The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

58 protocols using anti mouse cd16 cd32

1

Multiparametric Immunophenotyping of Myeloid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To reduce nonspecific binding to cells bearing Fc receptors, preincubation of cells with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience) was performed prior to all antibody stainings. Dead cells were excluded by FxCycle Violet (Thermo Fisher Scientific) staining. Stained cells were analyzed using a BD FACSCanto II or analyzed and FACS-sorted using a BD Aria cell sorting platform. The frequencies of individual cell populations were quantified with FlowJo software. FACS antibodies used in this study were: rat anti-CD11b (eBioscience, PE-Cy7), rat anti-CD31 (BioLegend, FITC), rat anti-F4/80 (BioLegend, PE), rat anti-Ly6C (BioLegend, APC-Cy7), rat anti-Ly6G (BioLegend, Pacific Blue), rat anti-Tie2 (Invitrogen, APC) and rat anti-CD206 (BD Biosciences, Alexa Fluor 488). Single-stained controls and an unstained control were used for compensation, rat-IgG1 κ (eBioscience, APC) was used as isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating T Cell Cytokine Production

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to evaluate T cell cytokine production. Ipsilateral draining lymph nodes of BALB/c graft recipients were harvested at 8 weeks after transplantation. T lymphocytes were positively isolated, using CD90.2 magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA) and stimulated in triplicates with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; 50 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) and Ionomycin (1 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) for ~12 h with the addition of GolgiPlug (0.6 μl/ml; Brefeldin, BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Cells were then collected, thoroughly washed, blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience) and stained with a FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 antibody. Cells were fixed and permeabilized with fixation/permeabilization buffers (eBioscience) and intracellularly stained with an allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-IFN-γ antibody (BD Pharmingen). All experiments were conducted with parallel staining using appropriate isotype controls (BD Pharmingen) and cells were analyzed using the PICS XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometry Antibody Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed as previously described (27 (link)). All the conjugated antibodies were purchased from eBioscience and detailed information is given in Supplementary Table 2. Fc Blocking Ab (catalog # 14-9161-73), anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (catalog # 14-0161-82), fixation/Permeabilization concentrate (catalog# 00-5123-56), fixation/Permeabilization diluent (catalog # 00-5223-56), and permeabilization buffer (catalog# 00-8333-56) were also purchased from eBioscience. Cytometry data were acquired on a BD LSRFortessa 6-Laser flow cytometer and analyzed on Flowjo 6 software. This work was supported by the Northwestern University – Flow Cytometry Core Facility supported by Cancer Center Support Grant (NCI CA060553).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phenotyping Germinal Center B Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Axillary lymph nodes were collected from immunized mice 21 days after receiving a second immunization and single cell suspensions were prepared. Cell suspensions were washed with FACS wash buffer (PBS with 1% BSA and 0.05% sodium azide) and were first stained with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience) for 15 minutes, at 4°C. Following another wash with FACS wash buffer, cells were incubated with purified anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience) as a Fc block, for 5 minutes. Lymph node cells were then stained for 30 minutes, at 4 °C, with AF647-conjugated anti-mouse Ly77/GL7 (clone GL7) and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (clone RA3-6B2) (BD Biosciences). After washing the cells with FACS wash buffer, cells were resuspended with PBS containing 1% formaldehyde and 0.02% sodium azide. Single-stained/FMO controls and compensation beads were used where appropriate to correct for spectral overlap. Using a BD LSRF Fortessa flow cytometer, 50,000 singlet events were recorded. Data analysis was performed using BD FACSDIVA 6.2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Monocyte and Neutrophil Identification by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected via retro orbital bleeding with EDTA-coated capillaries. Red blood cells were lysed with RBL buffer (Sigma Aldrich), and blocking achieved with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience). Monocytes were identified by staining with PE