The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using d7d2z

1

Histological Analysis of Islet Grafts in Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Livers containing islet grafts were procured from recipient mice, fixed in 10% formalin neutral buffer solution, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5 μm-thick sections. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was preformed according to standard protocols. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously reported.25 (link) Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: antiinsulin (1:2000; Proteintech, Tokyo, Japan), anti-CD4 (1:100; D7D2Z, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD8α (1:400; D4W2Z, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD31 (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-F4/80 (1:50; Novus Biologicals), followed by incubation for 40 min with a biotinylated secondary antibody diluted 1:300 in PBS. Sections were washed with PBS before addition of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (1:100 in biotinylated secondary antibody; ABC-Elite, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 50 min. After washing in PBS, the color reaction was carried out using diaminobenzidine and nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. The number of positively stained lymphocytes that had infiltrated into the islet grafts was counted in all lobes of the liver (at the maximum cross section, which contained about 10 islets in total). The areas of liver sections that stained positively for insulin were measured and analyzed using NIH Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Spleen CD4 and Neutrophil Elastase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) spleens were sectioned at 3 μm thickness on SuperFrost+ slides. IHC staining of spleen sections for CD4 (1:200, D7D2Z; Cell Signaling Technology) and neutrophil elastase (1:200, E8U3X; Cell Signaling Technology) was performed using a Leica BOND™ RX auto-stainer (Leica, Nussloch, Germany) with the BOND Polymer Refine Detection (Leica) kit and developed with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen. The stained slides were mounted in Dako Mounting Medium (Dako) and coverslipped using a Dako coverslipper.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues were cut into 4 µm sections and stained with anti-CD4 (1:100, D7D2Z, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA) or anti-CD8 mAb (1:400, D4W2Z, Cell Signaling) by the HRP method, followed by standard chromogenic immunohistochemistry protocol. A detailed method is shown in online supplemental methods. Stained slides were scanned on a DP80 microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) and digital images were viewed using cellSens (OLYMPUS). CD4+T cells and CD8+T cells were counted in randomly selected five different high-power fields to obtain an average number for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunomodulation Strategies for Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti‐mouse PD‐1 antibody (BE0273; Bioxcell) was administered via intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 200 µg per mouse. Rat immunoglobulin G 2a (BE0089, Bioxcell) was used as a control twice per week for four weeks (Figure 3A). To deplete CD8 T and CD4 T cells, 200 µg of anti‐mouse CD8α (BE0004‐1; Bioxcell), 200 µg of anti‐mouse CD4 (BE0003‐3; Bioxcell), or 200 µg of rat IgG2a (BE0089; Bioxcell) as an isotype control were administered via intraperitoneal injection shown in Figure 6E. Depletion efficiency was determined by IHC using anti‐CD8 antibody (14.0808.82; eBioscience) and anti‐CD4 antibody (D7D2Z; Cell Signaling Technology).
To neutralize IFN‐γ, mice were intraperitoneally injected with antibodies against IFN‐γ (1.25 mg kg−1, BE0312; BioXcell). Polyclonal Armenian hamster IgG (BE0091; BioXcell) was used as a control (Figure 6E).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Skin Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All staining experiments were done on 4-μm-thick sections from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin. Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to visualize general histological architecture. We used anti-human CD4 (1:2000, EPR6855, Abcam, The Netherlands), anti-mouse CD3 (1:200, D7A6E, Cell Signaling Technology, The Netherlands), anti-mouse CD4 (1:100, D7D2Z, Cell Signaling Technology, The Netherlands), anti-mouse CD8 (1:1600, 4SM15, eBioscience™, The Netherlands), and anti-phospho-Stat3 (1:150, D3A7, Cell Signaling Technology, The Netherlands). The scanner (3DHISTECH, Panoramic 250) was used for microscopic examination and image acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Staining of Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staining of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections was performed using rabbit–anti-mouse CD3ε antibody (1:150, D4V8L; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA), CD4 antibody (1:100, D7D2Z; Cell Signaling) or CD8a antibody (1:400, D4W2Z; Cell Signaling) by the horseradish peroxidase (HRP) method. Antigen retrieval was performed with Citrate Unmasking Solution (Cell Signaling). Before incubation with HRP (Histofine Simple Stain Mouse MAX PO (R), Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan), DAB Substrate Kit (Vector Labs, Burlingame, California, USA) was used for visualization of signal. Isotype-matched rabbit IgG was used as a negative staining control. Stained slides were scanned on a DP80 microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) and digital images were viewed using cellSens (OLYMPUS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

IHC Staining of Mouse Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Sigma) and embedded in paraffin, then sectioned (5 μm) onto glass slides. Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated using a standard histology protocol. Antigen retrieval was performed using 10 mM sodium citrate pH 6.0 buffer and a Decloaking chamber at 120°C. The slides were stained using an Autostainer Plus (Dako) with TBST rinse buffer (Dako). The following antibodies were used for IHC: anti-CD4 (Cell Signaling, D7D2Z, 1:100), anti-CD8 (Cell Signaling, D4W2Z, 1:400), anti-CD3 (Biocare Medical, 1:100), and anti-CD19 (Cell Signaling, D4V4B, 1:800). Detection consisted of Rabbit Boost (Cell Signaling) HRP polymer used with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Dako). Slides were finally counterstained with hematoxylin (Dako). Images were captured with an Olympus AX70 microscope using the Q-Capture Pro7 Program. H&E stained sections and immunohistochemistry of lymphoid malignancies and polycystic changes were evaluated by two board-certified pathologists including a veterinary pathologist (LHR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence analysis of lung sections from M.tb infected mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung sections from M.tb infected mice were subjected to deparaffinization and antigen retrieval prior to blocking for 1 h with 10% goat serum and 1% FBS in a humidified chamber (Wu et al., 2019 (link)). The sections were incubated at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD4 (rabbit mAb D7D2Z, Cell Signaling), LAG3 (rat mAb C9BZW, BioLegend), CD49b (biotin labeled rat mAb DX5, BioLegend), and IL-10 (rat Mab MT60, MABTECH). After washing PBS were incubated for 1 h with secondary antibodies Alexa 488 labeled donkey F(ab´)2 anti-rabbit IgG and Alexa 647 labeled donkey F(ab´)2 anti-rat IgG (Abcam) and Alexa-647 labeled streptavidin (BioLegend). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. All fluorescence images were captured using an Olympus FV 1000 Spectral Confocal system. Mean fluorescence intensity of cells was determined using Image J (version 2.0.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!