The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

339 protocols using histamine

1

Electrochemical Monitoring of Histamine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Figure 1C shows photographs
of the detection process. After preparing the HUVEC monolayers on
the membranes, a piece of the membrane was immersed in ECGM2 containing
5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4– on the device. The membrane
was pushed onto the device surface using a polydimethylsiloxane frame
(Dow Corning Toray, Japan). Then, Ag/AgCl (sat. KCl) reference and
Pt counter electrodes were inserted into the solution. A voltage of
0.5 V was applied to the 400 working electrodes and the current from
each electrode was obtained every 200 ms. The current values were
converted into colors to construct electrochemical images consisting
of 20 × 20 pixels.
For the assays using histamine, 45 μL
of 0.333 mM histamine (Merck, Germany) was added into ECGM2 containing
5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4– (final histamine concentration:
10 μM). The change in the current values was monitored in real
time..
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Vascular Permeability in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both flanks of adult anaesthetized mice were shaven. The next day, 100 µl of 1% Evans Blue (Sigma-Aldrich) in sterile saline (wt/vol) was injected intravenously through the lateral tail vein. In some experiments, mice received an intraperitoneal injection of pyrilamine maleate (4 mg/kg body weight in 0.9% saline; Sigma-Aldrich) before Evans Blue injection to inhibit release of endogenous histamine. 30 min after Evans Blue injection, 20 µl of PBS or PBS containing 50 ng VEGF164 (PeproTech), 300 ng SEMA3A (R&D Systems), or 50 ng histamine (Sigma-Aldrich) were injected intradermally each at three sites into the flank skin of anaesthetized mice. After 20 min, mice were culled, the skin was separated from the underlying muscle, and the tissue surrounding the injection sites excised (circled in Fig. 1 A) and dried overnight at 55°C. Evans Blue was extracted by incubation in formamide at 55°C overnight and quantified by spectrophotometry at 620 nm after subtraction of background absorbance at 740 nm. Data from the three sites injected with the same agent (ligand or PBS) were averaged and expressed as fold change relative to PBS control per each mouse. In some experiments, the inner side of the skin was imaged on an MZ16 stereomicroscope (Leica) equipped with a Micropublisher camera (Perkin-Elmer). In other experiments, a sample of liver or skin tissue was retained for immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histamine and Thrombin Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histamine and thrombin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany). Histamine was used at 10 µM for the indicated times and thrombin was used at 10 U for 5 min. BAPTA-AM (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was preincubated for two hours at 5 µM. Diphenhydramine was used to inhibit activation of Histamine receptor type I, and ranitidine was used for inhibition of Histamine receptor type II. Both were preincubated at 1 µM and 10 µM, respectively, for 15 min. The ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was preincubated for 30 min at 10 µM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pharmacological Characterization of Test Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The test compounds are highly hygroscopic and were stored in a dry place. The solutions were prepared fresh every day. The products used in this study were obtained from the following sources, and stock solutions were prepared as indicated below: acetylcholine (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), carbachol (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), histamine (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), IbTX (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), glycopyrronium bromide (NVA237, Novartis), forskolin (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), papaverine (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy), indacaterol fumarate (QAB149, Novartis), quinine (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy) and TeTX (Sigma-Aldrich, Italy).
acetylcholine, carbachol, histamine and papaverine were dissolved in distilled water; glycopyrronium, indacaterol and forskolin were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO); indomethacin was dissolved in ethanol and then diluted in KH buffer solution. The maximal amount of ethanol (0.02 %) did not influence isolated tissue response [7 (link), 13 (link)–15 (link), 17 (link), 19 (link), 33 (link)]. Compounds were stored in small aliquots at −80 °C until their use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating Histamine-Induced Itch in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histamine (100 μg/50 μl, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was injected into wild-type (WT) mice and TRPV1 KO mice. One day before the experiment, nape hair was shaved to create an area with a diameter of 1.5 cm for intradermal injection. An experimental animal was placed in a small plastic cylinder (20 cm in diameter, 25 cm in height), and pads were placed in the cylinder to absorb excrement. Test animals were placed in a cylinder for 15 min to allow them to acclimate, and then Histamine was injected intradermally into the nape of the neck of the experimental animal. To measure the number of direct scratching events mediated by the rear hind legs, experimental animals were monitored 15 min before intradermal injection and 30 min after intradermal injection. The definition of