The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using typhoon system

1

DNA Unwinding by HerA and NurA Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA unwinding reactions, using the D58A nuclease inactive NurA protein (16 (link)). 0.5 μM of WT or mutant hexameric HerA and 0.5 μM dimeric D58A NurA were preincubated at 60°C for 20 mins before addition of a 10 nM 32P-labelled double-stranded DNA substrate and incubated at 60°C for 30 mins. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 20 μl stop buffer (100 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, 0.1 % bromophenol blue and 50% glycerol), and separated on 12% SDS-PAGE in 1x TBE (Tris, Borate, EDTA), 0.2% SDS at 7.5 Vcm−1. Gels were dried and results were visualised by phosphoimaging (GE Healthcare Typhoon system). Further experimental details are described in the Supplementary Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Autoradiographic Imaging of MAGL Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen sections of OCT-embedded liver tissue were cut (20 μm thick sections) using cryostat (Microm Typ HM 500; Microm). Briefly, frozen sections were activated in Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), then incubated with [18F]MAGL-4-11 in the buffer. Sections were exposed to storage phosphor screens (GE) for 2 h. The screen was read with a GE Typhoon system at a resolution of 20 μm × 20 μm. Autoradiographic images were then analyzed using Image Quant image analysis software (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Surface Receptor Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell surface receptors and conditioned media [125 I]-TGF-β1 crosslinking and binding methods have been extensively described previously [2 (link), 39 (link), 60 (link)]. Cell surface receptor binding was conducted in a cold room to inhibit receptor internalization. For cell surface labeling, 100 pM of [125 I]-TGF-β1 in HEPES-KRH Buffer was used (Final concentration. NaCl, 116 mM. KCl, 4 mM. MgCl2, 1 mM. CaCl2, 1.8 mM. Glucose, 25 mM. HEPES acid, 10 mM. Adjust pH to 7.4). For shed-BG binding, conditioned media from BG GAG mutant expressing cells were incubated in full-serum media or serum-free media, as noted in the figure legends, and were directly labeled with 200 pM of [125 I]-TGF-β1. Washing steps were omitted in conditioned media BG binding. Cell lysate samples were lysed with 2 × Laemmli sample buffer or CO-IP buffer, followed by the immunoprecipitation protocol described above. SDS-page gels were dried onto a filter paper at 80°C for 2.5 hrs on a gel dryer. Dried gels on filter papers were developed onto a phosphor screen for 10 – 21 days. Imaging of the phosphor screen was performed on the GE Typhoon system. The scanned image was then analyzed using ImageQuant software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DNA Unwinding by HerA and NurA Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA unwinding reactions, using the D58A nuclease inactive NurA protein (16 (link)). 0.5 μM of WT or mutant hexameric HerA and 0.5 μM dimeric D58A NurA were preincubated at 60°C for 20 mins before addition of a 10 nM 32P-labelled double-stranded DNA substrate and incubated at 60°C for 30 mins. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 20 μl stop buffer (100 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, 0.1 % bromophenol blue and 50% glycerol), and separated on 12% SDS-PAGE in 1x TBE (Tris, Borate, EDTA), 0.2% SDS at 7.5 Vcm−1. Gels were dried and results were visualised by phosphoimaging (GE Healthcare Typhoon system). Further experimental details are described in the Supplementary Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Fluorescent Immunoblotting of DNA Repair Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as described (Yang et al. 2020 (link)). The following antibodies were used: mTRF1 (#1449), mTRF2 (#1254), mXPB (Bethyl Laboratories A301-337A), mXPD (CST 11963), mZRANB3 (Abclonal A9555), mPOLD3 (Proteintech 21935-1-AP), mMNAT1 (Proteintech 11719-1-AP), mCDK7 (Proteintech 27027-1-AP), mCCNH (Proteintech 67065-1-Ig), mXPA (Proteintech 16462-1-AP), mCHK1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-8408), phospho-mCHK1 S345 (CST 2348), mGAPDH (Thermo Fisher MA5-15738), and γ-Tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich GTU88).
For quantitative fluorescent immunoblotting, membranes were blocked with Intercept TBS blocking buffer (Li-Cor 927-60001) for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibodies for 2 h. After three TBST washes, membranes were incubated with fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies IRDye 800CW goat antirabbit (Li-Cor 925-32211) and IRDye 680RD goat antimouse (Li-Cor 925-68070) for 1 h, followed by three TBST washes. Imaging was performed with a GE Typhoon system and quantified using ImageJ (1.51j8).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phosphoprotein Enrichment and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins in phosphoprotein-enriched fractions were precipitated with a 2-D Clean-Up kit (GE Healthcare; http://www.gelifesciences.com/). Precipitates were dissolved in three equal volumes of precipitant buffer provided by the manufacturer, and the mixture was put on ice for 15 min. The precipitate was recovered by centrifugation and dissolved in the same volume of co-precipitant, and the precipitate was again recovered by centrifugation. The precipitate was dissolved in 25 µl of water, and 1 ml of wash buffer and 5 µl of wash additive were added to the sample. After incubation at –20°C for 30 min, the precipitate was recovered, air-dried and dissolved in buffer that contained 30 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.5), 2 M thiourea, 7 M urea and 4% CHAPS. Phosphorylated proteins were labeled with the CyDye™ DIGE Fluor Minimal Labeling kit (GE Healthcare) with Cy2, Cy3 or Cy5 according to the manufacturer’s protocol: 400 pmol of dye was added to 50 µg of protein in the above buffer and the mixture was kept on ice for 30 min. A mixture of labeled proteins from wild-type and mutant plants was then subjected to isoelectric focusing with Immobiline™ DryStrip and Ettan IPGphor II (GE Healthcare). After subsequent SDS–PAGE, protein spots were visualized with the Typhoon system (GE Healthcare), and the intensity of each spot was determined with DeCyder software (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Telomeric Overhang Analysis by TRF Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TRF analysis was conducted as described previously (Celli and de Lange 2005 (link)). Briefly, 1 million cells were embedded in 1% agarose plugs in PBS, digested with 1 mg/mL proteinase K in digestion buffer (100 mM EDTA, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 1% sodium lauryl sarcosine), and washed extensively in TE buffer (10 mM Tris at pH 8, 1 mM EDTA). The DNA in the plugs was digested with 60 U of AluI and MboI overnight. Plugs were run on a 1% agarose gel using pulse field gel electrophoresis, and the gel was dried. 32P-γ-ATP-labeled TelC probes ([CCCTAA]4) were used for probing telomeric overhang under native conditions. After washing and imaging, the gel was denatured, reprobed, and imaged again. Imaging was performed with a GE Typhoon system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

