The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using helios cytof

1

Postmortem Analysis of COVID-19 Microglia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue from a deceased patient with COVID-19 pneumonia and invasive ventilation was obtained postmortem. Immunohistochemistry for Iba1 revealed many microglia nodules within the medulla of this patient. Tissues were manually dissociated and filtered using a 40μm cell strainer. Mononuclear cells were isolated using density gradient centrifugation. Viable cells were counted and stained for mass cytometry. Mass cytometry reagents were obtained or generated by custom conjugation to isotope-loaded polymers using the Maxpar X8 antibody labeling kit. Mass cytometry antibodies used are shown in Table S3. Staining was performed after β2-microglobulin-based sample barcoding. Briefly, single-cell suspensions were pelleted, incubated with 20 μM Lanthanum-139-loaded maleimido-mono-amine-DOTA in PBS for 10min at RT for live/dead discrimination (LD). Cells were washed in staining buffer and resuspended in surface antibody cocktail, incubated for 30min at RT, washed twice in staining buffer, fixed and permeabilized using FoxP3 staining buffer set, and stained intracellularly for 60min at RT. Cells were further washed twice before fixation in 1.6% PFA solution containing 125nM Iridium overnight at 4°C. Prior to data acquisition on CyTOF Helios (Fluidigm), cells were washed twice in PBS and once in cell acquisition solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CyTOF-based Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were processed as previously described.51 After thawing, cells were classified as unstimulated and stimulated. After an overnight rest, stimulated cells were incubated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)+ionomycin; during incubation, anti-CD107a, brefeldin A, and monensin were added to all samples. Dead cells were identified using Cell-ID Cisplatin-195Pt (Fluidigm) prior to surface staining and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, followed by intracellular and DNA staining with Cell-ID Intercalator-Ir (Fluidigm) (antibodies are provided in supplemental Tables 2 and 3, available on the Blood Web site). Prior to acquisition (CyTOF Helios; Fluidigm), cells were washed with Milli-Q water and resuspended in a 1× solution of EQ Four Element Calibration Beads (Fluidigm). Data were normalized using MATLAB normalizer before analyzing with Cytobank.52
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparameter Profiling of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved LPMC and PBMC were barcoded with a combination of anti-CD45 antibodies (89Y, 115In, and 175Lu) for 30 min at RT and washed with Maxpar Cell Staining Buffer (Fluidigm). After centrifugation, cells were stained with an antibody mix (SI Appendix, Tables S1 and S5) for 45 min at RT. After washes, cells were incubated with cisplatin (1:1,000, Cell-ID™ Cisplatin-198Pt; Fluidigm) for 5 min at RT, quenched with Maxpar Cell Staining Buffer, and fixed with 2% PFA for 30 min at 4 °C. For intracellular staining, eBioScience Fix/Perm Buffer (Invitrogen) was added to cells and centrifuged, stained with markers dissolved in Fix/Perm Buffer for 45 min at 4 °C, and washed with Fix/Perm Buffer. After centrifugation, the pellet was incubated with iridium (1:1,000, Cell-ID™ Intracalator-Ir; Fluidigm) overnight at 4 °C, washed, and acquired on CyTOF Helios (Fluidigm). EQ beads were used for normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CyTOF Acquisition of Cell Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to acquisition, cells were washed twice with Milli-Q water and resuspended in a 1:10 dilution of EQ Four Element Calibration Beads [Fluidigm] to a concentration of 0.5 × 106 cells/mL. Samples were acquired using a CyTOF Helios [Fluidigm] and data normalized to mass bead signal using the Nolan lab Matlab software [GitHub, https://github.com/nolanlab]. Each Barcode set was fully acquired within 1 day of mass cytometry run time, and all barcode sets were acquired on sequential days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Human Lymph Node Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human samples were obtained as approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from either subjects or their legal authorized representatives prior to sample collection. Draining LNs were obtained from lung transplant donors during lung resection and from cancer patients during tumor resection and/or biopsy. Patient information was summarized in Table S1. Patient ages ranged from 57 to 69 (4 males and 5 females). PBMCs were obtained from healthy donors. Healthy donor ages ranged from 28–57 (14 males and 3 females). The influence of association of sex, gender or both on the results of the study could not be performed due to insufficient statistical power. The human LNs were smashed with 5 ml syringe column (BD) and then filtered through 40μm cell strainer (VWR North American) to make a single cell suspension. LN cells were washed with RPMI 1640 and then frozen in −140 °C freezer (2–3 million cells per vial) until future use. The human LN samples were stained with conjugated antibodies (Key Reference Table) and ran on either a BD FACS Canto or a Helios CyTOF (Fluidigm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Profiling of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen and lung cells from mice, and human PBMCs were first stained with 200 µM cisplatin (Sigma) for the discrimination of dead cells. Upon this, cells were washed and stained with a primary antibodies cocktail for 30 minutes at 4 °C (Supplementary Table 1 (for human antibodies) and Supplementary Table 5 (for mouse antibodies)). Dilution of different antibodies used was either 1:100 or 1:200 and was standardized by our CyTOF platform. After washing, cells were stained with the heavy metal-labeled antibodies cocktail for 30 minutes at 4 °C. Cells were washed, fixed and permeabilised using fixation FoxP3 buffer (eBioscience) for 45 minutes at 4 °C. Upon this cells were stained with intranuclear antibodies cocktail for 30 minutes at 4 °C. Labeled cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 2% or 4% PFA overnight. Subsequently, cells were washed and stained for barcodes (30 minutes at 4 °C) and DNA (10 minutes at 4 °C). Samples were acquired on the Helios CyTOF (Fluidigm), and analyzed as mentioned before24 ,25 (link),71 (link). For details, see supplementary methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Cytometry Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the day of sample acquisition, the cells were diluted in 1 ml FACS buffer and washed. The cells were then washed twice in MilliQ water, and then re-suspended at 1 × 106/ml in 1:10 EQ calibration beads (Fluidigm). A minimum number of 500,000 events were then acquired on a mass cytometer (Helios CyTOF, Fluidigm) using CyTOF software (Fluidigm). Following acquisition, all flow cytometry standard (.fcs) files were normalised to bead signal levels using CyTOF software (see [41 (link)] for more details).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CyTOF Analysis of Immune Cell Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed twice with staining buffer and then with MilliQ (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA) water. After the final wash, the cells were adjusted to a concentration of 106 cells/mL with 1:10 EQ beads to MilliQ water solution. Prior to the acquisition with the Helios CyTOF (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA), the instrument, was tuned and calibrated using the EQ standard beads. The acquisition speed of the sample was maintained within 400 events/seconds to avoid doublets and ion cloud fusion errors in the data. The output FCS files were normalized using the Fluidigm normalizer algorithm that is embedded within the CyTOF software (Version 6.7.1014). The CyTOF data was first gated using the Cytobank software in order to exclude debris, dead cells and doublets (Kotecha et al., 2010 ). The resulting FCS file was then converted into a gene expression matrix using the Cytofkit R package using an inverse hyperbolic sine transformation (Chen et al., 2016 (link)). The gene expression matrix was then analyzed with a Seurat-based custom pipeline, which allowed for SNN clustering and UMAP visualization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mass Cytometry Time Series Standardization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To minimize the effect of experimental variability on mass cytometry measurements between serially collected samples, samples corresponding to the entire time series collected from one woman were processed, barcoded, pooled, stained, and ran simultaneously. To minimize the effect of variability between study participants, the run was completed within consecutive days, while carefully controlling for consistent tuning parameters of the mass cytometry instrument (Helios CyTOF, Fluidigm Inc., South San Francisco, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mass Cytometry Variability Minimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To minimize the effect of experimental variability on mass cytometry measurements between serially collected samples, samples corresponding to the entire time series collected from one participant were processed, barcoded, pooled, stained, and run simultaneously. To minimize the effect of variability between study participants, samples sets of patients matched for control and treatment (HSR dataset), or randomized for time of sampling (NTP and LSR datasets). Further, the run was completed within consecutive days, while carefully controlling for consistent tuning parameters of the mass cytometry instrument (Helios CyTOF, Fluidigm Inc., South San Francisco, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!