The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

42 protocols using lino3

1

Preparation of Li2S8-Catholyte for Li-S Batteries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Li2S8–catholyte was prepared by mixing lithium sulphide (Li2S, Aldrich) and sulfur (Aldrich) in a 1:7 molar ratio in tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME, Aldrich) at room temperature and stirring the solution for 24 h. The solution was then mixed with dioxolane (DOL, Aldrich) with 3/7 w/w ratio. Finally, 0.1 mole of LiNO3 (Aldrich) was added to 1 liter of TEGDME3-DOL7 0.5 M Li2S8 and stirred for 24 h. The final composition of the catholyte was TEGDME3-DOL7 0.5 M Li2S8-0.1 M LiNO3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized Li-Sulfur Cell Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coin cells were assembled with a cathode described above, a Li-foil anode (14 mm in diameter), a glass microfiber separator (Whatman), and 20 μl of electrolyte solution. The electrolyte/sulfur ratio was 6–12 μl mg−1, which is slightly lower as compared to ref. 32 . This separator exhibited an improved performance and higher cycling stability in coin cells as compared to the commonly used polypropylene Celgard separator. The electrolyte used for Li–sulfur cells consisted of 1.0 M lithium bis-(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI, Aldrich) dissolved in a mixture of 1,3-dioxolane and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (1 : 1 by volume) with 1.0 wt% LiNO3 (Aldrich) as an electrolyte additive. LiTFSI was dried in a vacuum at 130 °C overnight, LiNO3 at 50 °C in a vacuum overnight, and the mixture of organic solvents was dried over a molecular sieve 4 Å (Aldrich). The electrolyte used for cyclic voltammetry of pristine LiHEOFeCl consisted of 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate (1 : 1 by volume). Both electrolyte solutions contained 8–12 ppm H2O as determined by Karl Fischer coulometric titration (Mettler Toledo). Electrolytes and solvents were of standard quality (p. a. or electrochemical grade) purchased from Aldrich or Merck.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

