The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using anti tfeb

1

Characterizing Immune Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen sections were incubated with anti-CD45 (1:200, BD), anti-Mac3-6 (1:50, Santa Cruz), anti-CD68 (1:200, AbD Serotec), anti-CD206 (1:200, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-TFEB (1:200, Bethyl) antibodies, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (1:300) (Thermo Fisher, Inc., Waltham, MA). The nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342. The fluorescence signal was measured with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIP Assay for GLS mRNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Pierce Magnetic ChIP Kit (Thermo Scientific) was used to conduct the ChIP assays in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the cells were treated with temozolomide (100 μM) for 72 h followed by fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde and incubation with glycine. The cells were then lysed and subjected to the MNase digestion. The lysates were sonicated to obtain DNA fragments with shear lengths of 200–1000 bp using three sets of 20 s sonication pulses. The anti-normal Rabbit IgG included in the kit or anti-TFEB (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA) antibodies were used to precipitate the DNA-protein complexes. The immunoprecipitated DNA was then examined by PCR. Primers specific for GLS mRNA were used as follows: Sense, 5’-GGGTTAAATTTCAGTGGACTC-3’; antisense, 5’-CAGGACAATGGGAAAGTACTTAG-3’.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Staining of BMDM Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining of BMDM or sorted cells, fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 min and blocked with 5% goat serum/PBS for 30min. Cells were then incubated with 1:500 primary antibody in 5% goat serum/PBS for 2 h at RT. Primary antibodies used were: anti-TFEB (Bethyl Laboratories, A303-673A), anti-TFE3 (Sigma, HPA023881), anti-LAMP1 (Invitrogen, 14-1071-82), anti-ATP6V0D2 (Sigma, SAB2103221, verified using isotype control), anti- ATP6V1B2 antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-166122, verified using isotype control) and anti-CTSB (Abcam, ab58802). Then cells were washed three times with PBS and stained with 1:1000 secondary antibody tagged with Alexa Fluor 647 (see S1 Table). Samples were washed three times with PBS and mounted ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunostaining of Insulin-Producing Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For staining of cells, INS-1E were plated onto coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and immunostaining performed as in [18 (link)]. The primary antibodies used in this study included anti-CTSD (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, SC-6487), anti-NFATC1 (BD Pharmingen, 556602) and anti-SQSTM1 (Progen, GP62-C). Cells were imaged using a Nikon TE2000 (×100). Lysosomal puncta as determined by CTSD puncta were quantified using Blobfinder software (Uppsala University, Sweden). TFEB and NFATC1 translocation were quantified by measurement of the mean pixel intensity for the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments using ImageJ and the nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio calculated. For these calculations, >5 images were taken per condition for each independent experiment.
For immunostaining of tissue, indirect immunofluorescence staining was carried out as in [18 (link)]. The primary antibodies used in this study included anti-CTSD (Proteintech, 21327-1-AP), anti-INS (Dako, A0564), anti-SQSTM1 and anti-TFEB (Bethyl Laboratories, A303). Tissue was imaged using a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-S and 10–15 islets imaged per condition. The intensity of INS staining and SQSTM1, TFEB and CTSD puncta within INS positive areas was quantified using FIJI software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Assay for TFEB and TFE3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TFEB and TFE3 immunofluorescence, cells treated with mitochondrial stressors were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100. Cells were then blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin in PBS. After sequential incubation of cells with anti-TFEB (Bethyl Laboratories, 1:200) or anti-TFE3 Ab (Sigma, 1:200) at 4 °C overnight and then with anti-rabbit secondary Abs conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen) for 1 h, fluorescence was visualized with an LSM780 confocal microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Antibody Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-GAPDH (6C5), anti-GFP (IF), anti-SM22α, and anti-TBX18 were purchased from Abcam. Anti-CD31 was purchased from BD Pharmingen. Anti-TFEB (WB) was purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. Anti-Cre Recombinase (D7L7L), anti-Flag tag, anti-PDGFRα (D1E1E), anti-PDGFRβ (28E1), anti-Slug (C19G7), Anti-TFEB (ChIP-seq), and anti-Vimentin (D21H3) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-TGIF1 (H-172) and anti-WT1 (C19) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-αSMA (1A4) and anti-vinculin (V9131) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-GFP (IHC), anti-cTnT, and anti-ZO1 were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. HRP goat anti-mouse and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (WB) were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories. EnVision+ System- HRP Labelled Polymer Anti-Rabbit (IHC) was purchased from Dako. Alexa Fluor 555 donkey anti-mouse, Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit, Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-rat