The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using anti ifn γ clone xmg1

1

Multiparametric Analysis of T Cell Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens were collected and tissue was processed into single-cell suspension. Surface staining was conducted by incubating splenocytes with appropriate antibody cocktails for 20 min at 4°C. Endogenous memory and naïve CD8 T cells were detected based upon surface staining with anti-CD8 (clone 53-6.7, eBioscience) and anti-CD11a (clone M17/4, eBioscience) as previously described (30 (link)). P14 cells were detected based upon surface staining with anti-CD8 and anti-Thy1.1 (clone His51, eBioscience), and in some instances 1° earlyM and lateM or 1° and 3° memory P14 cells were distinguished from one another based upon additional surface staining with anti-Thy1.2 (clone 53-2.1, eBioscience). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed using anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2, eBioscience) or anti-granzymeB (anti-GrB; clone GB12, Invitrogen). Flow cytometry data was acquired using FACSCanto (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FloJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytokine Profiling of Mycobacterial Infections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens were isolated from H37Rv- and H37RvΔTlyA-infected mice and macerated by frosted slides in 10% RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Invitrogen) and made into a single cell suspension. RBCs were lysed with RBC lysis buffer, incubated at room temperature for 2–3 min, and washed with 10% RPMI 1640 medium. The cells were counted, and 1 × 106 cells were used for surface staining. Cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS and stained with fluorescent antibodies directed against surface markers. For intracellular staining, 1 × 106 cells were cultured per well in 24-well plates (Corning, Co-star) and activated with 50 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Sigma) and 750 ng/ml ionomycin (Sigma) overnight, and 10 mg/ml brefeldin A (eBiosciences) was added during the last 3 h of culture. After staining, cells were washed again with PBS, and cells were fixed with 100 μl of fixation buffer (eBiosciences) for 15 min, then resuspended in 200 μl of 1× permeabilization buffer (eBiosciences), and stained with fluorescently conjugated monoclonal antibodies as follows: anti-IL-4 (clone, 8D4-8), anti-IL-17 (clone, 17B7), and anti-IFN-γ (clone, XMG1.2), all from Pharmingen. Fluorescence intensity of fluorochrome-labeled cells was acquired and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Canto II, BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed by Flow Jo (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry analysis was performed by Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies) using FlowJo software (Tree Star). For Intracellular cytokine staining, cells were stimulated with 20 ng/mL phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (Sigma) and 1 mmol/L ionomycin (Sigma) for 5 hour in the presence of a GolgiStop (BD Bioscience). The antibodies used were as follows; anti‐CD16/CD32 (clone 2.4G2; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD4 (clone H129.19; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD25 (clone PC61; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD103 (clone M290; BD Bioscience), anti‐GITR (clone DTA1; BD Bioscience), anti‐CTLA‐4 (clone UC10; BD Bioscience), anti‐Foxp3 (clone FJK‐16s; eBioscience), anti‐CD11c (clone HL3; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD80 (clone 16‐10A1; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD86 (clone GL1; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD49b (clone HMa2; BD Bioscience), anti‐LAG3 (clone C9B7W; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD11b (clone M1/70; BD Bioscience), anti‐Ly6C (clone AL‐21; BD Bioscience), anti‐CD115 (clone AFS98; eBioscience), anti‐F4/80 (clone BM8; eBioscience), anti‐CD206 (clone C068C2; BioLegend), anti‐IFNγ (clone XMG1.2; eBioscience), anti‐IL‐4 (clone BVD4‐1D11; eBioscience), anti‐IL‐10 (clone JES5‐16E3; eBioscience) and isotype‐matched control antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Murine Splenocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse splenocytes were stained for extracellular markers followed by intracellular staining (ICS) using the Cytofix/Cytoperm containing monensin kit (BD Biosciences, NC) according to manufacturer instructions. The antibodies that were used were anti-CD3ε (clone 145-2C11), anti-CD8α (clone 53-6.7), anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5), anti DX5 (clone DX5) and anti IFNγ (clone XMG 1.2, all from e-Bioscience). Acquisition was performed with FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed with FlowJo 7.6 software (Tristar, CA). The total NK, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ cell numbers in the spleen were determined by multiplying the percentage of each cell type by the total number of cells isolated from the organ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunological Biomarkers Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-mouse CD3e (clone 145-2c11) and anti-mouse CD28 (clone 37.51) were purchased from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA). Murine IL-2, IL-4, IFNγ, IL-12, anti-IL-4 (clone 11B11), and anti-IFNγ (clone XMG1.2) were purchased from eBioscience (Wembley, United Kingdom). Anti-mouse GATA-3, total and phosphorylated ERK1/2, and AKT were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). Anti-T-box transcription factor (T-bet/Tbx21) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), anti-FPRL-1 purchased from NOVUS (Colorado, USA), and anti-ANXA1 purchased from Proteintech (Manchester, UK). Unless otherwise specified, all the other reagents were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multi-parameter flow cytometric analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For surface staining anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, eBioscience), anti-IL22R1 (clone 496514, R&D sytems) or relevant isotype control antibodies were used. For intracellular flowcytometry, splenocytes or paws cells were stimulated with PMA(5 ng/ml) and Ionomycin(500 ng/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and Brefeldin A (Biolegend) for 6 hours, prior to staining with anti-IL-17A (clone TC11-18H10.1, Biolegend), anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2, eBioscience), or anti-IL-22 (clone IL-22JOP, eBioscience) antibodies or relevant isotype controls. Data was acquired with BD LSR and analyzed using Flow-Jo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Alveolar Macrophages and Neutrophils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BALF and lung cells were stained at 4°C in RPMI 1640 medium containing 1% FBS after FcγRII/III blocking with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (clone 93; eBioscience). Surface staining was performed with antibodies purchased from eBioscience (anti-CD45; clone 30-F11; anti-Ly6G (Gr-1), clone RB6-8C5; anti-CD11c, clone N418; and anti-CD11b, clone M1/70). Alveolar macrophages (CD11bCD11c+) and neutrophils (CD11b+Gr-1+) were analysed.
