The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

38 protocols using transcriptor first strand synthesis kit

1

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using Qiazol (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and quantity and quality were assessed spectrophotometrically. 0.5 to 1 μg total RNA was reverse transcribed using Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis Kits (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). qPCR was performed on Light Cycler 480 II (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) with Taqman probes (Life Technologies, Carlsbard, CA). Cyclophilin A (PPIA) was used as a reference gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using Qiazol (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and quantity and quality were assessed spectrophotometrically. 0.5 to 1 μg total RNA was reverse transcribed using Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis Kits (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). qPCR was performed on Light Cycler 480 II (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) with Taqman probes (Life Technologies, Carlsbard, CA). Cyclophilin A (PPIA) was used as a reference gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Adult Head RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation and qRT-PCR analysis was done as described (46 (link)). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from adult heads with TRI reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcribed with Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis kit (Roche). qRT-PCR was done using SYBR Green Detection on a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System. The geometric means of RpS13 and Rp49 were used for normalization. Relative expression levels were calculated with the ΔΔCt method (48 (link)). qRT-PCR primer sequences are:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of SMARCA2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded samples using RecoverAll™ Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit for FFPE (Invitrogen). Contamination with genomic DNA was removed using DNAse I treatment according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Aboult 300 ng of total RNA was used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis using Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis kit (ROCHE) and oligo-dT primer and random hexamer mix. Transcript levels of studied genes were measured in triplicates using Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast device with specific primers and SybrGreen. For SMARCA2, following primers were used hBRMq2F: TCCGAGGCAAAATCAGTCAAG and hBRMq2R: TTCCTCGATTTGGCCTTTTCT. As the reference primers UBI1: ATTTGGGTCGCGGTTCTTG and UBI2: TGCCTTGACATTCTCGATGGT specific for UBI (UBIQUITIN) gene were used. For the relative expression level calculation, the 2−ΔΔCt method was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using RNA Mini Kit (Bio&SELL, Germany), and total mRNA was reversely transcribed using Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis Kit (Roche, Germany). Primer specificity was confirmed by separating PCR amplification products in an agarose gel. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the Fast Sybr Kit (Kapa Biosystems, MA, U.S.A.) and a LightCycler 480 (Roche, Germany). Gene specific primers for BAX, BBC3, GADD45, and CDKN1A were used [44 (link)–47 (link)] at a concentration of 200 nM (Suppl. Table 1). The samples were preincubated at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 amplification cycles of 10 s denaturing at 95°C, 30 s annealing at 55°C, and amplification for 1 s at 72°C. Finally, a melting curve was performed with five acquisitions/°C from 65°C to 97°C. All samples were performed in triplicates. To calculate relative gene expression, the data of the threshold cycles was analyzed using the ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isoform-Specific CEACAM1 Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA extraction and quality analyses were performed as mentioned before [21 (link)]. 1 μg RNA was reverse transcribed using the Transcriptor First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Roche). The PCR were performed by ALLin™ Hot Start Taq Polymerase Kit (highQu, Kraichtal, Germany) in a total volume of 25 μl containing 1 μl of first-strand cDNA solution, 0.5 μl of ALLin Hot Start Taq Polymerase (5 u/μl), 5 μl of 5X-ALLin PCR Buffer, 2 μl each of the PCR primers (10 pmol/μl), and 14.5 μl H2O. The reactions were initiated by heating the samples to 95°C for 60 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 55–65°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 15 s and an extension at 4°C for 10 min. The products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels in Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The sense (forward (FP)) primer is common for the two isoforms, whereas the antisense (backward (BP)) primers are selective