 (link)). The evolutionary history was inferred by means of the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model (49 (link)). The robustness of branching was estimated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates (50 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Construction of Transcription Templates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pcDNA4 T7 c-JUN and pcDNA4 T7ACTB plasmids used for in vitro transcription were provided by Dr. Amy Lee (Brandeis University, Waltham, MA)22 (link),23 (link). The c-JUN template was constructed by amplifying the ORF and 3′ untranslated region from human cDNA and joined together downstream of a T7 promoter by Gibson assembly into pcDNA4. After added the T7 promoter to ACTB by PCR amplification the fragment was inserted into pcDNA4.
CDK12 and MMP1 templates were generated by PCR amplification and addition of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter with high-fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB#M0491). The design primers containing the T7 promoter followed by sequences of interest are:
5′-CATATGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGATGCCCAATTCAGAGAGA-3′ and
5′-CGCGGCCGCAGTAAGGAACTCCTCTC-3′ for CDK12, and
5′-CATATGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGATGCACAGCTTTCCTCC-3′ and
5′-GGCGGCCGCAATTTTTCCTGCAGTTGAACC-3′ for MMP1.
Prior to its use as a template for in vitro transcription, the PCR products were analyzed by agarose-gel electrophoresis and purify by PCR Cleanup Kit (NEB#T1030).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phylogenetic Analysis of Rhizobial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PCR-amplified gene products were purified using a PCR cleanup kit (NEB, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified DNA was sequenced at Macrogen laboratories (The Netherlands). The software BioEdit 7.0.9.0 was used to confirm the quality of sequences34 . The sequences of each gene were subjected to BLASTn in the National Centre Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to identify closely related rhizobial species. The alignment of the reference strain sequences with the test rhizobial isolates were done with CLUSTAL W and phylogenetic trees were inferred using MEGA 7 software35 (link). The Kimura 2-paramete model with uniform rates among the sites was used to calculate evolutionary distances and evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood method. The robustness of tree branching was estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates of the sequence36 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rhizobial Genomic DNA Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The target genes from the rhizobial genomic DNA of each test isolate were amplified using suitable primer pairs and thermal cycling conditions as described for BOX-PCR fingerprinting. All PCR-amplified products (16S rRNA, nifH, glnII, rpoB, recA, and gyrB regions) were purified with a PCR cleanup kit (New England BioLabs, USA), followed by gene sequencing (Macrogen, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phylogenetic Analysis of Amplified DNA Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For sequencing, the amplified PCR products were purified using PCR Cleanup kit (NEB, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The purified amplified DNA was sent to Macrogen (Netherlands) for sequencing. Thereafter, the quality of sequences was verified using the software BioEdit 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999 ). The BLASTn program was used to identify closely related species in the NCBI database. Pairwise and multiple sequence alignments were done with CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic trees constructed by means of the maximum likelihood statistical method using MEGA 7 software (Kumar, Stecher and Tamura 2016 (link)). The robustness of branching was estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein 1985 (link)). The obtained sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank to get the accession numbers which were indicated in phylogenetic tress. The test gene sequences of the isolates used for phylogenetic tree constructions are shown in Figure S2 (Supporting Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Bacterial Sequence Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to sequencing, the amplified PCR products were purified using a PCR Cleanup kit (NEB, USA), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Thereafter, the amplified PCR products were sequenced at Macrogen (Netherlands). The quality of the sequences was assessed using the software BioEdit 7.0.9.018 . Closely related species were identified using the BLASTn program in the NCBI (National Centre for Biotechnology Information) database. Multiple and pairwise sequence alignments were carried-out using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 7 software by means of the maximum likelihood statistical method19 (link). The robustness of the tree branching was estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates20 . The sequences obtained were deposited in the NCBI GenBank to obtain accession numbers OM721967–OM721998 (16S rRNA), OM744177–OM744199 (atpD), OM839789–OM839804 (dnaK), OM839805–OM839832 (glnII), OM839833–OM839864 (rpoB), OM839865–OM839870; OM839872-OM839876; OM839882-OM839884 (nifH) and OM846520–OM846539 (nodC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phylogenetic Analysis of Cowpea Rhizobial Symbionts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the rhizobial symbionts of cowpea in this study, representative isolates were subjected to phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene. For this, the selected isolates were subjected to PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene using primer pairs in a 25 µl reaction mixture as described previousely49 (link). To confirm the PCR products, gel electrophoresis was carried out in 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide in TAE buffer at 85 V for 1 h.
The amplified PCR products were purified using PCR Clean-up kit (NEB, USA) by following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified amplified products were sent to Macrogen (Netherlands) for sequencing of one strand of the 16S rRNA gene. Thereafter, the quality of sequences was checked using the software BioEdit 7.0.9.050 . The BLASTn program was used to search for closely related species in the NCBI database51 (link). Pairwise and multiple sequence alignments, and phylogenetic trees were constructed using trimmed sequences of uniform lengths by means of the maximum likelihood statistical method using MEGA 7 software52 (link). The robustness of branching was estimated using 1000 bootstrap replicates53 (link). The sequences were deposited in the NCBI to obtain accession numbers (MZ007813–MZ007845).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phylogenetic Analysis of Microbial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amplified PCR products were purified using PCR clean up kit (NEB, USA) and sent to Macrogen company, The Netherlands, for sequencing. The quality of the sequences were assessed using BioEdit 7.0.0 software25 . Closely related species were identified using the BLASTn (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) program in the NCBI (National Centre for Biotechnology Information) server. The 16S rRNA, atpD, gyrB and glnII, nodC, and nifH gene sequences of the reference or type strains used in this study were retrieved from the NCBI-GenBank database. Close reference type strain sequences from the NCBI GenBank database were selected and aligned with sequences of the test strains using MUSCLE26 (link), and used to construct phylogenetic trees using the MEGA 6.0 program27 (link). Phylogenetic trees were generated using the P-distance method to calculate evolutionary distance28 , and evolutional history was inferred using the Maximum likelihood method29 (link) algorithm with 1000 bootstraps to allow for a strong support30 (link). The MEGA 6 program was used to calculate transition-transversion-ratio to know the content of homoplasy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Plasmid Linearization via EcoRI-HF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pUC19 DNA isolated from plasmid cleavage assays with E. coli. was used for the plasmid linearization test. To set up the linearization reactions, 20 units of EcoRI-HF® (New England Biolabs®) was mixed with 500 ng of isolated DNA (40 units/μg DNA) in CutSmart® buffer (New England Biolabs®), pH 7.9, in a total volume of 50 μL for 30 min at 37 °C. The CutSmart® buffer (New England Biolabs®) contains 50 mM potassium acetate, 20 mM Tris-acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, and 100 μg/mL BSA. To set up the negative control reactions, 500 ng of isolated DNA was treated with CutSmart buffer® (New England Biolabs®), pH 7.9, in a total volume of 50 μL for 30 min at 37 °C. The reacted DNA was then purified using PCR clean-up kit (New England Biolabs®) and quantified using the nanodrop. The DNA was then stored at −20 °C before electrophoretic analysis. The clb+ cross-linked linearized pUC19 DNA was used as positive control for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!