The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spurr low viscosity resin

Sourced in United States

Spurr low-viscosity resin is a pre-formulated epoxy resin system designed for use in electron microscopy sample preparation. It is a two-component resin that provides low viscosity and good penetration into samples, aiding in the embedding and sectioning of specimens for electron microscopy analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using spurr low viscosity resin

1

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Capsular Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was carried as previously described23 (link). Unless otherwise indicated, chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich. Briefly, bacteria were grown to mid-logarithmic phase and washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3. Rabbit antisera (150 μl) directed against the different CPS types were used for CPS stabilization. Next, cells were immobilized in 4% (w/v) agar in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3 (Canemco & Marivac, Canton de Gore, QC, Canada). Prefixation was performed adding 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, containing 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.15% (w/v) ruthenium red for 30 min. Fixation was performed for 2 h at room temperature with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, containing 5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.05% (w/v) ruthenium red. Post-fixation was carried out with 2% (v/v) osmium tetroxide in water at 4 °C for 16 h. Samples were washed with water every 20 min for 2 h to remove osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in increasing graded series of acetone. Specimens were then washed twice in propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr low-viscosity resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Thin sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined with a transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (Hitachi model HT7770, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise indicated, chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Transmission electron microscopy was carried out as previously described [31 (link), 32 ]. Briefly, bacteria were grown to mid-logarithmic phase and washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3 (Canemco & Marivac, Canton de Gore, QC) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.05% ruthenium red. Ferritin was then added to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then immobilized in 3% agar in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3, washed five times in cacodylate buffer containing 0.05% ruthenium red, and fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at room temperature. Afterwards, samples were washed with water every 20 min for 2 h to remove osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in an increasing graded series of acetone. Specimens were then washed twice in propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr low-viscosity resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Thin sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined using a transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (Hitachi model HT7770, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Intestinal Tissue Preparation for TEM and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare samples for transmission electron microscopy (TEM), approximately 0.3 cm of ileum adjacent to the cecum was collected and fixed with perfluorohexane/1% osmium tetroxide solution36 (link),37 (chemicals from Sigma Aldrich) for 2 hours on ice and then placed in perfluorohexane for 2 days at 4 °C. Samples were exchanged in 100% ethanol (Sigma Aldrich), embedded in Spurr low-viscosity resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and polymerized for 24 hrs at 70 °C. The intestinal cross-section was thin sectioned using an ultramicrotome (Reichert-Jung Ultracut E), mounted on copper-coated carbon grids (Electron Microcopy Sciences), and imaged using a JEOL JEM-1010 transition electron microscope.
To prepare samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM), approximately 0.75 cm of ileum about 0.7 cm prior to the cecum was collected and divided into two pieces. Samples were cut open longitudinally and immersed in perfluorohexane/1% osmium tetroxide solution or Carnoy’s fixative36 (link),37 (10% glacial acetic acid, 30% chloroform, 60% ethanol, chemicals from Sigma Aldrich) for 2 hours at 4 °C. Samples were exchanged in 100% ethanol, critical point dried using Samdri®-PVT-3D drier, and sputter-coated with 10 nm gold using Cressington Sputter Coater 208HR. Scanning electron micrographs were taken using a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope operated at 2 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electron Microscopy of Bacterial Capsule

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise indicated, chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Bacteria were grown to mid-logarithmic phase and washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3 (Canemco & Marivac, Canton de Gore, QC, Canada). The CPS was stabilized using specific antibodies as previously described (46 (link)). Anti-S. suis serotype 2 rabbit serum, produced as previously described (47 (link)), was used to gently resuspend bacteria. Next, cells were immobilized in 4% (w/v) agar in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3. Pre-fixation was performed by adding 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, containing 0.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, and 0.15% (w/v) ruthenium red for 30 min. Fixation was performed for 2 h at room temperature with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.3, containing 5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, and 0.05% (w/v) ruthenium red. Post-fixation was carried out with 2% (v/v) osmium tetroxide in water overnight at 4°C. Samples were washed with water every 20 min for 2 h to remove osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in an increasing graded series of acetone. Specimens were then washed twice in propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr low-viscosity resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Thin sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined using a transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (Hitachi model HT7770, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise indicated, chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Transmission electron microscopy was carried out as previously described [35 , 44 (link)]. Briefly, bacteria were grown to mid-logarithmic phase and washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3 (Canemco & Marivac, Canton de Gore, QC) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.05% ruthenium red. Ferritin was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then immobilized in 3% agar in 0.1M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3, washed five times in cacodylate buffer containing 0.05% ruthenium red, and fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at room temperature. Afterwards, samples were washed with water every 20 min for 2 h to remove osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in an increasing graded series of acetone. Specimens were then washed twice in propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr low-viscosity resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Thin sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined using a transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (Hitachi model HT7770, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TEM Visualization of Bacterial Surface CPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was carried out to confirm CPS expression at the bacterial surface of different mutant strains as previously described (Roy et al., 2015 (link)). Briefly, bacteria were grown to mid-logarithmic phase and resuspended in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3 containing 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.05% (w/v) ruthenium red. Fixation was performed for 2 h at room temperature. Ferritin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) was then added to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Afterwards, cells were immobilized in 4% (w/v) agar in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.3 and post-fixed with 2% (v/v) osmium tetroxide in water overnight at 4°C. Samples were washed with water every 20 min for 2 h to remove osmium tetroxide and dehydrated in an increasing graded series of acetone. Specimens were then washed twice in propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr low-viscosity resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Thin sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined with a transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (model JEM 1230, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tannic Acid–Uranyl Acetate Tissue Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tannic aciduranyl acetate tissue processing protocol was slightly modified from Phend et al. (1995) (link). In brief, vibratome sections were treated with 1% tannic acid (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M Hepes, pH 7.4, for 1 h. Sections were rinsed with 0.1 M maleate buffer, pH 6.0, and then treated with 1% uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in the same buffer for 1 h. Sections were rinsed, dehydrated with ethanol, infiltrated, and embedded with Spurr low-viscosity resin between two sheets of ACLAR films (Electron Microscopy Sciences). To test the effect of membrane permeability on the staining pattern of tannic aciduranyl acetate, 0.5% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the tannic acid solution.
A subset of samples was processed using the osmium tetroxide method as in Ding et al. (2015) (link). Vibratome sections were treated with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h, mordanted en bloc with 1% uranyl acetate, dehydrated, and embedded in Spurr resin.
60–80-nm ultrathin sections were cut with an ultramicrotome (Leica), collected on copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and poststained with 1% uranyl acetate and Sato’s lead (Sato, 1968 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!