The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gateway system

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, Japan, France, United Kingdom, Sweden

The Gateway system is a versatile laboratory tool designed for a wide range of applications. It provides a reliable and consistent platform for various scientific experiments and processes. The core function of the Gateway system is to facilitate the transfer and integration of DNA sequences between different vectors, allowing for efficient manipulation and study of genetic material. The system offers a streamlined and standardized approach to DNA cloning and related tasks, enabling researchers to optimize their workflows and achieve consistent results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

383 protocols using gateway system

1

Generating Transgenic Drosophila Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequence of constructs made for this paper can be found in Table S1 DNA sequences of constructs used. Related to STAR Methods.
The UAS-darc1-3′UTR-GFP constructs were cloned into pAWG vector using the Gateway system (ThermoFisher). The GFP with resulting 3′UTR fragments were amplified out of this construct, and cloned into pENTR/DTOPO. The resulting construct was finally cloned into the pTWM construct, containing an attB site for targeted genomic insertion. The darc1 sequences are in Table S1.
The UAS-dArc1-RNAi2 construct was cloned by first amplifying a dArc1 fragment, that was non-overlapping with the VDRC 31122 line, using RNAi2 forward and reverse primers.
The PCR product was cloned into PENTR-DTOPO (ThermoFisher), and then, using the Gateway system (ThermoFisher), it was cloned into pWalium10. All constructs were then injected into flies and integrated at site attP2 on the third chromosome, through targeted integration by BestGene.
The UAS-dArc1 rescue transgene was synthesized (Genscript) and using the Gateway system (ThermoFisher), cloned into the pTWM vector. The sequence of the darc1 rescue construct is included in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Maize Ubiquitin Promoter Gateway Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Maize Ubiquitin promoter from pTCK303 [67 ] was cloned into pMDC32 Gateway vector substituting 2×35S promoter to generate pMDC32-pUBI destination vector by Hind Ⅲ and Kpn Ⅰ, and STF, GFP and GUS were cloned into pMDC32-pUBI destination vector by using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). To generate the UBI::GFP-STF vector, GFP and STF were cloned separately, with 18 bp overlapping sequence between 3’GFP and 5’STF to acquire the GFP-STF sequence cloned into pMDC32-pUBI destination vector by using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). Constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens by electroporation or the freezing transformation method. A. tumefaciences strain AGL1 was used for Brachypodium, switchgrass and rice transformation as previously described [9 (link), 68 (link), 69 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Yeast Two-Hybrid and BiFC Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Y2H assay was performed using the Matchmaker Gold System (Clontech). The coding sequence of SLB1 was cloned into the pGBKT7 vector, and the coding sequences of MtASK1, MtASK2, and BS1 were cloned into the pGADT7 vector using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). The bait and prey plasmids were cotransformed into yeast strain Y2H Gold (Clontech). For the auxotrophic assay, yeast colonies were inoculated onto SD/−Leu/−Trp (DDO) and SD/−Trp/−Leu/−His/−Ade (QDO) plates and incubated in the dark at 28°C for 3 d. All primers used are listed in Table S1.
The BiFC assay was conducted as described (Meng et al., 2019). Briefly, SLB1 was cloned into pEarlygate201‐YN, while MtASK1, MtASK2 and BS1 were cloned to pEarlygate202‐YC using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). SLB1‐nYFP, MtASK1‐cYFP, MtASK2‐cYFP and BS1‐cYFP were introduced into A. tumefaciens strain GV2260. Various combinations of transformed A. tumefaciens cells were simultaneously infiltrated into 4‐wk‐old N. benthamiana leaves. P19 from tomato bushy stunt virus was used to inhibit transgene silencing. Fluorescence signals were observed 48–60 h after infiltration under a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nestin Knockdown and Overexpression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For knockdown of Nestin expression, retrovirus vectors (pSM2) encoding shRNAs were purchased from Open Biosystems (Huntsville, AL, United States) (Yang et al., 2017 (link)). In addition, we used lentivirus provided by Andy Peng Xiang to upregulate Nestin. Myc-tagged Nestin was constructed using Invitrogen’s Gateway System. For overexpression of HIF1-α, plasmid was constructed using Invitrogen’s Gateway System. MG132 and CHX were purchased from Sigma. Non-target control (NTC) was used as the control group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Generating Sbm-Gal4 and UAS-Sbm Transgenic Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate the Sbm-Gal4 transgenic line we analyzed the genome region of the sbm gene with Evoprinter (https://evoprinter.ninds.nih.gov/), comparing to the D. sechellia, D. yakuba, D. erecta and D. Pseudoobscura sequences and found that there were sections of the introns of the gene with a degree of conservation that suggested that they could contain regulatory sequences. We cloned into the TOPO vector (Invitrogen) an approximately 3.4 kb long fragment of the locus including the introns of the RC and RD transcripts, from the template BACR22I24 (Genebank ID AC022346, obtained from the BAC PAC Resources at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute) with the primers listed in Table S1. Using the Gateway system (Invitrogen) we subcloned this fragment into the pBPGAL4.2Uw-2 (a gift from Gerald Rubin, Addgene plasmid #26227, (Pfeiffer et al., 2010 (link)) and sent to Genetic Services, Inc. (MA, USA) for injection into their y, w; attP2 line (location 68A4, chromosome 3L.)
