The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanoscope 5 controller

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy

The Nanoscope V controller is a core component of Bruker's atomic force microscopy (AFM) systems. It serves as the central control unit, responsible for managing the essential functions of the AFM, such as scanner control, data acquisition, and feedback regulation. The Nanoscope V controller provides the necessary hardware and software interfaces to enable high-resolution imaging and precise measurements of surface topography and properties at the nanoscale.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

192 protocols using nanoscope 5 controller

1

Surface Potential Characterization of SnS2 Nanoplates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After Au (50 nm)/Cr (30 nm) was coated onto a SiO2 (285 nm)/Si substrate via thermal evaporation, SnS2 nanoplates (or Sn0.5W0.5S2/SnS2 heterostructures) in water were drop-casted onto the substrate. A KPFM (Dimension ICON with Nanoscope V controller, Bruker) was then used to characterize the surface potential of the SnS2 nanoplates (or Sn0.5W0.5S2/SnS2 heterostructures) at ambient conditions. The contact potential difference between the tip (PtIr) and the sample surface (VCPD), which is also referred to as the surface potential can be calculated by using the following equations: VCPD=1eφt-φf ΔVCPD=ΔVCPDfilm-ΔVCPDsubstrate ΔVCPD=1eφt-φf-1eφt-φs=1eφs-φf where φt, φs, and φf represent the work functions of the probe tip, the substrate, and the sample film, respectively.
PeakForce Tunneling atomic force microscopy (TUNA, Dimension ICON with Nanoscope V controller, Bruker) was used to investigate the current–voltage (IV) characteristics of individual SnS2 nanoplates or Sn0.5W0.5S2/SnS2 heterostructures. During the measurement, the PtIr tip was pressed against the sample with a constant force, feedback was switched to contact mode, and the voltage was linearly ramped up and down while the current signal was collected. Analysis of the IV curves was performed with the Nanoscope Analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy of ThO2 Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the ThO2 samples was studied by Atomic Force Microscopy using a MULTIMODE 8 AFM apparatus equipped with a Nanoscope 5 controller from Bruker (Germany). Sample aliquots were dispersed in pure water before a droplet was deposited onto a mica or carbon disk. The samples were imaged in the peak force tapping mode with SNL tips (K = 0.12 N nm−1, f0 = 23 kHz from Bruker) and the applied force was set at about 300 pN.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis of Lead Sulfide on Rutile Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatography grade methanol (CH3OH) was obtained from VWR. Analytical reagent grade acetone was obtained from Fisher Chemical. Lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) 99%, anhydrous sodium sulfide (Na2S) 98% and puriss. p.a. 2-propanol were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Dissolved gaseous oxygen was removed from methanol by bubbling argon through it for one hour and precursor solutions were prepared. 20 mmol L−1 lead nitrate and sodium sulfide solutions were used as precursor solutions. Rutile (TiO2) single crystals 10 mm by 5 mm by 0.5 mm, (100) faced were obtained from Crystal GmbH, Berlin, Germany. Sample substrates were sonicated in acetone for 15 minutes and for another 15 minutes in 2-propanol. SILAR was carried out in a nitrogen glovebox. Prior to starting with the SILAR cycles every substrate was immersed 30 s in fresh methanol. 1 SILAR cycle consisted of 20 s immersion in lead nitrate solution, 30 s immersion in methanol, 20 s immersion in sodium sulfide solution and 30 s immersion in methanol. After completing the desired number of SILAR cycles the substrates were immersed for 50 s in fresh methanol and dried in the glovebox. AFM images were recorded with a Bruker MultiMode equipped with a NanoScope 3a controller or a NanoScope 5 controller.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Graphene Oxide Flakes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size distribution of the GO flakes was measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on a Multimode 8 microscope with a Nano Scope 5 controller with peakforce tapping (Bruker, MA, USA). The GO dispersion (10 µg mL−1) was dropped onto a clean mica surface and dried in a desiccator overnight at room temperature. Then the GO flakes were measured using a silicon tip (tapping mode) with nominal resonance frequency of 320 kHz and nominal force constant of 42 N m−1. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed for the GO on a STA 449F3 Jupiter@ instrument (NETSCH, Deutschland, Germany), employing a heating rate of 110 °C mim−1 (from 25 to 750 °C) with a synthetic air flow of 50 mL min−1. X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) to structurally characterise the GO was performed on an Advanced Eco D8 XDR instrument (Bruker, MA, USA), using a Cu Kα1 radiation (λ: 1.5406 Å) at 40 kV in the range of 2θ = 5–90°. For surface chemistry analysis, the GO was characterised using attenuated total reflection Fourier infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR, Nicolet, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA); and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA), applying a pass energy of 200 eV and 50 eV to obtain the survey and high-resolution spectra, respectively. Raman confocal spectroscopy was employed for structural defects characterisation in GO with laser 532 nm (Horiba®, Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy of Amyloid Fibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fibril samples were diluted 1:100 for Sup35NM and 20 µl droplets were deposited on freshly cleaved mica discs (Agar Scientific F7013). After 10 min incubation at room temperature, excess sample was removed by washing with 1 ml of 0.2 µm syringe-filtered mQ H 2 O and the specimens were then dried under a gentle stream of N 2 (g). For Aβ42 fibrils, samples were diluted 1:10 and 10 µl were deposited on mica disc, let dry at room temperature, washed with 500 µl of mQ H 2 O and then dried under a gentle stream of N 2 (g). Samples were imaged using a Bruker Multimode AFM with a Nanoscope V controller and a ScanAsyst probe (Silicone nitride tip with nominal tip radius = 2 nm, nominal spring constant 0.4 N/m and nominal resonant frequency 70 kHz). Images were captured at a resolution of 4.88 nm per pixel scanned. All images were processed using the Nanoscope analysis software (version 1.5, Bruker). The image baseline was flattened using 3 rd order baseline correction to remove tilt and bow. Processed image files were opened and analyzed using automated scripts written in Matlab (Xue, 2013) . the data, and managed the research. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. * Median values in [psi -][PIN + ] yeast cells; † (Lund and Cox, 1981) ; ‡ (Lancaster et al., 2010)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Biofilm Topography: DNase I Impact