LiInO2 Coated NCA Cathode Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A commercial Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O2 (NCA) powder was used as a pristine cathode. To prepare the LiInO2 coating solution, lithium nitrate (LiNO3, Aldrich) and indium nitrate hydrate (In(NO3)3xH2O) were dissolved in anhydrous ethanol (99.9%, Aldrich) at 70 °C. The amount of LiInO2 was adjusted to 0.5 wt.%, 1.0 wt.%, and 2.0 wt.% of the cathode powder. For the LiInO2–LiI coating solution, ammonium iodide and lithium nitrate were also dissolved in the solution of LiInO2 in anhydrous ethanol, at 0.25 mol% or 1 mol% relative to the molar ratio of LiInO2. Pristine cathode powder was added to the coating solution and stirred at 70 °C until the solvent was completely evaporated. The dried materials were heat treated at 650 °C (ramping rate = 2 °C/min.) for 5 h under air atmosphere to obtain LiInO2-coated NCA powder. As samples for comparison, the LiInO2–LiI coating solutions were dried at 70 °C and heat treated at 650 °C for 5 h, which is same condition for the coating process, to obtain the LiInO2–LiI composite powders.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fabrication of Lithium-Doped Indium Oxide Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zirconium oxynitrate hydrate (ZrO(NO3)2·xH2O), In(NO3)3·xH2O, and LiNO3 (all purchased from Aldrich) were employed as dielectric, MOS, and dopant precursors, respectively, while 2-methoxyethanol (2MeEtOH, Aldrich) was utilized as a solvent. A 100-nm-thick SiO2 layer on a highly doped p-type Si substrate was used to fabricate a coplanar bottom gate. A 0.1 M ZrO2 precursor solution was first prepared by dissolving ZrO(NO3)(NO3)2·xH2O in 2MeEtOH with stirring at room temperature for 12 h. Next, 0.3 M MOS precursor solutions were made by dissolving In(NO3)3·xH2O in 2MeEtOH with stirring at 40 °C for 4 h. Different amounts of LiNO3 as an additive were then introduced to the In2O3 precursor solutions with stirring at 40 °C for 2 h; the Li fraction was varied from 0 to 30 mol% (stoichiometry in solution). All solutions were filtered through a 0.2 μm membrane-syringe filter prior to solution casting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solid-State Synthesis of Perovskite Oxides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the samples in the present work were prepared by conventional solid‐state reaction (SSR). Nb2O5 (99.99%), Ba(NO3)2 (≥99%), Sr(NO3)2 (≥99%), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (≥98%), KNO3 (≥99%), LiNO3 (99.99%), and Fe2O3 (99.995%) were purchased from Aldrich Ltd. and used as starting materials. For the preparation of the SBN, SBNC30, SBNC45, and SBNC60 samples, the corresponding chemicals were mixed homogeneously in stoichiometric ratios according to the formula Sr0.5Ba0.5Nb2‐xCoxO6‐δ (x = 0, 0.3, 0.45, 0.6). The mixed powders were first pressed into pellets under axial pressure (8 MPa) and calcinated at 700 °C for 2 h in air. After cooling down, these pellets were reground into fine powders and repressed into pellets under axial pressure (12 MPa). After sintering at 1150 °C for 12 h in air atmosphere, all the pellets were ground for 2 h before characterizations and electrochemistry tests. Sr0.5Ba0.5Fe0.45Nb1.55O6 denoted as SBNF45 and Sr0.4Ba0.4Co0.2Nb2CoO6 denoted as (SBC)N were also prepared under the same conditions. KNb0.775Co0.225O3 (KNC), LiNb0.925Co0.075O3 (LNC075), and LiNb0.775Co0.225O3 (LNC225) were prepared by following the same procedure except for their relatively lower final sintering temperature (1000 °C). Commercial IrO2 (99.9%) with a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of ≈32.5 m2 g−1 was also purchased from Aldrich Ltd. and tested after grinding.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis of Inorganic Microporous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Colloidal silica (Ludox HS-40 or Ludox AS-40, Dupont), aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH3)•H 2O, 99%, Aldrich), aluminum tri-sec-butoxide (Al[O(s-Bu)]3, 97%, Aldrich), alkali metal hydroxides (LiOH, 98%; NaOH, 50%; KOH, 45%; RbOH, 50%; CsOH, 50%, Aldrich), alkali metal nitrates (LiNO3, NaNO3, KNO3, RbNO3, CsNO3, 99%, Aldrich), 1,4diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO, 99%, Aldrich), alkyl (methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl) iodides (96-99%, Aldrich), tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH, 35%, Aldrich), tetraethylammonium hydroxide (TEAOH, 35%, Aldrich), tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH, 35%, Aldrich), tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH, 35%, Aldrich), and organic structure-directing agents (OSDAs) prepared in this work.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lithium-Sulfur Battery Electrolyte Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blank electrolyte was 1 M lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI, 99.95% trace metal basis from Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in 1,3-dioxolane (DOL, 99.8% from Sigma-Aldrich) and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME, 99.5% from Sigma-Aldrich) (1:1 volume ratio). Lithium nitrate (LiNO3, 99.99% from Aldrich, 1 wt. %) was added to develop a stable solid-electrolyte-interphase (SEI) on the surface of the Li metal anode during cycling. The catholyte (1 M Li2S6) was prepared by dissolving stoichiometric amount of Li2S (99.9% from Alfa-Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA) and sulfur (≥99.5% from Sigma-Aldrich) in the blank electrolyte.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preparation of Li2S8-based Catholytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LiPS (Li2S8 based) solutions of 0.2 M were prepared by heating and stirring stoichiometric amounts of lithium sulfide (Li2S) and sulfur (S8) (both from Sigma-Aldrich) in DOL:DME (Sigma-Aldrich) (1:1 in volume). The catholytes were mixed at 60 °C for 12 h, along with 0.2 M lithium nitrate (LiNO3, Sigma-Aldrich) additive and one of the following lithium salts: 1 M lithium bis(trifluromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI, 3 M), lithium trifluoromethanesulfonate (LiTf, Sigma-Aldrich), or LiBr (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis of Lithium-Based Electrolytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lithium bis(trifluorosulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), LiPF6, LiBF4, 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), 1,3-dioxolane (DOL), propylene carbonate (PC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), vinylene carbonate (VC) and fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) were purchased from KISIDA Chemical. LiAsF6, LiClO4, Li3PO4, LiNO3, LiBr, LiCl, LiF and lithium bis(oxalate)borate (LiBOB) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used after drying at 100 °C for 15 h under vacuum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Li-S Pouch Cell Electrochemical Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The prepared cathodes were used for the assembly of Li–S pouch cells. The cathodes were prepared with different sulfur loadings (2.0, 4.0, and 5.3 mgs cm−2) and different theoretical capacities (3.3, 6.6, and 8.9 mAh cm−2, respectively), derived from the theoretical capacity of elemental sulfur (1,672 mAh g−1).
One layer of a commercial polyolefin separator, Celgard 2,500 was used. The electrolyte was based on 0.38 M LiTFSI (Sigma Aldrich) and 0.32 M LiNO3 (Sigma Aldrich) as an additive in a 3/1 (v/v) mixture of DME and DOL (both purchased from BASF). Lithium foils with a thickness of 50, 75, 100, and 125 µm purchased from Rockwood Lithium were used as the anode.
Vacuum drying of electrodes and cell assembly was conducted in a dry room with a dew point below −50°C. Thereafter, the assembled pouch cells were cycled in a BaSyTec Cell Test System (Germany) at 25 ± 1°C controlled by air conditioning.
The electrochemical behavior of the assembled pouch cell was evaluated at different discharge C-rates (C/20, C/10, C/5, C/2.5, and 1C), considering the theoretical capacity of elemental sulfur (C = 1,672 mAh g−1). The cycle life of the pouch cells was investigated within a 1.9–2.5 V cycling interval at C/10 charge-discharge current C-rate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!