for the L or the S isoform, respectively. Following oligonucleotide, primers were used in order to amplify the different isoforms as previously described [22 (link)]: humanCEACAM1_FP49: 5′-GCAACAGGACCACAGTCAAGACGA-3′, humanCEACAM1_BP60: 5′-GTGGTTGGAGACTGAGGGTTTG-3′ and humanCEACAM1_BP59: 5′-TGGAGTGGTCCTGAGCTGCCG-3′. For quantification of CEACAM1-4L/4S ratio, a triple-primer PCR procedure was used as previously described [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Reverse Transcription and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse transcription reactions were performed with the Transcriptor First-Strand Synthesis kit (Roche AG; Mannheim, Germany) using 1 μg of total RNA, 60 μM random hexamers, and 2.5 μM oligo-dT primers and expression of the indicated genes was analyzed by qPCR using a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Forest City, CA) using SYBR green PCR master mix (Roche AG; Mannheim, Germany). Each reaction mixture contained 1× SYBR green master mix, cDNA from 1 μg of RNA, and 0.3 μM each oligonucleotide primer in a total volume of 20 μl. Primers for E6*I (E6/E7) were as follows: 5’-CAAGACAGTATTGGAACTTACAGAGGTG-’3 (sense) and 5’-CTGGCCTCTATAGTGCCCAGC-’3 (antisense). All values were normalized the levels of TATA-binding protein (TBP) using the following primers: 5’-TAAACTTGACCTAAAGACCATTGCA-’3 (sense) and 5’-CAGCAAACCGCTTGGGATTA-’3 (antisense).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Validating DGRP Candidate Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the validation of candidates from the DGRP, offspring was collected after eclosion and maintained at controlled densities of 20 total flies, aged to 3-5 days and snap frozen on dry ice. 10 to 15 fly heads were used per replicate for RNA extraction. For subsequent qPCR experiments concerning the RDGN transcription factors, flies were aged until 12-15 days old and only female flies were used for qPCR experiments.
Total RNA was isolated using TRI™ reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcription was performed on 1µg RNA using Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis kit (Roche). Primer sequences used are listed in Table S1. qPCR was performed on a Step-One-Plus using the SYBR Green detection system. Transcript levels were normalized to Rp49 transcript levels (initial screen) or using the geometric means of RpS13 & Rp49 (transcription factor experiments). Mean ΔCt values were statistically compared as described below. Relative quantitation of transcript levels to control genotypes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method and plotted with GraphPad Prism software to visualize expression differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis of Drosophila Heads and Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the validation of candidates from the DGRP, offspring was collected after eclosion and maintained at controlled densities of 20 total flies, aged to 3–5 days and snap frozen on dry ice. 10 to 15 fly heads were used per replicate for RNA extraction. For subsequent qPCR experiments concerning the RDGN transcription factors, flies were aged until 12–15 days old and only female flies were used for qPCR experiments. For larval qPCR, staged larvae (see below) were collected and all organs except the brain were dissected out. Each replicate is 5–6 larvae.
Total RNA was isolated using TRI reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse transcription was performed on 1μg RNA using Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis kit (Roche). Primer sequences used are listed in Table 2. qPCR was performed on a Step-One-Plus using the SYBR Green detection system. Transcript levels were normalized to Rp49 transcript levels (initial screen) or using the geometric means of ​RpS13 & Rp49 (transcription factor experiments). Mean ΔCt values were statistically compared as described below. Relative quantitation of transcript levels to control genotypes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method and plotted with GraphPad Prism software to visualize expression differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of SRGAP2 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from cell lines using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche, Basel). 1 μg of extracted RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Transcriptor First Strand Synthesis kit (Roche). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed in triplicate using SYBR green mix (Qiagen, Hilden) on an ABI 7500 machine (Applied Bio Systems, Foster City). Data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel and graphed using the Prism software package. The following primer sequences were used: SRGAP2 (for: aggaggaagcatggaggatt, rev: ttcatcatcgcttgtgtggt), Gapdh (for: gtgttcctacccccaatgtgt, rev: gagacaacctggtcctcagtgt). Data was graphed and analyzed using the Prism software package. Two-tailed, unpaired t-tests were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!