The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Von frey filament

Manufactured by Ugo Basile
Sourced in Italy

The Von Frey filaments are a set of calibrated nylon monofilaments used to measure mechanical sensory thresholds. They are designed to apply a standardized amount of force to the skin, allowing for the assessment of tactile sensitivity and mechanical pain thresholds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

52 protocols using von frey filament

1

Mechanical Allodynia Assessment in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A von Frey filament (Ugo Basile, Italy) test was used to evaluate pain sensation in the rats a day before surgery and on days 3 and 7 post-injury. Assessment of the mechanical threshold was done with the up–down method [20 (link)]. Rats were placed on a mesh floor covered with an inverted transparent plastic box until exploratory behavior ceased. Nine individual von Frey filaments with forces of 0.4, 0.6, 1.0, 1.4, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 g (Ugo Basile, Italy) were applied to the central region of the plantar surface of the hind paw, and the paw withdrawal threshold (g) was observed. The weakest stimulation that caused the withdrawal response was set as the threshold value.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mechanical Hyperalgesia Assessment via von Frey Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate mechanical hyperalgesia, we conducted a manual “ascending stimulus” von Frey test on the subject's right hind paw. The tested animals were placed in clear animal enclosures with an open floor that was located on top of a grid floor stand. Each von Frey filament of different stiffness (0.08, 0.02, 0.04, 0.07, 0.16, 0.4, 0.6, and 1 gram; Ugo Basile) was applied to the lateral side of the subjects' hind paws until it bent. When a positive response was recorded, application of the same filament was repeated. Three out of five positive responses indicated the withdrawal threshold for that paw. Five‐minute intervals were allowed between the trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mechanical and Thermal Sensitivity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mice were given 30 min in Plexiglas chambers with a wire net floor to become accustomed to their new environment. A von Frey filament (Aesthesio, Ugo Basile, Italy) was utilized in order to perform mechanical threshold testing. Filaments of varying weights from 0.008 to 2.0 g were applied orthogonally to the plantar surface, commencing with the minimum force and advancing in an increasing manner. A positive response was deemed to be paw withdrawal, flinching, or paw licking. The “updown” method was used to calculate the 50% PWT. The researchers conducting the tests were blinded to the experimental groups.
The assessment of thermal hyperalgesia was conducted using a thermal testing apparatus (No. 37370, Ugo Basile, Italy) to measure the PWL. The rodents were positioned on a raised glass surface and given a half hour to acclimate before the examination. A thermal stimulator emitting radiant energy was directed toward the planta pedis of the experimental hind paw with the aid of a glass floor. The criterion utilized for a positive reaction was the elevation or licking of the posterior paw, and the duration required to achieve the criterion was documented as the PWL. In order to avoid any potential harm to the tissue, a time limit of 20 s was established.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Locomotor Assessment in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After IDD, locomotor performance was assessed using the von Frey, horizontal ladder, and tail suspension tests. The von Frey test was used to evaluate behavior in response to pain once a week postoperatively. The rats were maintained to adapt to the testing environment for 15 min before measurement. The latency of the paw withdrawal response was measured by applying mechanical stimulation to the center of both hind paws using the von Frey filament (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy). A positive avoidance response was indicated by lifting, whipping, licking, or rubbing the paw during stimulation, and the average value of three or more measurements was used. In the horizontal ladder test, the rats were made to walk on the metal runway (2.5 cm between grids) from left to right three times, and their movements were captured with a digital camcorder. The ladder score was calculated as follows:
The tail suspension test was performed as previously described [17 (link)]. The suspension box was made of acrylic (35 depth × 35 width × 80 cm height) with a ceiling steel hook to suspend the rats in the center. The rats were suspended 50 cm above the floor using adhesive tape attached approximately 3 cm from the tail tip. Immobility (extending without moving) and mobility (attempting to reach a floor or wall) were recorded for 6 min and analyzed by an observer blinded to the experimental conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in Sciatic Nerve Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In examining sciatic nerve sensory functionality, the threshold of paw withdrawal was measured in response to mechanical stimulation with the aid of von Frey filament (Ugo Basile, Italy); 10 filaments were selected.[20 (link)] The rats were kept in plastic cages with a metal mesh basement and were allowed to be accustomed to the environment for 10 min before testing. von Frey filaments with the order of forces, 4.17 g, 4.31 g, 4.56 g, 4.74 g, 4.93 g, 5.07 g, 5.18 g, 5.46 g, 5.88 g, and 6.1 g, were applied to the plantar surface of the hind paw. Each paw was tested 5 times, mechanical pain threshold was estimated according to the up and down method used by Bonin et al.[21 (link)]
