The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using r6357

1

Two-Photon Microscopy for Viral Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral expression was assessed by measuring fluorescence beginning 3 weeks after injection using a custom-made two-photon microscope equipped with resonant mirrors to allow for video rate sampling (Scholl et al., 2017 (link)). Fluorescence was detected using standard PMTs (R6357, Hamamatsu, Japan) and then amplified with a high-speed current amplifier (Femto DHPCA-100, Germany). Images were acquired at 400 μm × 400 μm fields of view using a 16× objective (Nikon N16XLWD-PF, Japan). Imaging data were motion corrected using cross correlation (Guizar-Sicairos et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histone and DNA Methylation Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was carried out as was previously described [36 (link)]. Briefly, the following rabbit monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against modified histones and DNA were used: anti-dimethyl histone H3 at lysine 4 (1:100; Abcam, cat. no. (ab7766), anti-dimethyl histone H3 at lysine 9 (1:100; Millipore, cat. no. 07–441) and anti-5-methyl-cytosine (1:300, Abcam, cat. no. ab73938). Two secondary antibodies were also applied–Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, cat. no. A-11008) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, cat. no. A-11001). The fluorescence of DAPI (excitation 405 nm, emission 425–475 nm) and Alexa488 (excitation 488 nm, emission 500–600 nm) was registered using an Olympus FV1000 confocal system (Olympus) equipped with an IX81 inverted microscope, a 60x Plan Apo oil-immersion objective lens (NA 1.35), a 50 mW, 405 nm diode laser and a 100 mW multi-line argon ion laser (Melles Griot BV). An axial series of 2-D fluorescence images of optical sections through the chromosomes (z-stacks) was collected using two separate photomultipliers (R6357, Hamamatsu). Image processing operations were performed with ImageJ (Fiji).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Two-photon calcium imaging protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calcium imaging was performed using a commercial two-photon laser-scanning microscope (LSM 510 META, Zeiss), equipped with a Ti:sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent), a 40 × water immersion objective (Achroplan 40×/0.8 W IR, Zeiss) and multialkali photomultiplier tubes (R6357, Hamamatsu). Cells labeled with YC2.60 were excited at 850 nm or 870 nm, and emitted light from cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) was detected after passing through a 510 nm dichroic beam splitter and, subsequently, through a blue bandpass filter (CFP, BP 435–485, Zeiss) and a green long-pass filter (YFP, LP 515, Zeiss). Images were acquired at a frame rate of ~4 Hz, with a resolution of 128 × 128 pixels with the software provided by the microscope manufacturer. To revisit the same cells, we used blood vessel patterns and stereotactic coordinates. Furthermore, custom-built titanium headplates and the corresponding fixation devices ensured reproducible fixation of the animals under the microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Vivo Two-Photon Laser Scanning Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vivo 2P-LSM was performed using a custom-built microscope equipped with a resonant scanner (RESSCAN-MOM, Sutter instrument) and a 20× water-immersion objective (W Plan-Apochromat 20x/1.0 DIC D=0.17 M27; Zeiss). Images were acquired with a frame rate of 30 Hz and a frame-averaging factor of 10, resulting in an effective acquisition rate of 3 Hz. Recorded fields of view (FOVs) had a size of 256 × 256 μm, sampled with 512 × 512 pixels (0.5 μm/pixel). To minimize photo-damage, incident laser power was kept between 30 and 40 mW for a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. Laser wavelength was set to 890 nm (Chameleon Ultra II, Ti:Sapphire Laser, Coherent). The emitted light was detected by photomultiplier tubes (R6357, Hamamatsu) [10 ] and pre-amplified (DHPCA-100, Femto). Digitizer (NI-5734) and control hardware (NI-6341) were housed in a NI PXIe (1082) chassis, connected to a control PC via a high bandwidth PXIe-PCIe8398 interface. Scanning and image acquisition were controlled by ScanImage (SI 5.6R1) [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Two-Photon Imaging of Neural Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were prepared for two-photon imaging in the same manner as described for the awake head fixed epifluorescence imaging experiments, except that animal were habituated to run on a free floating Styrofoam ball. Imaging was carried out with a two-photon microscope (MOM; Sutter Instruments) coupled to a pulsed Ti:Sapphire laser (Mai Tai HP; Spectra-Physics) and controlled by Scanimage 3.9 (Pologruto et al., 2003 (link)). In all experiments, imaging was performed through a 16 × 0.8 numerical aperture objective (Nikon) and emitted light was collected by multialkali photomultiplier tubes (Hamamatsu R6357). Images were acquired at 3.7 Hz in most experiments. Fluorescence time series were extracted and analyzed with custom Matlab scripts, and ΔF/F was calculated as in in vitro experiments. Pseudocolor activation maps reflect an average of 8 trials in which movies were spatially filtered using a Gaussian window with a sigma of 0.75 pixels and temporally filtered using a fourth-order Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.25 Hz. Correlation coefficients of odor evoked activity maps were calculated from pairwise correlations of averaged (8 odor presentations) ΔF maps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Two-Photon Microscopy for Viral Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral expression was assessed by measuring fluorescence beginning 3 weeks after injection using a custom-made two-photon microscope equipped with resonant mirrors to allow for video rate sampling (Scholl et al., 2017 (link)). Fluorescence was detected using standard PMTs (R6357, Hamamatsu, Japan) and then amplified with a high-speed current amplifier (Femto DHPCA-100, Germany). Images were acquired at 400 μm × 400 μm fields of view using a 16× objective (Nikon N16XLWD-PF, Japan). Imaging data were motion corrected using cross correlation (Guizar-Sicairos et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The non-linear optical microscope used in the experiment for Two-photon Excited Fluorescence (TPEF) data acquisition was based on a confocal imaging system (LSM510Meta, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) coupled to an external tunable mode-locked Ti:Sapphire laser (Mai-Tai broadband, Spectra-Physics, USA)17 (link). The laser line was tuned to a 900 nm wavelength and routed by a dichroic mirror (reflect > 700 nm, transmit < 543 nm), through an objective lens (Plan-Neofluar, 20X, NA = 0.5, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) to the tissue specimen. TPEF signals were collected by the same objective lens in the epi-mode, passing through the dichroic mirror (reflect < 490 nm, transmit > 490 nm) and a 500–550 nm band-pass (BP) filter, before being recorded by a photomultiplier tube (PMT, Hamamatsu R6357, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Confocal Imaging of Fluorescence Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal images of fluorescence labeled sections were acquired with a Leica AOBS SP2 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany), using a high resolution Leica 63×/1.4 plan apochromatic oil immersion objective. The acquisition software was Leica Confocal Software TCS SP2. The laser lines used were 405 nm (for DAPI), 488 nm (for Alexa Fluor 488) and 594 nm (for Alexa Fluor 594), produced by ultraviolet diode, argon and helium-neon lasers (Leica AOBS SP2 module), respectively. The respective emission signals were collected sequentially to avoid cross excitation, as well as the crosstalk using AOBS tunable filters as follow; 410–480 nm for DAPI, 504–571 nm for Alexa Fluor 488, and 597–751 nm for Alexa Fluor 594. While collecting the images, appropriate PMT offset level was used to minimize the auto-fluorescence and images were framed an average of 3–4 times to minimize the noise. All images and spectral data were captured using the PMT detectors (R6357, Hamamatsu) located inside the scan head. Spectral scanning was performed throughout the experiments to confirm the specificity of the Alexa Fluor signal emission profiles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!