To generate the UAS-Sbm transgenic line, we used the Gateway system (Invitrogen) to subclone the CDS from the TOPO vector to the pUASg:attB vector (Bischof et al., 2013 (link)) and sent to Genetic Services, Inc. (MA, USA) for injection into their y, w; attP2 line (location 68A4, chromosome 3L.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Recombinant Expression and Purification of EphA2 Antigens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human EphA2 cDNA was purchased from Open Biosystems (Huntsville, AL, USA). Gene fragments corresponding to nucleotides 1–981 and 1–1578 of the coding region (antigens #1 and 5) were amplified using the polymerase chain reaction, fused to a FLAG-tag-coding sequence at the 3′ end, and subcloned into the pcDNA3.2-DEST mammalian-expression vector using the Gateway System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA; Figure 1). Expression vectors for the EphA2 ligand-binding and cysteine-rich domains (antigen #1) and EphA2 extracellular domain (antigen #5) were transiently transfected under serum-free conditions into FreeStyle 293-F and A431 cells, respectively. These recombinant antigens were secreted into serum-free conditioned medium, collected, and purified by anti-FLAG mAb-conjugated agarose-affinity chromatography as described previously.25 (link) Purity of the recombinant proteins was verified by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.
For antibody epitope mapping, antigens #2, 3, and 4, corresponding to EphA2 aa 28–125, 101–250, and 226–328, respectively, with C-terminal FLAG tags, were amplified using the polymerase chain reaction and subcloned into the pET160 vector using the Gateway System (Invitrogen; Figure 1). Recombinant antigens were expressed in E. coli and purified with anti-FLAG mAb-conjugated agarose chromatography as described previously.21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Adenovirus Production and Gene Silencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adenoviruses were prepared using the ViraPower Adenoviral Expression System (Invitrogen), as previously described1,19, 20,21. PCR-amplified, C-terminal 6xHis and 3xFLAG tagged full-length Ildr2 was subcloned into the pENTR/D-TOPO vector using the pENTR Directional TOPO Cloning Kit (Invitrogen). Inserts of pENTR-Ildr2-6xHis-3xFLAG vector were transferred into the pAd/CMV/V5-DEST vector by the Gateway system (Invitrogen).
For the shRNAs of Ildr2 and LacZ were cloned into BLOCK-iT U6 entry vector (Invitrogen). The sequence of the shRNA for Ildr2 shRNA1 was: 5′- cacc GAAGAAGGTGGCCATGCTC acgtgtgctgtccgt GAGCATGGCCACCTTCTTC -3′ and Ildr2 shRNA2 was: cacc GCTGATTTCAAATCTTAGT gcgcttcctgtcacgc ACTAAGATTTGAAATCAGC. The inserts of pENTR shRNAs vectors were transferred into the adenovirus vector pAd/PL-DEST using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). The recombinant adenoviruses were purified by the Adenovirus Purification Miniprep Kit (Cell Biolabs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Localization and Overexpression of OsEL2 and Related Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To observe protein localization of OsEL2, the sequence of the OsEL2 promoter and full‐length cDNA was amplified by PCR and the amplified fragment was introduced into the pGWB4 expression vector (Nakagawa et al., 2007a,b) using the Gateway system (Invitrogen, http://www.invitrogen.com/). To generate the OsEL2, OsEL2like and OsNCED1 overexpression plants, the full‐length cDNAs of these genes were amplified and introduced into the pGWB2 expression vector (Nakagawa et al., 2007a,b) using the Gateway system (Invitrogen, http://www.invitrogen.com/). The primers for vector construction are listed in Table S7. For the generation of loss‐of‐function mutants, CRISPR‐CAS9 system was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Yeast Two-Hybrid Analysis of IbNAC3 Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full-length coding sequence of IbNAC3 was inserted into the prey vector pGADT7 (Clontech) and the fulllength coding sequence of ANAC011, ANAC072, ANAC083, ANAC100, and NAP was separately cloned into the bait vector pGBKT7 (Clontech) by Gateway system (Invitrogen). Then the negative control, positive control, and indicated co-transformed recombinant constructs were introduced into the Y2HGold yeast cells according to the manufacturer's instructions (Clontech). A series of dilutions were transferred onto DDO (SD/-Trp-Leu), QDO (SD/-Trp-Leu-His-Ade), QDO/Aba (QDO with 200 ng/mL Aba), QDO/3-AT (QDO with 2 mM 3-AT), and QDO/Aba/ABA (QDO/Aba with 20 μM ABA) medium and were incubated at 30°C for 3-5 days to detect their survival.
For additional Y2H assays to map the protein domain of IbNAC3 that are required for each specific interaction with ANAC011, ANAC072, ANAC083, ANAC100, and NAP, all the truncated IbNAC3 sequences were amplified by PCR by the indicated primers and inserted into the pGBKT7 vector by Gateway system (Invitrogen). Different combinations of the recombinant pGADT7 and pGBKT7 plasmids were co-transformed into the yeast strain Y2HGold and the interactions were detected as above. Each interaction had at least three biological replicates with similar results, related primers were listed in Supplemental Table S6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Generating FLM Mutant Constructs in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A previously described construct with the Col-0 genomic FLM fragment pFLM::gFLM template (pDP34) (Posé et al., 2013 (link)) was recombined into a pDONR201 destination vector using the Gateway system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). This vector was used as a template (FLMCol-0) to generate mutations using either a single phosphorylated primer or a combination of forward and reverse primers (Sawano and Miyawaki, 2000 (link); Hansson et al., 2008 (link)). In case of variants with multiple modifications, individual mutations were introduced one at a time. The mutated inserts were recombined to the pFAST-R07 expression vector using the Gateway system (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) (Shimada et al., 2010 (link)). All expression constructs were verified by sequencing and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Nd-1 plants were transformed using the floral-dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998 (link)) and transgenic plants were identified based on seed fluorescence (Shimada et al., 2010 (link)). Segregation of T2 lines was examined and lines with single insertion events were selected for further analysis based on segregation ratios (Shimada et al., 2010 (link)). A list of primers and expression constructs is listed in Supplementary file 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!