anti-mouse CD115 (Biolegend) and APC anti-mouse Ly-6G/Ly-6C (Biolegend)18 (link), 19 (link). Neutrophils were identified as CD45hiCD115loLy6-C/Ghi cells. Flow cytometry was performed using a LSRII analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Melanoma Immune Cell Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melanoma tissues were digested with 1 U/ml collagenase (Sigma Aldrich, Italy), passed through 70-μm cell strainers and red blood cells (RBC) were lysed to prepare single cell suspensions. Cell samples were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA). Antibodies against CD11c-FITC, CD11b-PeCy5.5, Gr1-PE or Gr1-allophycocyanin, CD3-PeCy5.5; CD8-allophycocyanin or CD8-PE; CD4-allophycocyanin; NK1.1-PE were obtained from eBioscience and BioLegend. Expression of FAP in melanoma tissue was also analyzed by flow cytometry by using an anti-FAP-FITC and expressed as percentage of positive cells. Data were acquired with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of SVF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stromal vascular fraction from epididymal fat depots was isolated as described above. After lysing erythrocytes, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer (2% FCS in PBS) and counted on a CASY Counter. Here, 1,000,000 cells were used for cell surface staining, whereas 3,000,000 ones for intracellular staining. Co-cultures were separated using Cell Stripper (ThermoFisher) and resuspended in FACS buffer. Cell surface antigens were blocked with Anti-Mouse CD16/CD32 (1/300,14-0161, eBioscience) and stained for TCRb (1/400, PerCpCy5.5, 45-5961 Invitrogen), TCRgd (1/400, APC, 17-5711 Invitrogen), CD4 (1/400, PeCy7, 25-0041, Invitrogen), CD8 (1/400, APC-eFluor 780, 47-0081 Invitrogen), CD11c (1/400, PerCpCy5.5 45-0114 Invitrogen), CD19 (1/400, PeCy7 25-0193 Invitrogen), CD11b (1/400, PerCpCy5.5 45-0112 Invitrogen), CD11b (1/400, APC 17-0112 Invitrogen), CD11b (1/400, AF488, 53-0112-82, Invitrogen) F4/80 (1/400, PeCy7 25-4801), F4/80 (1/400, AF700, 56-4801-82 Invitrogen), and CD206 (1/400, FITC 123005 Biolegend). Staining of Tregs was done using Mouse Regulatory T Cell Staining Kit (88-8111 eBioscience). FACS measurement was done on a Canto II or LSR II (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Monocyte and Neutrophil Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected via tail vein bleeding with EDTA-coated capillary tubes. Red blood cells were lysed with BD Pharm Lyse (BD Biosciences), and blocking achieved with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience). Monocytes were identified by staining with PE anti-mouse CD115 (Biolegend) and APC anti-mouse Ly6G/Ly6C (Biolegend). Neutrophils were identified as CD45hiCD115loLy6-C/Ghi by flow cytometry using a LSRII analyzer. Intracellular ROS was assessed via dihydroethidium (Invitrogen) staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiplex Immunostaining of Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples obtained at the day of lobectomy were frozen and stored at −80 °C. Frozen specimens were sectioned at 4–6 μm with a cryostat, placed on slides, air dried and fixed for 5 min with 100% acetone. Before incubation with antibodies, Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience) 10% in PBS for 30 min. Two stainings were performed: a triple-staining CD8, 103 and E-cadherin and a double-staining CD8 and CD49a using conjugated antibodies (PE labelled anti-human CD103 (eBioscience); FITC-labelled anti-human CD8 (eBioscience); AF647-labelled anti-human E-Cadherin (Biolegend) and PE-labelled anti-human CD49a (Biolegend)). Isotype-matched antibodies were used as negative controls. Nuclei were highlighted using DAPI mounting medium. The procedure and the source and concentrations of antibodies are detailed in Supplementary Table 2.
Slides of stained lung sections were scanned with an automatized fluorescent microscope Axio Scan.Z1 (Zeiss) at the magnification × 200. A coupled Zen software was used to analyse the virtual slides. For each slide, counts were done by a senior pathologist on at least five representative fields with a magnification of × 200.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenotyping Melanoma Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions were prepared from harvested melanoma tissues. Tissues were dissected and digested with collagenase 1U/ml, passed through 70-μm cell strainers and red blood cells (RBC) were lysed. Cell samples were pre-incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) to block non-specific Fc-mediated interactions. Antibodies against CD11c-FITC, CD11b-PeCy5.5, Gr1-PE or Gr1-allophycocyanin, CD3-PeCy5.5; CD8-allophycocyanin or CD8-PE; CD4-allophycocyanin; NK1.1-PE were obtained from eBioscience and BioLegend. Data were acquired with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!