The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using ptfe syringe filter

1

QuEChERS Extraction of Food Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample was homogenized using a grinder (T 25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX®, IKA, Staufen, Germany). After weighing 10 g of the sample, 10 mL of acetonitrile was added to each weighed sample and shaken for 1 min. Thereafter, a QuEChERS extraction kit (magnesium sulfate: 98.5–101.5%; sodium chloride: ≥99.5%; sodium citrate: 99.9%; disodium citrate sesquihydrate: 99%) was added to the sample solution, followed by vigorous shaking for 1 min using a rotary mixer (DE/VIVA, Collomix GmbH, Gaimersheim, Germany). Subsequently, centrifugation was performed for 10 min at 4000 rpm using SORVALL LYNX 4000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, 1 mL of the supernatant was put into the QuEChERS dispersive SPE kit (primary secondary amine, octadecyl silane end-capped, magnesium sulfate; 98.5–101.5%), mixed with Mixmate 5353 (Effendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 1 min, and centrifuged again with Minispin plus 545 (Effendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 10,000 rpm for 1 min. The liquid separated through this process was filtered with a 0.2 μm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) and was used as the final sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparative SEC Purification of PAHs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) of PAHs was conducted by injecting 5 mL of a PAH solution in CHCl3 (100 mg mL−1) to a Recycling Preparative HPLC (LC-9260 NEXT, Japan Analytical Industry) system equipped with JAIGEL-2.5 H/2 H/3 H columns and a differential refractometer. Chloroform was used as an eluent with a flow rate of 3.5 mL min−1. Before injection, the solution was filtered through a PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, 0.2 µm pore). The SEC was performed under a cycling mode until the coinciding peaks were separated. The desired fraction was collected using a fraction collector. Two prep-SEC systems ran in parallel, giving the maximum capacity of separation of 1 g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phytochemical extraction and fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried bark or leaves of collecting plants were crushed in a mixer separately. Two grams of each sample was extracted thrice with 75 mL of 100% methanol under sonication for 90 min, each. The extract was filtered with a filter paper (Whatman No. 2, USA). The final volume was adjusted to 75 mL with 100% methanol and filtered through a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, New York, NY, USA) before HPLC analysis. The filtrate was dried under a stream of N2 gas and then used in pancreatic lipase assay. The air-dried bark of FM (960 g) was ground and extracted in sonication with 100% methanol. The extract was filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude extract (187 g) was suspended in water and fractionated with n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and n-butanol, successively to yield n-hexane fr. (6.4%, w/w), CH2Cl2 fr. (3.2%), EtOAc fr. (32.1%), n-BuOH fr. (47.1%), and aqueous fr. (7.5%) fractions, respectively [26 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biocompatible PVA:CS Blended Solution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A biocompatible PVA:CS blended solution was prepared by mixing a PVA solution and a chitosan solution, respectively. A PVA solution was synthesized by dissolving a mixture of 10 wt% PVA powder and 3 mL diluted deionized (DI) water. In addition, a chitosan solution was synthesized by dissolving a mixture of 2 wt% chitosan powder based on the shrimp shell, 2% acetic acid solution, and 10 mL DI water. The PVA solution and chitosan solution were completely dissolved using a magnetic stirrer with 600 rpm at 90 °C for 2 h and 800 rpm at 50 °C for 6 h, respectively. The solutions were then filtered using a 5 μm pore size polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter (Whatman, International Ltd., Maidstone, UK) to remove impurities. Finally, the two solutions were completely mixed in a 1:1 ratio using a magnetic stirrer at 800 rpm at room temperature for 6 h. Figure 1a shows the fabrication details of the PVA:CS blended solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Lactic Acid Fermentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The enzymatic hydrolysis of KCW was conducted in a 100-mL total volume containing 1.5–6.0% (w/v) dry matter, cellulase (5.6 mg/g KCW), pectinase (4.2 mg/g KCW), 2.0% yeast extract, 0.5% sodium acetate, 0.2% dipotassium phosphate, 0.01% magnesium sulfate, and 0.005% manganese sulfate at E°C for 24 h. The fermentation of 40 mL hydrolysates (1.5–6.0%) with 0.4 mL LAB—W. cibaria WiKim28, L. sakei WiKim31, and L. curvatus WiKim38, respectively—was performed at 30°C for 6 days. Culture broths of LAB