Pre-induction (Pre-I or BL) nociceptive threshold were assessed (2 days before CCI) with von Frey filament to determine the basal threshold, post-induction (Post-I) nociceptive threshold were assessed 3 days after CCI intervention and then on the 10th, 17th, and 24th day of the commencement of drug treatments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating OA Pain Relief Strategies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pain-related behavior of OA rats after intra-articular injection of various therapeutic agents was evaluated by weight-bearing index (WBI) by a 3D gait analysis system (Kinama Tracer, Japan) and paw-withdrawal threshold (PWT) by the von Frey filament (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy). Briefly, for WBI detection, rats walked along the runway equipped with mechanical sensors, which can record the ground reaction force for each foot, reacting to the weight supported by the corresponding limb. The values were represented by the following formula: WBI = ipsilateral weight/(ipsilateral weight + contralateral weight) × 100%. PWT was conducted to evaluate the efficacy on pain threshold as described previously (Micheli et al., 2019 (link)). In addition, PWT, reflecting the mechanical allodynia (hypersensitivity), was investigated according to the force exerted by the von Frey filament ranging from 0 to 40 g with a .2-g accuracy. The paw sensitivity threshold was recorded as the minimum force for leading to a strong and immediate withdrawal reflex of the paw.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mechanical Allodynia Assessment in Neuropathic Pain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Changes in the mechanical paw withdrawal threshold were measured at 1, 4, 7, and 14 days after nerve or sham surgery. Rats were habituated for 10 min to the testing cages, which consisted of metal mesh floors under plastic domes. Mechanical allodynia was measured by assessing thresholds for hind paw withdrawal upon stimulation with an electrically controlled von Frey filament (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy). Licking or rapid withdrawal of the hind paw was considered a positive response. Mechanical forces were recorded for each withdrawal. The responses were measured seven times, and the means were calculated after the maximum and minimum values were excluded. Nociceptive tests were performed after MCS in awake rats for 10 days. Electrodes were connected to a stimulator (A385, WPI, Sarasota, FL, USA) for repetitive MCS. For MCS, the M1 of awake animals were stimulated for 30 min (continuously at 50 μA, 50 Hz, and 300 μs pulses). Sham MCS group underwent the same procedure without any electrical stimulation. After the last behavioral test, the animals were anesthetized with urethane (1.25 mg/kg, i.p.), and tissue was collected for western blot and immunohistochemistry assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mechanical Allodynia Assessment in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sciatic cuff group: In a subset of animals, von Frey testing was performed 7 d after surgery as previously described (Torres-Rodriguez et al., 2023 (link)). Male mice were habituated in the von Frey apparatus in a red-lit room for 2 h prior to testing. The smallest filament that elicited a paw withdrawal response in at least three of five trials was taken as the mechanical threshold for each hindpaw. Tactile sensitivity was determined for both hindpaws by an experimenter blind to pain treatment.
CCI-ION group: We confirmed the presence of CCI-induced, mechanical allodynia in subset of mice (5 sham and 5 CCI-ION, male ∼10 weeks old) using a 1.4 g von Frey filament (Ugo Basile). Mice were gently held in the hand of the experimenter, and the filament was applied to the dorsal edge of the vibrissae pad ipsilateral to the ligated nerve. The number of nocifensive responses to five applications of the filament was recorded. Nocifensive responses were defined as the animal actively withdrawing its head or aggressively biting or swiping at the filament. We tested for differences in the fraction of nocifensive responses between groups at each time point (pre-surgery/baseline and again 1 and/or 2 weeks after surgery) using a mixed-effects model with Sidak's post hoc multiple-comparisons test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mechanical Allodynia Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical allodynia was evaluated through mechanical touch sensitivity using a blunt probe (Von Frey filament, 0.5 mm diameter, ranging up to 10 g in 10 s) on central plantar surface of hind-paw by dynamic plantar aesthesiometer (UgoBasile, Gemonio, Italy). Responses to mechanical stimuli (Paw Withdrawal Thresholds, PWT) were expresses in grams (g) [29 (link)]. Three different measurements for each paw were recorded and the mean calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Functional Recovery Assessment After Stenosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used three tests to assess functional recovery after inducing stenosis. The Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) scale was performed as previously described [26 (link)]. Two independent observers analyzed the hindlimb motion in an open field for 4 min. The average value was used for analysis. The ladder walking test was used to test the ability of rats to maintain balance. Rats walked on a metal runway (2.5 cm between grids) from left to right three times, and their movements were recorded with a digital camera. The score was calculated as follows: ladder score (%) = erroneous steps of the hind limb/total steps of the hind limb × 100 [26 (link)]. Locomotor functions were examined in each group every 7 days until sacrifice. The Von Frey test was used to measure the response of the rats to pain. We measured the latencies of paw withdrawals in response to mechanical stimulation applied to the center of both hind paws using a Von Frey filament (Ugo Basile, Varese, Italy). The average value from three or more measurements was used. All locomotor tests were recorded using a digital camera and were assessed by two observers who were blinded to the treatment conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!