direct scratching was the animal lifting its hind paw to the shaven navel and scratching the affected area and then returning the paw to its original position. To assess which receptors in particular were affected by curcumin, Histamine, compound 48/80 (100 μg/50 μl, Sigma-Aldrich), or chloroquine (100 μg/50 μl, Sigma-Aldrich) were injected in the same manner as described above in WT mice and TRPV1 KO mice and behavioral responses were observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytokine-Mediated Cutaneous Sensory Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were stimulated with 500 nM IL-4, IL-13, IL-33 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis MN) or the combination of IL-4 and IL-13 for 2 h. A cocktail of inflammatory mediators—1 μM histamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO), 1 μM serotonin (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO), 100 nM bradykinin (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO), and 1 μM prostaglandin E2 (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK)—previously used to demonstrate peripheral sensitization in this system (Castro et al., 2019 (link)) was used as a Control Inflammatory Stimuli (CIS). Following cytokine exposure, cells were washed and then challenged with pruritogens BAM8-22 (2 μM; Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) or histamine (10 μM) or TRP agonists Allyl isothiocyanate (AITC; 25 μM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or capsaicin (100 nM; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 30 s. Cells were then washed a second time and stimulated with TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (200 nM) as an assay control by direct application for 20 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparation and Storage of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histamine (CAS 51-45-6), LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (EC 297-473-0), FXF (CAS 153439-40-8), OST (CAS 484-12-8) and CP (CAS 25122-46-7) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. Y0001779, L4391, Y0000789, Y0001207 and Y0000559, respectively). Histamine (1 mg/mL) and LPS (0.8 mg/mL) were dissolved in water, FXF (5 mg/mL), and CP (25 mg/mL) in DMSO (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. no. D8418), while OST (10 mg/mL) was dissolved in 96% ethanol (Chempur, Piekary Śląskie, Poland, cat. no. 653964200). The solutions were filtered through 0.22 µm pore filters, aliquoted and stored at −20°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Lymphatic Permeability in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ear lymphatic permeability was assessed as previously described21 (link). 7–10 days after the last dose of Tamoxifen, mice were anesthetized with Avertin. We intradermally injected the ears of anesthetized Rap1afl/fl, Rap1bfl/fl; Prox1CreERT2 mice or Rap1afl/fl; Rap1bfl/fl mice with 3 μl of either histamine (10 mM, Sigma-Aldrich) or a combination of histamine (10 mM) and AM (10 μM) in saline with a 10 ul Hamilton syringe fitted with a 30 gauge needle. Three minutes later, the ears were subjected to intradermal injection of 3 μl 0.5% Evans Blue dye (Sigma-Aldrich) in saline. Images of the ears were obtained at 0 min and 10 min after dye injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Histamine Degradation by rhDAO Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Degradation of 100 ng/mL histamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, 53300) by 6 nM (1 µg/mL) rhDAO variants was measured in duplicate in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 1% human serum albumin (HSA; Albunorm; Octapharma, Vienna, Austria) or in EDTA plasma from a healthy volunteer, with or without 600 nM HMWH added (heparin, 1000 IU/mL equivalent to 2 mg/mL, Gilvasan, Vienna, Austria), using a Cisbio HTRF histamine 500 test kit (Biomedica, Vienna, Austria).
Plasma of seven mastocytosis patients and three healthy volunteers was spiked with 6 nM rhDAO-WT, 545 nM histamine, and 20 µM of the potent DAO-inhibitor diminazene aceturate (DIMAZ; Sigma-Aldrich, D7770) and histamine concentrations were determined in duplicate with a histamine ELISA (Immunotech IM2562, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) as described previously (Boehm et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Monitoring Gastric Acid Secretion in hGOs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acid secretion assays were performed as previously described (Schumacher et al., 2015). hGOs were grown in the chambered coverglass (Thermo Scientific) and the chamber was placed on an inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710), and experiments were performed under 5% CO2 and 37°C conditions (incubation chamber, PeCon, Erbach, Germany).
Freshly isolated mouse gastric fundic glands or cultured hGO were incubated with acridine orange (10 μM), then acridine orange fluorescence was excited at 458 nm or 488 nm and images were collected at 600–650 nm (Red) or 500–550 nm (Green), respectively. On the other hand, to monitor hGOs luminal pH, the ratiometric pH sensitive dye, 5-(and-6)-carboxy SNARF-5F (5mM stock: EX 560 nm, EM 565–605 (Green) and 620–680 (Red) nm: Invitrogen) was microinjected (46–92 nl) into the lumen and monitored. Fluorescent dye also added into medium. Histamine (100 μM; Sigma) was added to media, while famotidine (100 μM; Sigma) or omeprazole (100 μM; Sigma) were pre-incubated at least 30 min before Histamine. Images were analyzed using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA). Background corrected 620-680/565-605 nm ratio values were converted to pH using a standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!