The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using elexsys e500

1

Quantitative EPR Analysis of Radical Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanoparticle samples were filtered and washed three times with pH 11 water and once with DDW before DMPO (Dojindo) was added (1 vol%), and were then kept in dark conditions as much as possible prior to measuring. Spectra were obtained on a Bruker Elexsys E 500 spectrometer with an SHQE cavity at 7 mW microwave intensity. Samples were loaded into four quartz capillaries for measurement. Samples were first measured in dark to provide a baseline signal, then were illuminated with 365 nm light for 30 s and immediately re-measured. Quantification of the radical products was accomplished by fitting the spectra to a sum of the theoretical spectra using the following hyperfine coupling constants to simulate each adduct. DMPO-OH: aN = 14.90 G, aHβ = 14.93 G; DMPO-OOH: aN = 14.2 G, aHβ = 11.4 G, aHγ1 = 1.2 G. Quantification was done by calculating the double integral of the fit spectrum and normalizing the resulting area by the sample absorbance at 365 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Continuous Wave EPR Spectroscopy Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPR spectroscopy was performed at the CalEPR center at the University of California, Davis. Continuous wave (CW) EPR spectra were collected on a Bruker Biospin EleXsys E500 spectrometer equipped with a super high Q resonator (ER4122SHQE). Cryogenic temperature was achieved by using an ESR900 liquid helium cryostat with a temperature controller (Oxford Instrument ITC503) and a gas flow controller. CW EPR spectra were recorded under slow-passage, non-saturating conditions with the following spectrometer settings: conversion time = 60 ms (sweep time = 60 s for 1000 data points), modulation amplitude = 0.5 mT, modulation frequency = 100 kHz. Other experimental parameters are given in the corresponding figure captions. Simulations of EPR spectra were performed in Matlab R2018a with the EasySpin 5.2.15 toolbox.19 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural and Luminescent Properties of PG and TGC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD patterns of PG and TGC were characterized by a powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Miniflex600) at a scanning rate of 2.5°/min and a step size of 0.02° (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.154 nm). DSC (Netzsch, STA449F3) was carried out by heating ~20 mg of PG grains in an air atmosphere (α-Al2O3 crucible) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Microstructure characterization was performed by TEM (ThermoFisher Talos F200X), which operated at 200 kV. Steady-state, PersL/PSL and TL spectra were measured by a spectrophotometer (Edinburgh Instruments, FS920) equipped with a 450 W xenon lamp as the excitation source and a photomultiplier tube (R943-02, Hamamatsu) as the detector. The kinetic scanning mode of FS920 was utilized to record the PersL/PSL decay curve and the TL spectrum. To measure the PSL decay curve, an 808 nm NIR laser was used as the pumping source, which can be operated either in continuous or periodic mode. For the TL test, a cooling/heating stage (Linkam THMS600E) was used as the sample holder. X-band EPR spectra were obtained using an EPR spectrometer (Bruker, ELEXSYS E500) at a frequency of 9.826 GHz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Magnetic Characterization of Cs2Ag(Bi:Fe)Br6

