The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using cpgenome universal methylated and unmethylated dna

1

Methylation Analysis of TGFBI Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, USA). Genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite, and the methylation status of the promoter region SQC, Squamous cell carcinoma: ADC, adenocarcinoma of the TGFBI gene was analysed using MSP with primers specific to either unmethylated or methylated alleles. Primers used for the methylated reaction were 5′-GCCGCCCGCTTG CCCGTCGGTC-3′ (sense) and 5′-AAACCCGCCAAAATCGC GACG-3′ (antisense) primers. Primers used for the unmethylated reaction were 5′-GCTGCCTGCTTGCCTGTTGGTT-3′ (sense) and 5′-AAACCCACCAAAATCACAACA-3′ (antisense). All polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were carried out using reagents supplied in the GeneAmp DNA Amplification Kit using AmpliTaq Gold as the polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems, USA) on a PTC-100 instrument (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA). CpGenome™ Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, USA) was used as the positive controls for methylated and unmethylated genes, respectively. Negative control samples without added DNA were included for each PCR run. PCR products were analysed on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. Each MSP run was repeated at least once to confirm the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bisulfite-Based DNA Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from cultured cells and primary tumor tissues by the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and subjected to bisulfite treatment with the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Bisulfite-modified DNA was amplified with PCR primers, and the purified products were assayed on the PyroMark Q96MD System (Qiagen), as previously described (Kim et al. 2018 (link)). The bisulfite PCR primer and sequencing primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The degree of methylation was expressed for each DNA locus as the percentage of methylated cytosines among all cytosine residues (methylated and unmethylated), and the methylation level was calculated from the mean methylation percentage of the six CpG sites evaluated. Non-CpG cytosine residues were used as built-in controls to verify bisulfite conversion. Three controls were included for each pyrosequencing run. One well was filled with water to ensure no contamination, and two wells were filled with CpGenome universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) as positive and negative controls, respectively, to assess the repeatability of the assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Alu Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alu methylation analysis was quantitatively performed on the bisulfite-treated DNA using pyrosequencing with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and conditions previously described (Bollati et al., 2007 (link)). In brief, the bisulfite-treated samples (50 ng) were amplified with a biotin-labeled primer via PCR, which enables the conversion of the PCR product to a single-stranded DNA template suitable for pyrosequencing. Confirmation of the quality of the PCR products and their freedom from contamination was established on 2% agarose gels with ethidium bromide staining. After purification of PCR products using Sepharose beads on PyroMark Vacuum Prep Workstation (Qiagen), pyrosequencing was carried out using the PyroMark Q96MD System (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions, including a single-strand binding protein. The percentage of methylatation was expressed for each DNA locus as % 5-mC divided by the sum of methylated and unmethylated cytosines. We tested each marker 3 times and used the average percentage in the statistical analysis. Three controls were included in every pyrosequencing run. One well was filled with water to ensure no contamination, and 2 wells were filled with CpGenome Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, USA) to evaluate the repeatability of the assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Methylation-Specific PCR Assay for DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from whole-blood samples using the QIAamp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, USA). One microgram of DNA was bisulfite-modified using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (Zymo Research, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Final elution was performed with 30 μl of M-Elution Buffer (Zymo Research) and DNA was stored at −70°C until analyzed. The methylation status of the each gene was determined by nested methylation-specific PCR (MSP). External PCR was performed with the flanking primers of target gene promoter, diluted at 1:200 and then subjected to the internal PCR that incorporated unmethylated or methylated primers. The respective primer sequences are listed in Table 1. All PCR amplifications were carried out using reagents supplied in the GeneAmp DNA Amplification Kit with AmpliTaq Gold as the polymerase on a PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Research, USA). CpGenome™ Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, USA) was used as a positive control for the methylated and unmethylated genes, respectively. Negative control samples without DNA were included for each set of PCR. PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. Each MSP was repeated at least once to confirm the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pyrosequencing-based DNA Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bisulfite-converted DNA was amplified with PCR primers under previously described conditions [20 (link)]. The PCR products were then assayed on the PyroMark Q24 with PyroMark Gold Q24 Reagents (Qiagen) and then analyzed with accompanying software. The degree of methylation was expressed for each DNA locus as a percentage of methylated cytosines over the sum of methylated and unmethylated cytosines. We used non-CpG cytosine residues as built-in controls to verify the bisulfite conversion. In every pyrosequencing run, three controls were included. One well was filled with water to ensure no contamination, and two wells were filled with CpGenome universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) as positive and negative control to weigh the repeatability of the assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of miR-135a Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was chemically modified using a EZ DNA Methylation‐Gold kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The methylation status of miR‐135a MPR (−23 675 to −23 876 bp) was quantitatively determined by pyrosequencing. Briefly, bisulfate‐modified DNA was amplified using forward primer 5′‐GGGTAGGTAAGGGTTTAGGT‐3′ and reverse primer biotin‐5′‐CAAACTCCTAAAAAACCCCATTC‐3′. The PCR product quality was confirmed by electrophoresing on 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. After purification of the PCR product with Sepharose beads on a PyroMark Vaccum Prep Workstation (Qiagen), pyrosequencing was performed according to the manufacturer's specifications using a sequencing primer (5′‐GGTAAGGGTTTAGGTTG‐3′) and PyroMark Q96MD System (Qiagen). The average methylation index (MI) was calculated from the mean methylation percentage of the nine evaluated CpG sites. To set the controls for pyrosequencing, CpGenome™ Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon) with stable levels of methylation was used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Each pyrosequencing was repeated at least twice to confirm the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Wrap53α Promoter Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). After treatment of the genomic DNA with sodium bisulfite, the methylation status of Wrap53α promoter encompassing the transcription start site was analyzed using MSP with primers specific for either unmethylated or methylated alleles. The primer sequences for Wrap53α were described in Table II. All polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifications were carried out using reagents supplied in a GeneAmp DNA Amplification kit with AmpliTaq Gold as the polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on a PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA). CpGenome™ Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) was used as a positive control for the methylated and unmethylated genes, respectively. Negative control samples without DNA were included for each set of PCR. PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. Each MSP was repeated at least once to confirm the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!