and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-chicken secondary antibodies (IF) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Catalog numbers, dilutions and validation information for the antibodies is reported in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Neuronal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence analysis, cells were fixed in 4% (Vol/Vol) paraformaldehyde for 15 min then blocked in 8% (Vol/Vol) HyClone Fetal Bovine Serum (Thermo Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature. This was followed by incubation with primary antibodies in blocking buffer containing 0.2% Saponin (Sigma-Aldrich) over night at 4°C. Cells were then washed with PBS and incubated with the corresponding fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 594, Invitrogen) at 1:500 for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium containing DAPI (VectorLabs) to label the nuclei. The following primary antibodies were used (all at 1:200 dilution unless otherwise stated): anti-LMX1 (Millipore), anti-Nurr1 (R&D Systems), anti-VMAT2 (Proteintech, 20873-1-AP), anti-GIRK2 (Proteintech, 21647-1-AP and Millipore, AB5200), anti-MAP2 (Millipore, MAB3418), anti-FoxA2 (Millipore, AB4125), anti-mTOR (Cell Signaling, 2972) 1:100, anti-phospho-mTOR-Ser2448 (Cell Signaling, 5536) 1:100, anti-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Cell Signaling, 2217) 1: 200, anti-phosphoS6-Ser235/236 (Cell Signaling, 2211 and 4856) anti-LAMP1 (U. Iowa Developmental Hybridoma Bank, H4A3) 1:100, anti-Tuj1 (Neuromics, MO15013 and BioLegend, 801207), anti-TFEB (Bethyl Laboratories, A303-673A), anti-Tyrosine Hydroxylase (Sigma-Aldirch, T1299), and anti-Bip/Grp78 (abcam, ab21685).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described.23 The membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with the following primary antibodies: anti‐collagen I (Abcam, ab34710), anti‐TGF‐β1 (Abcam, ab92486), anti‐fibronectin (Abcam, ab23750), anti‐LC3B (Sigma, L7543), anti‐p62/SQSTM1 (Abcam, ab91526), anti‐Cathepsin B (Abcam, ab58802), anti‐phospho‐mTOR (Ser2448) (Cell Signaling, 5536S), anti‐mTOR (Cell Signaling, 2983S), anti‐phospho‐4E‐BP1(Thr37/46) (Cell Signaling, 2855S), anti‐4E‐BP1 (Cell Signaling, 9644S), anti‐phospho‐TFEB (Ser142) (Millipore, ABE1971‐I), anti‐TFEB (BETHYL, A303‐672). β‐actin (Santa Cruz, sc‐47778) and GAPDH (Absin Bioscience, abs132004) were used as the loading control in vivo and in vitro experiments, respectively. The membranes were washed with PBS‐T five times and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase‐labelled secondary antibody (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) for 1 h at room temperature. After visualized with Clarity Max™ Western ECL Blotting Substrates (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the Azure C500 Western Blot Imaging System (Azure Biosystems, Dublin, CA, USA) was used to detect the immunoreactive signals. The optical density of each band was then quantified using ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lysosome Dynamics in Francisella Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For LysoTracker staining and colocalization with F. novicida, WT and Ctsb−/− BMDMs were infected with GFP-expressing F. novicida and followed by labeling with 100 nM LysoTracker (L-7528; Molecular Probes) for the last 30 min. Cells were washed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three times and mounted using mounting medium (H-1200; Vector Laboratories). For LC3B, LAMP1, and TFEB immunostaining, uninfected and infected BMDMs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were then permeabilized with cold methanol for 5 min, washed with PBS, and blocked in 1× ELISA buffer with 0.1% saponin for 1 h. Cells were stained with anti-LC3B (NB600-1384; Novus Biologicals), anti-LAMP1 (14-1071-85; eBioscience), or anti-TFEB (A303-673A; Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.), all at 1:500 dilution, overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed, stained with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h, and mounted using mounting medium (H-1200; Vector Laboratories). Cells were observed on a confocal microscope (Axio Observer; Z1; SlideBook 6 software; ZEISS) for image acquisition and data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in ODG buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 2% octyl-β-D-glucoside, 5% glycerol, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM NaF, and protease inhibitors). Equal amounts of total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Membranes were blocked and incubated with primary antibodies, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Signals were visualized on a WSE6200H LuminoGraph II (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). Representative blots obtained from at least three independent experiments are shown. For pull-down assays in E. coli, cell lysates expressing His-tagged p18 were incubated with HisTrap beads, and precipitates were subjected to Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and western blotting. The following antibodies were used: anti-p18, anti-p14, anti-MP1, anti-HBXIP, anti-p10, anti-mTOR, and anti-phospho-S6K (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-actin, anti-LAMP1 and anti-S6K (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-TFEB (Bethyl Laboratories Inc). Catolog numbers and dilutions of these antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 5. All experiments were repeated at least three times, and representative blots are displayed in all figures. Uncropped images of western blots are shown in Supplementary Figs. 1720.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!