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic susceptibility measurements were performed in the commercial Quantum Design magnetic property measurement system (MPMS3). Lots of small Cs2Ag(Bi:Fe)Br6 crystals with a total mass of 29.9 mg were loaded into a polycrystalline sample holder, which was fixed in a brass sample rod. Both ZFC and FC procedures were used to check possible magnetic transition in this compound. ESR was performed with a Bruker Elexsys E500 spectrometer operating at about 9.3 GHz. ESR spectra were recorded in dark. Cs2Ag(Bi:Fe)Br6 and Cs2AgBiBr6 crystal powder samples were prepared via collecting many randomly oriented small crystals into sealed and evacuated quartz tubes and placed in an He-flow cryostat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pulsed X-Band EPR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CW X-Band EPR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Elexsys E500 spectrometer equipped with a SHQ cavity (ν = 9.39 GHz). Low temperature measurements were obtained using an Oxford Instruments ESR900 continuous flow helium cryostat. Pulsed EPR measurements were carried out with a Bruker Elexsys E580 at X-band (ν ≅ 9.70 GHz) equipped with a flexline dielectric ring ENDOR resonator (Bruker EN 4118X-MD4). Temperatures between 4.5 and 100 K were obtained with an Oxford Instruments CF935 continuous flow helium cryostat. Echo detected field swept EPR spectra were recorded by using the Hahn Echo pulse sequence (π/2 – τ – π – τ – echo) with a fixed interpulse delay time τ = 200 ns, tπ/2 = 16 ns and tπ = 32 ns. Both phase memory times were measured by using the Hahn Echo sequence upon increasing the interpulse delay τ starting from τ = 98 ns. Spin-lattice relaxation times were measured using the standard inversion recovery sequence (π – td – π/2 – τ – π – τ – echo), with π/2 = 16 ns. The uncertainty in T1 estimated from replicate measurements was 5–10% depending upon the signal-to-noise ratio at a given temperature-field combination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Frozen Solution ESR Spectroscopy of Cu2+ Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Bruker CW-ESR spectrometer (Elexsys E500, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) driven by a PC running the XEpr program and equipped with a Super-X microwave bridge (ER 049X) operating at 9.3–9.5 GHz and a SHQE probe head were used throughout the work. All frozen solution ESR spectra of Cu2+ complexes were recorded at 150 K by means of an ER4131VT variable temperature unit. A small amount of methanol (up to 10%) was added to the Cu2+-Ctr1 samples in order to increase spectral resolution. Parallel spin Hamiltonian parameters were taken directly from the experimental spectra and were always calculated from the 2nd and 3rd line to get rid of errors coming from second order effects [55 (link)]. The resolution of the ESR spectra [56 (link)] was improved by using isotopically pure 63Cu(NO3)2 (0.05 M). In order to achieve a better determination of the magnetic parameters, some of the experimental spectra were simulated by the program Monoclin [57 (link),58 (link)], which is able to discriminate one or more species [57 (link)]. Instrumental settings of frozen solution ESR spectra were as follows: number of scans, 4; microwave frequency, 9.425–9.429 GHz; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 0.7 mT; time constant, 163 ms; sweep time, 2.8 min; microwave power, 20 mW; receiver gain, 60 dB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Continuous Wave EPR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two continuous wave EPR spectrometers were employed: A Bruker Elexsys E500 with Bruker ER4102ST rectangular cavity and a Varian E-9 magnet with E-101 microwave bridge (X-band, ∼9.5 GHz) with super-high Q ER4122SHQE cylindrical cavity. Oxford ESR910/ESR900 Liquid He cryostat operating below 2 and 4 K were used with the two spectrometers, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

EPR Spectroscopic Analysis of Cu(II)-Loaded PlAA10

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cu(II)-loaded PlAA10 was produced as previously described.15 (link) Protein samples (concentration around 200 μM)
for continuous-wave EPR were prepared in either 50 mM MES buffer (pH
6.5) or 50 mM Tris·H2SO4 buffer (pH 8.5).
EPR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Elexsys E500 spectrometer (Bruker,
Karlsruhe, Germany) operating at X-band at 120 K (BVT 3000 digital
temperature controller) with the following acquisition parameters:
modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 5 G; conversion
time, 90 ms; sweep time, 92.1 s; and microwave power, 20 mW. EPR spectra
were simulated using the EasySpin toolbox developed for MATLAB.27 (link) The optimum Hamiltonian parameters have been
obtained using the second order perturbation, and then, an exact diagonalization
has been used for the final simulations. Pseudo-modulation treatment
of the spectra was performed to graphically extract the exact number
of nitrogen centers contributing to the superhyperfine pattern.28 (link),29 (link)AN constants were considered isotropic
and used in the final simulation of the first-derivative spectra.
The Hamiltonian used for the simulations is the following equation with i =
the number of nitrogen
centers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

EPR Spectroscopy of Paramagnetic Centers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EPR spectra were recorded at room
temperature with a Bruker spectrometer ELEXSYS-E500 (X-band, sensitivity
up to 1010 spin/G). For investigating the photoactivity and behavior
of paramagnetic centers (PCs), the samples were illuminated directly
in the cavity of the spectrometer with the use of a 50 W high-pressure
mercury lamp. The concentration of PCs was evaluated using a CuCl2·2H2O monocrystal with a known number of spins
as the standard. The EPR spectra simulation permitting determination
of g-factor values of radicals was carried out with
the use of the EasySpin MATLAB toolbox. EPR spectra analysis was carried
out using a computer program package developed by Prof. A. Kh. Vorob′ev
(Chemistry Department, M. Lomonosov Moscow State University) and kindly
provided to us.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Catalyst Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies and elemental mapping of series catalysts were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss, sigma500, Jena, Germany) with an Oxford Ultim Max Large Area SDD EDS detector. The size of catalysts was measured by a laser particle size analyzer (Malvern, MS-2000, Malvern, UK). The crystallographic structures of catalysts were characterized by a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, JEM-2100, Tokyo, Japan) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku Corporation, XRD-6000, Tokyo, Japan). The specific surface area and pore size distribution of samples were analyzed by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) methods, respectively. A Fourier-transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR, American Nicolet Corp. Model 170-SX, Green Bay, WI, USA) was used to investigate the chemical structures of the catalyst. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, ESCALAB250Xi, Waltham, MA, USA) was utilized to study the surface chemical composition of catalysts. To study the catalytic mechanism of CDM, an electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer (Bruker ELEXSYS E500, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to obtain the EPR signals. The leaching of Cu and Mn in wastewater was detected by an inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (Agilent 5800 ICP-OES, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!