The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

224 protocols using d8 venture

1

Crystal Structure Characterization Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystal data for Molecule 1 is collected on a “Bruker APEX-II CCD” diffractometer (Ga-Kα radiation, λ = 1.34139 Å, photon II detector). Crystal data for endo-[1,2,4]diphane is collected on a “Bruker D8 VENTURE” diffractometer (Cu–Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å, photon II detector). Crystal data for endo-[1,2,5]diphane is collected on a “Bruker APEX-II CCD” diffractometer (Ga–Kα radiation, λ = 1.34139 Å, photon II detector). Crystal data for exo-[1,2,5]diphane is collected on a “Bruker APEX-II CCD” diffractometer (Cu–Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å, photon II detector). Crystal data for Cage-2 is collected on a “Bruker D8 VENTURE” diffractometer (Ga-Kα radiation, λ = 1.34139 Å, photon II detector).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

X-ray Crystallographic Structural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Bruker X8 Kappa Apex II diffractometer using Mo Kα radiation (1–3, 6), a Bruker D8 VENTURE diffractometer using Mo Kα radiation (5), or a Bruker D8 VENTURE diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (7 and 11). Crystal data, data collection and refinement parameters are summarized in Table S1. The structures were solved using direct methods and standard difference map techniques, and were refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures on F2 with SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1981 , 2015 (link)). All hydrogen atoms bound to carbon were placed in calculated positions and refined with a riding model [Uiso(H) = 1.2–1.5Ueq(C)], while hydrogen atoms bound to boron were located on the difference map and freely refined. For 3, some carbon-bound hydrogen atoms involved in sigma interactions with potassium were also located on the difference map and freely refined. Database: CCDC Nos. 2159079-2159084 (1-3 and 5-7) and 2192622 (11) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html, or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fibril Characterization via X-ray Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibril pellets were collected by ultracentrifugation at 55,000 rpm and 25 °C for 1 h (Optima Max-TL, BECKMAN COULTER). The fibril pellet was then mounted in a loop and exposed to Cu-κ radiation from a Bruker D8 VENTURE X-ray generator at a wavelength of 0.154184 nm, and the distance was 50 mm from the source. Data were collected at room temperature for 1 min on a Bruker D8 VENTURE imaging plate detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Crystallinity Analysis of WPI-Inulin-Lactose Matrix

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystallization behaviors and the intensity of crystalline forms in the WPI-inulin-lactose matrix can be both investigated by the X-ray diffraction analysis (Bruker D8 Venture, Bruker Ltd., Germany). The samples were kept in the desiccators and incubated at 75% RH environment before measurement. The scanning range was set from 5° to 30° and the operating electric voltage and current were adjusted to 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively. Three repetitions of each sample were examined and compared at the sampling time of 0, 4 and 7 days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Microcapsules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A small amount of powder microcapsules were taken for X-ray diffraction analysis. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained by diffractometer system (Bruker D8 Venture, Bruker Ltd., Hamburg, Germany). The scanning range was set to 5–30° and the operating electric voltage and current were adjusted at 40 kV and 30 mA, respectively. A total of three repetitions of each sample were examined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TDP-43 LCD Aggregation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 20 μM of TDP-43 LCD and its variants were incubated first for 4 days. The solution mixtures were then centrifuged at 50,000 rpm for 2 h (Optima Max-TL, BECKMAN COULTER, Bera, CA, USA) and the pellets were collected. The precipitation was applied to a Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction instrument (Bruker D8 VENTURE, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany, Germany) for the measurement and the light source was Cu Kα radiation at a 1.54184Å wavelength [40 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Powder X-Ray Diffraction Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The finely powdered samples were fixed onto a Mitegen MicroMeshes sample holder (MiTeGen Co., Ithaca, NY, USA) with a minimal amount of oil. Powder diffraction data of the samples with Debye Scherer geometry were collected using a Bruker-D8 Venture (Bruker AXS. GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) diffractometer equipped with INCOATEC IμS 3.0 dual (Cu and Mo) sealed tube micro sources (50 kV, 1.4 mA). A Photon 200 Charge-integrating Pixel Array detector and CuKα (λ = 1.54178 Å) radiation was applied. Several frames were collected with various detector-sample distances in phi rotation scanning mode. Data collection and integration were carried out using the APEX3 and DiffracEva software (Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA, Version 4.2.2.3), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Crystalline Form Analysis of APIs and Polymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the crystal form of APIs and polymers, physical mixtures and freeze-dried complexes were prepared, and ultrapure API was used as a control. The finely powdered sample was fixed onto a Mitegen MicroMeshes sample holder (MiTeGen Co., Ithaca, NY, USA) with a minimal amount of oil. Powder diffraction data of the samples with Debye Scherer geometry were collected using a Bruker-D8 Venture (Bruker AXS. GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) diffractometer equipped with INCOATEC IμS 3.0 dual (Cu and Mo) sealed tube micro sources (50 kV, 1.4 mA). A Photon 200 Charge-integrating Pixel Array detector and CuKα (λ = 1.54178 Å) radiation was applied. Several frames were collected with various detector-sample distances in phi scan mode. Data collection and integration was performed using the APEX3 and DiffracEva software (Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA, Version 4.2.2.3), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR spectra, including HSQC, HMBC, COSY, and NOESY, were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE-500 instrument with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard (Bruker BioSpin group, Rheinstetten, Germany). ESI-MS and HR-ESI-MS data were obtained on a Waters LC-MS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) and Thermo Q-T of Micromass (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometers, respectively. Preparative HPLC was carried on a Waters 2767 Autopurification System (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with a DAD detector, using a Sunfire Prep C18 OBD (5 μm, 19 × 250 mm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) column. X-ray crystallography analysis was conducted on a Bruker D8 VENTURE (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) single-crystal diffractometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

X-Ray Crystallographic Structure Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Some suitable single crystals of each compound were measured. Their diffraction data were collected at 293-295 K on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer equipped with a bidimensional CMOS Photon 100 detector, using graphite monochromated Cu-Kα (λ = 1.54178 Å) radiation. The diffraction frames were integrated using the APEX3 package [57 ] and were corrected for absorptions with SADABS. The structures of all compounds were solved by intrinsic phasing [58 (link)] using the OLEX 2 program [59 (link)]. The structures were then refined with full-matrix least-squares methods based on F2 (SHELXL-2014) [58 (link)]. For the four compounds, non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. All hydrogen atoms were included in their calculated positions, assigned fixed isotropic thermal parameters, and constrained to ride on their parent atoms. A summary of the details about crystal data, collection parameters, and refinement are documented in Table 2, and additional crystallographic details are provided in the CIF files. ORTEP views were drawn using OLEX2 software [59 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!