TERRA Detection by Northern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Northern blot for detection of TERRA was adapted from a previous study (Azzalin et al. 2007 (link)). Briefly, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol. Five micrograms of RNA was run on a 1.2% agarose gel in FA buffer (20 mM MOPS at pH 7.0, 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 0.67% formaldehyde). After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in 0.05 M NaOH and 1.5 M NaCl for 10 min and then in 10× SSC for 15 min. The RNA was then transferred onto a nylon N+ membrane and cross-linked by UV. The membrane was blocked in Church buffer (50% sodium phosphate buffer [0.684 M Na2HPO4, 0.316 M NaH2PO4 at pH 7.2], 1 mM EDTA, 7% SDS, 1% BSA) for 90 min at 55°C followed by hybridization overnight at 60°C with 32P-γ-ATP-labeled TelC probes ([CCCTAA]4). The membrane was then washed twice with 2× SSC and 0.2% SDS and once with 0.5× SSC and 0.2% SDS at 55°C, and finally exposed to a PhosphorImager screen and scanned using the GE Typhoon system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted using Plant Protein Extraction Reagent kit (CWBIO, China). Approximate 1 g plant tissues were used for each sample. Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes according to standard protocols. Membranes were probed with anti-GFP antibody (Beyotime Biotechnology, China) at a 1:2000 dilution and signals were visualized on a Typhoon system (GE Healthcare, http://www.gelifesciences.com/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Telomeric Overhang Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TRF analysis was conducted as described previously (Celli and de Lange 2005 (link)). Briefly, 1 million cells were embedded in 1% agarose plugs and treated with 1 μg/mL proteinase K overnight, followed by extensive wash with TE, after which the plugs were digested with 60 U of AluI and MboI overnight. Plugs were run out in a 1% agarose gel using pulse field gel electrophoresis and the gel was dried. [γ-32P]ATP-labeled TelC probe ([CCCTAA]4) was used for probing telomeric overhang under native condition overnight. After washing and imaging, the gel was denatured, reprobed, and imaged again. Imaging was performed with a GE Typhoon system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!