The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Digitizer tablet

Manufactured by OsteoMetrics
Sourced in United States

The Digitizer tablet is a lab equipment device that digitizes handwritten or drawn input into a computer-readable format. It captures the position and movement of a stylus or other pointing device on its surface and converts it into digital data that can be processed and stored electronically.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using digitizer tablet

1

Histology and Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The histology and histomorphometry measurements were performed as previously described 19 (link). In brief, the right femurs were fixed in 10% Millonig's formalin with 0.5% sucrose for 24 h and were gradually dehydrated into 100% ethanol. The femurs were embedded undecalcified in methyl methacrylate and stained for Goldner trichrome staining. The histomorphometric examination of trabecular bone, osteoblast number, and osteoid volume, was done on 5 μm longitudinal sections with a digitizer tablet (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Decatur, GA, USA) interfaced to a Zeiss Axioscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA) with a drawing tube attachment. The right tibia was fixed in 10% Millonig's formalin for 24 h and were decalcified in 14% EDTA for 7-10 days. The bones were embedded in paraffin before obtaining 5-μm longitudinal sections. After removal of paraffin and rehydration, sections were stained for TRAP activity and counter-stained with haematoxylin and osteoclasts were enumerated on the trabecular bone surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bone Formation and Resorption Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The left femurs were embedded undecalcified in methyl methacrylate. The dynamic histomorphometric examination of trabecular bone formation was done on 5 μm longitudinal sections with a digitizer tablet (OsteoMetrics, Inc, Decatur, GA, USA) interfaced to a Zeiss Axioscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA) with a drawing tube attachment. The right femurs fixed and decalcified in 14% EDTA for 7–10 days. The bones were embedded in paraffin before obtaining 5 μm longitudinal sections. After removal of paraffin and rehydration, sections were stained for TRAP activity and counter-stained with fast green, and osteoclasts were enumerated on the trabecular bone surface using Osteomeasure histomorphometric software (OsteoMetrics, Inc, Decatur, GA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bone Density and Microarchitecture Analysis in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in live mice by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry with a PIXImus Mouse Densitometer (GE Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) using the manufacturer’s software as described previously18 (link). Growth curves were obtained by sequential BMD measurement of the same animals from 8 weeks to 24 weeks of age. Micro-CT analysis of cortical and trabecular architecture was performed in femurs and fourth lumbar vertebrae (L4), as previously described19 (link). Biomechanical properties of femurs and L4 vertebrae were measured by 3-point bending and compression testing respectively, as previously described20 (link). L1–L3 lumbar vertebrae were fixed, embedded undecalcified in methylmethacrylate, and histomorphometric examination was done on longitudinal sections with a digitizer tablet (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Decatur, GA) interfaced to a Zeiss Axioscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) with a drawing tube attachment, as previously described21 (link). Terminology recommended by the Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research was used in this study22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Bone Architecture and Biomechanics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-CT analysis of cortical and trabecular architecture was performed in the femur and fourth lumbar vertebra, as previously described [17 ], followed respectively by 3-point bending and compression testing to measure biomechanical properties [18 (link)]. L1–L3 lumbar vertebrae were fixed in 10% Millonig’s formalin for 24 hours and embedded undecalcified in methylmethacrylate and static and dynamic histomorphometric examination of cancellous bone was done on 5 μm longitudinal sections with a digitizer tablet (OsteoMetrics, Inc., Decatur, GA) interfaced to a Zeiss Axioscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) with a drawing tube attachment, as previously described [4 (link)]. Femurs were fixed in 10% Millonig’s formalin for 24 hours, decalcified in 5% formic acid, washed for 6 hours and moved to 100% ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, and embedded in paraffin before obtaining 5 μm longitudinal sections. After removal of paraffin and rehydration, sections were stained for TRAP activity and counter-stained with methyl green and osteoclasts were enumerated on the endocortical surface. The terminology used in this study has been recommended by the Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!