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The topography of the bio lms with and without DNase I treatment (12 h) was investigated using a MultiMode 8 AFM with a NanoScope V controller (Bruker). The scanning modes used were as follows: 1) ScanAsyst mode using ScanAsyst-Air cantilevers with 0.4 N m -1 nominal spring constant (Bruker) and 2) tapping mode using RTESP cantilevers with 40 N m -1 nominal spring constant (Bruker) [39] . A scan size of 10×10 μm was used. Images were processed and analysed using NanoScope Analysis (Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Nanomechanical Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative nanomechanical analysis of the samples was conducted using a MultiMode 8 with a NanoScope V controller equipped with a J-type scanner (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), using the PeakForce QNM mode. PFQNM is based on the Peak Force Tapping mode, wherein the material property mapping is based on the individual force vs. the separation curves obtained from each tap (Figure 1a) [41 (link)]. Each force curve represents a deflection of the probe lever relative to the change in the z-axis piezo position (Figure 1b). The shift in deflection is caused by differences in the interaction between the tip and the sample surface. The force curve is logged for each map pixel of the scanned image, which provides the mapping of all the investigated properties in a single scan line.
Each scan was performed with a 1 Hz rate and a scan size of 512 × 512 points, which is equivalent to a 262,144 force vs. separation curves. For each of the tested samples, scans of three noncontiguous areas of 10 × 10 μm were collected. Measurements were conducted at room temperature and 40% relative humidity. The z-range was set on 300 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

AFM Imaging of Medin Aggregation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For AFM imaging, 100 μL was removed from the microcentrifuge tube taken at times corresponding to different stages of the ThT plate aggregation: before agitation, immediately after detecting an increase of fluorescence in the wells, and 2 h after the plateau of the aggregation curve was reached. 5 μL of each of these medin samples was added on a freshly peeled mica surface (muscovite mica V-1 quality from Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) glued to a metal specimen disk (Ted Pella, Redding, CA) and dried for 3 h inside a vacuum desiccator. For AFM imaging, 60 μL of HEPES buffer was added on mica, and the sample was transferred to the AFM sample stage. AFM imaging was performed in PeakForce Tapping mode using the fluid cell of a Multimode 8 AFM (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA) equipped with a NanoScope V controller (Bruker). PEAKFORCE-HIRS-F-B cantilevers (Bruker) were used. Values of 0.079 N/m were measured for the cantilever spring constant using the Thermal tune calibration method (72 ) implemented in the AFM used. The nominal tip radius is 1 nm, according to specifications by the manufacturer. All image analysis was performed using the NanoScope analysis software v 1.7 (Bruker). The particle analysis option included in this software was used to estimate the volume of medin species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atomic Force Microscopy of Mica Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Topographic data were acquired by a multimode 8 microscope equipped with a Nanoscope V controller (Bruker, Santa Barbara, USA). Before use, a freshly cleaved V-1 grade muscovite mica (Nanoandmore, Wetzlar, Germany) sheet was pretreated with 10 µL of NiCl 2 (2-10 mM) and dried under the nitrogen gas. A 2 µL aliquot of a sample solution was deposited on the mica, after which the mica was incubated for 3 min, then dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas.
All imaging was conducted with the PeakForce Tapping mode and ScanAsyst mode at a rate of ∼1.0 Hz; the resolution was set to either 512 or 1024 pixels per scan line. The SCANASYST-AIR-HR cantilever was employed with nominal values of k = 0.4 N m -1 , F q = 130 kHz and tip radius = 2 nm (Bruker probes, Camarillo, CA, USA). Whenever the ScanAsyst mode was applied, a semi-manual control was on during the imaging procedure to manually adjust the set point and gain in order to reduce the tip-sample interactions to the minimum. The ramp size was kept constant at 150 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of CNF and Matrigel Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-resolution images of CNF coating were recorded on a MultiMode 8 AFM with a NanoScope V controller and an E scanner (Bruker, Santa Barbara CA, USA) in dry conditions using ScanAsyst mode and ScanAsyst-Air probes (Bruker). For Matrigel coating, high-resolution images were recorded using a NanoWizard IV XP BioScience AFM (JPK-Bruker, Berlin, Germany) in liquid (1 x DPBS+) using ScanAsyst Fluid + probes.
Microstructure images of the coated probes were acquired with a Zeiss SIGMA VP field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) at the beam voltage of 1 kV, using type II secondary electrons (SE2), and reaching a working distance of 5.5 mm and magnification of 1,300×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!