were centrifuged at 8000 rpm (5810R, fixed angle type; Eppendorf, USA), serially diluted, and filtered through a 0.45-μm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, USA). The content of organic acid was measured by HPLC (Waters Alliance e2695 system, USA) at 30°C using an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 mm × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Elution was carried out isocratically using 5 mmol/L sulfuric acid. The flow rate and detection wavelength were 0.6 mL/min and 210 nm, respectively. Quantitative analysis of organic acid was performed using standard curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Buccal Film Drug Content Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The drug content in the buccal film was determined as follows: three films, each measuring 1.5 cm2, were dissolved in their respective mobile phases and sonicated for 10 min to ensure complete dissolution. After that, the solutions were filtered by a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) for HPLC analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction of Sulfate Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sub-samples of QFF were combined in pre-baked and solvent-rinsed jars and were extracted into high-purity methanol (99.9%, Fisher Scientific) by 40 minutes of sonication (Branson 5510). Extracts were then filtered with a pre-rinsed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter (13 mm, 0.2 μm pore size, Whatman) and reduced in volume under high-purity nitrogen (5 psi) and gentle 50 °C heating. Once dry, samples were reconstituted in 2:1 water-methanol (v/v) to 200 μL. This extraction procedure gave average recoveries of 84% for benzyl sulfate, 76% for phenyl sulfate, and 92% for 3-methylphenyl sulfate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis of LEU-Oleic Acid Conjugate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LEU acetate (127 mg) was dissolved in 4 mL of deionized water (DW) and stirred at 700 rpm until completely dissolved. Then, 14 µL of triethylamine was dissolved in LEU acetate solution to desorb the acetate anions. C18 fatty acids (25 mM) were dissolved in 4 mL of THF and stirred at 700 rpm until completely dissolved. To deprotonate the carboxylic group of fatty acids for the reaction, triethylamine (14 µL) was added into fatty acids/THF solution and followed by the adding of benzoyl chloride (12 µL) and DMAP (1.22 mg). Herein, the deprotonated fatty acids reacted with benzoyl chloride to form the acid anhydride. Then, the obtained acid anhydride was attacked with DMAP, forming another leaving group (fatty acid-DMAP reactive) and then it was replaced by the hydroxyl group of LEU. Yamaguchi chloride (2,4,6-tribenzoyl chloride) used in the existing mechanism causes steric hindrance, therefore benzoyl chloride was used instead.25 (link)
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram for the hydroxyl group targeted LEU-oleic acid conjugate (LOC). After stirring for 1 h, the mixture was injected into the DW through a 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, England) and stirred at 700 rpm for 3 h. Finally, the solution was dialyzed against absolute ethanol to purify the unreacted substances.

Schematic diagram for the hydroxyl group targeted LEU-oleic acid conjugate (LOC).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antioxidant Capacity Determination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol, sodium carbonate, gallic acid, Folin-Ciocalteu′s phenol reagent, DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (2,2′ azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic-acid), potassium persulphate, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) were obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). HPLC-grade water was obtained by purifying double distilled water in a Milli-Q Gradient A10 system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC-MS Sample Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol (MeOH) and acetonitrile were HPLC grade and were both purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Ammonium carbonate used in the sample extraction was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC-grade formic acid was purchased from Fisher Chemical (Toronto, ON, Canada). Ammonium formate for LC/MS was obtained from Honeywell (Charlotte, NC, USA). Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) and sodium chloride (NaCl) were used to extract salt, and primary and secondary amine (PSA), C18 and MgSO4, which were used for clean-up, were purchased from Bekolut GmbH & Co (Hauptstuhl, Germany). Direct-Q®3 UV with pump devices from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA) was used to purify the demineralized water. A polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) syringe filter from Whatman (Maidstone, UK) was used for filtration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Ptfe syringe filter »