The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cs 200

Manufactured by Konica Minolta
Sourced in Japan

The CS-200 is a color and brightness measuring instrument designed for laboratory use. It provides precise measurements of color and luminance characteristics of various materials and surfaces. The device is capable of measuring a wide range of parameters, including chromaticity coordinates, correlated color temperature, and luminous intensity. It is intended for applications that require accurate and standardized color and brightness evaluation in a controlled environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using cs 200

1

Characterization of OLED Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker NMR spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. TGA and DSC measurements were performed on a Netzsch TG 209 and a Netzsch DSC 209 under N2, respectively. A CHI600D electrochemical work station with a platinum working electrode and a platinum wire counter electrode at a scanning rate of 100 mV s−1 against a Ag/Ag+ (0.1 M of AgNO3 in acetonitrile) reference electrode were utilized for cyclic voltammetry measurements. UV–vis absorption spectra were measured using a HP 8453 spectrophotometer and PL and LTPL spectra were measured with a Jobin-Yvon spectrofluorometer. PLQY spectra were measured on a Hamamatsu absolute PL quantum yield spectrometer C11347. Transient PL spectra were measured with an Edinburgh FL920 fluorescence spectrophotometer. The current density–voltage–luminance characteristics of the OLED devices were measured with a Keithley 2420 and Konica Minolta chromameter CS-200. The EL spectra were measured with a Photo Research PR705 device.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Calibration of Visual Stimuli Display

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This experiment was performed using a monitor (UP2516D, Dell; 2,560 × 1,440 pixels, Adobe RGB monitor), equipment, script environment (Psychtoolbox 3.0.15, Brainard, 1997 (link) on Matlab R2018a, Mathworks), and calibration with a chroma meter (CS-200, Konica Minolta, Japan), which were the same as those employed in a previous study (Kanematsu and Koida, 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of PeLEDs Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PeLEDs were driven by a Keithley 2450 source-meter as a voltage source in ambient air without encapsulation. The luminance, CE and EQE were collected with an Ocean Optics Flame spectrometer and an integrating sphere. Calibration of the spectrometer was done as reported in our previous work50 (link). The luminance was cross-checked using a luminance meter (Konica Minolta, CS-200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fabrication of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The substrates were cleaned with ultrapurified water and organic solvents (acetone, then isopropanol), and then dry-cleaned for 30 min through exposure to UV–ozone. Organic layers were deposited onto ITO substrates under vacuum (=10−5 Pa), successively. LiF and Al were patterned using a shadow mask with an array of 2 mm × 2 mm openings without breaking the vacuum (=10−5 Pa). The electroluminescent (EL) were taken using an optical multichannel analyzer Hamamatsu Photonics PMA-11. The current density–voltage and luminance–voltage characteristics were measured using a Keithley 2400 source measure unit and a Minolta CS200 luminance meter, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Organic Light-Emitting Diode Device Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glass substrates pre-coated with a 95 nm thin layer of indium tin oxide (ITO) with a sheet resistance of 20 Ω per square were thoroughly cleaned for 10 min in ultrasonic bath of acetone, isopropyl alcohol, detergent, deionized water, and isopropyl alcohol and then treated with O2 plasma for 5 min in sequence. Organic layers were deposited onto the ITO-coated substrates by high-vacuum (< 5 × 10−4 Pa) thermal evaporation. Deposition rates were controlled by independent quartz crystal oscillators, which were 1 ~ 2 Å s−1 for organic materials, 0.1 Å s−1 for LiF, and 6 Å s−1 for Al, respectively. The emission area of the devices was 3 × 3 mm−2 as shaped by the overlapping area of the anode and cathode. All the device characterization steps were carried out at room temperature under ambient laboratory conditions without encapsulation except spectrum collection process. EL spectra were taken by an optical analyzer, Photo Research PR705. Current density and luminance vs. driving voltage characteristics were measured by Keithley 2,420 and Konica Minolta chromameter CS-200, respectively. External quantum efficiencies were calculated by assuming that the devices were Lambertian light sources.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visual Stimulus Presentation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were presented on a liquid crystal monitor (UP2516D, Dell; 2560 × 1440 pixels, 59 Hz frame rate, Adobe RGB). The monitor was connected via a HDMI cable to the onboard graphics card (Intel HD Graphics 620, 8 bits) of a PC running Microsoft Windows 10 Home Edition (64 bits). Color and luminance were calibrated with the chroma meter CS-200 (Konica Minolta, Japan) under the same illumination condition as the experiment. Pixel intensity was measured in sub-pixel resolution using a microscope (Dinolite basic, Dinolite), and the confirmed gray lines were the same across stimuli. The experiment was controlled using custom software developed using MATLAB 2018a (Mathworks) and Psychtoolbox 3.0.1535 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!