The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using bnt162b2

1

Heterologous and Homologous COVID-19 Vaccine Regimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The basic immunizations (first and second vaccination) were performed from January to June 2021 using the m-RNA vaccine BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer, Mainz, Germany; B) and the vector-based vaccine ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE; A).
Following the recommendations of the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), participants with first dose BNT162b2 received a second BNT162b2 dose either after three or six weeks. Participants with ChAdOx1-S received either ChAdOx1-S or BNT162b2 after 12 weeks at their own discretion. This resulted in three homologous (BB-3 weeks, BB-6 weeks, and AA-12 weeks) vaccine applications and one heterologous BNT162b2-ChAdOx1-S group (AB-12 weeks). BNT162b2 was used to boost all study participants. The time intervals between the second and booster vaccinations are depicted in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Efficacy Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vaccinated individuals in the cohort received a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Denmark (approved by the European Medicines Agency) and were followed up from the date of vaccination with the first dose (with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), or Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson and Johnson)). Only estimates for individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 are presented in the main analysis. Estimates for individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or Ad26.COV2.S are presented in the supplemental materials, because these vaccines were withdrawn from the national mass vaccination programme and rarely used. The main risk window of interest was the 28 days after vaccination, which included day 0, the day of vaccination. If study participants received a second dose, they re-entered a 28 day risk window.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was a prospective observational cohort study. Patients were included from the IBD center of the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), the Netherlands, between May 2021 and October 2021. Patients received a personal invitation by mail to supply a blood sample after they completed a standard vaccination regimen against SARS-CoV-2. IgG antibody titers against the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 were determined in serum. Inclusion criteria were an established diagnosis of CD or UC through the standard endoscopic, histological, and radiological criteria, an age of 18 years or older, and full vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Full vaccination was defined as a completion of a vaccination regimen in accordance with practice guidelines, which constitutes either a double vaccination of Pfizer–BioNTech BNT162b2, Moderna mRNA-1273 or AstraZeneca AZD1222 vaccine, a single vaccination of Janssen Ad26.CoV2.S vaccine, or a previous confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection followed by a single vaccination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mortality Reduction in Vaccinated COVID-19 Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample size for this study was determined based on the observation of mortality differences between various groups, akin to effective pharmacological interventions. The calculation was derived from previously reported mortality rates following the use or non-use of corticosteroids (41.3% and 24.8%, respectively) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring high-flow oxygen [18 (link)]. To achieve the required power of 0.8, 126 patients were needed in each group (vaccinated and unvaccinated). Following the study’s completion, a post hoc statistical power analysis was conducted, revealing that being vaccinated (with two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer—BioNTech) or ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) vaccines) reduces mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, resulting in a statistical power of 93.3% for the vaccinated group and 96% for the subgroup vaccinated with BNT162b2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dynamics of COVID-19 Antibody Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Health care professionals from Rigshospitalet and Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital (Capital Region of Denmark) volunteered to participate in this approximately 6-months prospective longitudinal observational study to determine the dynamics of the antibody levels after SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 vaccination. The sample collection strategy did not interfere with the Danish COVID-19 vaccination program. Participants received either two doses of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) or the combination of one dose of the ChAdOx1-nCoV19 from Oxford/AstraZeneca followed by one dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccines (ChAdOx1/BNT162b2). Samples were collected before or up to 14 days after the first dose and approximately 3 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months after the first dose. Age, sex, weight, and height were collected from online questionnaires completed by the participants. Venous blood samples collection fulfilled the principles described in the Declaration of Helsinki. The participants provided informed consent after oral and written information. The protocol was approved by the Regional Scientific Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-20079890).