For intracellular staining, lung and spleen cells were stimulated with heat-killed bacteria at MOI (multiplicity of infection) 100 for 16 h at 37°C with Golgi block added on the last 5 hours. Cells were then surface-stained with anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5; eBioscience) and anti-γδTCR (clone GL-3; eBioscience) and followed by permeabilization with Cytofix-Cytoperm solution (BD Pharmingen). Then, the cells were stained with anti-IL-17A (clone 17B7; eBioscience) and anti-IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2; eBioscience). All samples were analysed with FACSCalibur. Data were analysed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Differentiation of CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total and CD4+ T cells were isolated from the spleens and LNs using the Mouse pan T Cell Enrichment Kit or the Mouse CD4+ T Cell Enrichment Kit, respectively (both STEMCELL Technologies; cat. nos 19852 and 19751). CD4+ T cells were stimulated with 1 μg ml−1 plate-bound anti-CD3 (clone 2C11) plus 1 μg ml−1 anti-CD28 antibodies (clone 37.51; both Bio X Cell). For differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into TH1, TH17 and TH2 cells, T cells were polarized for 3 days with 10 ng ml−1 IL-12 (PeproTech) and 2 μg ml−1 anti-IL-4 (eBioscience) for TH1; 20 ng ml−1 IL-6 (PeproTech), 0.5 ng ml−1 hTGFβ1 (PeproTech), 2 μg ml−1 anti-IL-4 (clone 11B11) and 2 μg ml−1 anti-IFNγ (clone XMG1.2; both eBioscience) for TH17 and 100 ng ml−1 IL-4 (PeproTech), 5 μg ml−1 anti-IL-12 and 20 μg ml−1 anti-IFNγ (both eBioscience) for TH2 cells in IMDM or RPMI medium (both Cellgro). Both media contained 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 mM 2-ME, 100 U ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin and 10% FCS. For cytokine expression, cells were (re-)stimulated with 1 μM ionomycin plus 20 nM phorbol myristate acetate (both Calbiochem) for 6 h in the presence of brefeldin A (BioLegend) and analysed by flow cytometry as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Differentiation of Pathogenic and Non-pathogenic Th17 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ T cells were isolated from the spleen and submandibular, axillar, inguinal, and mesenterial lymph nodes of mice by negative enrichment using a MagniSort mouse CD4+ T‐cell enrichment kit (eBioscience) and stimulated with 0.25 μg/ml plate‐bound anti‐CD3 (clone 2C11) and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 (clone 37.51; both Bio X Cell) antibodies in the presence of 2 μg/ml anti‐IL‐4 (clone 11B11) and 2 μg/ml anti‐IFN‐γ (clone XMG1.2; both eBioscience). For the differentiation into non‐pathogenic Th17 cells, CD4+ T cells were cultured in the presence of 20 ng/ml  IL‐6 (Peprotech) and 0.5 ng/ ml hTGFβ1 (PeproTech) for 2 or 3 days. For the differentiation into pathogenic Th17 cells, CD4+ T cells were cultured in the presence of 20 ng/ml IL‐6 (Peprotech), 20 ng/ml IL‐1β (Peprotech), and 20 ng/ml IL‐23 (eBioscience) for 2 or 3 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cytokine Production by mLN and SILP Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mLN and SILP cells were prepared as described above before incubating with 50μg/ml T. spiralis antigen for 24 hours in media (RPMI-1640, 10% FCS, 100U/ml Pen/strp, 5%NEAA, L-glutamine and HEPES, 0.05 mM β-mercaptoethanol (SIGMA)). Cell-free supernatants were analysed for cytokine production via cytometric bead array (BD) or paired ELISA antibodies (anti-IFNγ, clone XMG1.2 and R4-6A2; anti-IL-13, clone eBio13A and eBio1316H; anti-IL-4, clone 11B1and BVD6-2462, anti-IL-17 clone eBio17CK15A5 and eBio17B7; (eBioscience)). For TGFβ analysis samples were acid-activated prior to detection on a mouse TGF-beta 1 DuoSet ELISA (R and D Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!