The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Software 17

Manufactured by MedCalc
Sourced in United States

MedCalc Software 17 is a statistical software package designed for medical research and clinical practice. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, regression analysis, and more. The software is regularly updated to ensure compatibility with the latest operating systems and to incorporate new statistical methods.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using software 17

1

Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean ± SD. There was no patient excluded due to the lack of data in our analysis. The diagnostic performance of the DL algorithm and observers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and pairwise comparisons of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) according to the DeLong method21 (link). Survival was estimated by means of the Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test. A median value of Hilmus (cutoff value: 104 mm) in CXR images was used to divide groups for the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using standard statistical software packages (SPSS software 21.0; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA, and MedCalc Software 17; Mariakerke, Belgium). Statistical significance was defined by p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Predicting Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD of the normal distribution, while the non-normal continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range). Wilcoxon W test or Kruskal Wallis test was used to assess the differences among groups. We performed a univariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate the correlation between EIPH and clinical variables, laboratory data, echocardiographic data, and probability of PH calculated by the AI model. The independence of the association between the variables was tested using multiple logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and pairwise comparisons of the AUC according to the DeLong method (16 (link)). To evaluate the effectiveness of the AI model to predict EIPH, two models were constructed and compared using ROC curve analysis. Model 1, the basic model, consisted of age, gender, blood pressure and mean PAP at rest, while Model 2 included the variables in model 1 plus the probability of PH calculated using the AI algorithm. The statistical analyses were performed using standard statistical software packages (SPSS software 21.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States and MedCalc Software 17; Mariakerke, Belgium). Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For continuous variables, the normality of distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Variables with normal distributions were presented as mean values ± standard deviation, otherwise as medians and the lower and upper quantile (Q1–Q3). The categorical data were presented as the percentage and number of patients. Statistical significance of differences between the groups was assessed using the Student’s t test for data with normal distribution. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for data that were not normally distributed. For categorical variables, the Fisher’s exact test was used. When equality of variance was found between each group using the Levene’s test, one-way general linear model analysis of variance, followed by Tukey–Kramer post hoc test analysis was used to assess the difference between parameters in patients with CVD risks versus without CVD risks. The Kruskal–Wallis followed by Conover post hoc test was used for data that were not equal of variance between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using standard statistical software packages (MedCalc Software 17; Mariakerke, Belgium). Statistical significance was defined by p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!