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Longitudinal Immune Responses Post-COVID Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study was approved by the North West-Preston Research Ethics Committee, United Kingdom (20/NW/0240) and all participants gave written informed consent and received no compensation. Blood was collected in June to September from 20 healthcare workers (HCW), ten males and ten females aged 28-64 years, at 3-6 months postinfection during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 WT (D614G) infection in the United Kingdom. Control samples were collected from SARS-CoV-2 UH individuals (n = 14; 6 males and 8 females aged 24-63 years) confirmed to be seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 (Extended Data Fig. 1), or collected before the pandemic from healthy donors as part of an ethically approved study (South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee 14/WM/1254). Subsequent samples were collected from those UH individuals who remained uninfected following vaccination with Pfizer BioNtech BNT162b2 or AstraZeneca ChAdOx-1 (n = 9; 3 males and 6 females aged 39-63 years) 1-5 months after vaccination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Response in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient in-and exclusion criteria have been previously described (7) (link). Briefly, pSS patients fulfilled 2016 ACR/ EULAR criteria, were SARS-CoV-2 naive, and were allowed to use only hydroxychloroquine or <10 mg/day prednisone. Participants were vaccinated according to the Dutch vaccination programme with Pfizer/BNT162b2, Moderna/mRNA-1273 or AstraZeneca/ AZD1222 vaccines. Mean time interval between vaccinations was 35±2 days for mRNA vaccines and 70±4 days for AZD1222, as approved by European health authorities. Blood samples were taken pre-vaccination (T1) and 7 days after second vaccination (T2). CoV-2 antibody titres were measured as described previously (7) (link). Ethical approval was obtained from the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG) institutional review board (METc 2014/491, METc 2021/084) and all participants provided written informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Immune Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The seronegative control samples provided by the Cell Bank (BCRJ) were included in the study through the approved Ethics Committee of the Federal University of ABC (CAAE: 43139921.2.0000.5594). These control serum samples were collected from venous blood before the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 10). The ChAdOx1-S (Oxford–AstraZeneca) (n = 29) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) (n = 29) venous blood were collected from vaccinated study participants who reported no previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 at least 28 days after the second immunization. Written informed consent was approved by the Ethics Committee in Research of the Clinics Hospital of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School (HC-FMUSP CAPPesq-CAAE: 30155220.3.0000.0068) and signed by all vaccinated study participants. Samples were categorized along with the article as pre-pandemic, AstraZeneca WT (serum from individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S and evaluated using the spike WT protein as antigen), Pfizer WT (serum from individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 and evaluated using the spike WT protein as antigen), AstraZeneca P.1 (serum from individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S and evaluated using the spike P.1 protein as antigen), and Pfizer P.1 (serum from individuals vaccinated with BNT162b2 and evaluated using the spike P.1 protein as antigen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Longitudinal Immune Response to COVID-19 Vaccines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were collected at two time points from COVID‐19 patients (before vaccination with at least 4 months after confirmed diagnosis and 4 weeks after vaccination with either BNT162b2 [Pfizer] or ChAdOx1‐S [AstraZeneca]); and at three‐time points from healthy volunteers (1 day before vaccination and 4 weeks following the first and second doses of ChAdOx1‐S or BNT162b2 vaccines).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Vaccine-Induced Immune Response Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A retrospective study aimed at assessing the immune response in healthy adult volunteers (n = 195) belonging to the staff of the University-Hospital of Ferrara vaccinated with two doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: Pfizer–BioNTech/BNT162b2 (mRNA-based vaccine) or adenovector, ChAdOx1/AstraZeneca (AdV-based vaccine), in the period starting from January 2021, according to the directives of the Italian Health Ministry. A 6-month period from the second vaccine dose (15–190 days) was considered adequate to monitor the entire circulating antibody kinetic as recently reported by Salvagno et al. in healthcare workers (Salvagno et al., 2022b (link)). The study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the local regional ethical committee (CE-AVEC; 405/2020/Oss/UniFe); the participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The study consisted of a first immunological assessment aimed at evaluating the anti-SARS-CoV-2 circulating antibodies (IgG and neutralizing antibodies, NAbs) and a genotyping profile investigation including a group of selected common gene variants to identify candidate genetic modifiers of the vaccine-induced immune response.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!