The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using pd 1 bv421

1

PBMC Phenotypic Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryopreserved PBMCs were thawed and washed in R10 medium (RPMI1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin). PBMCs were stained with Fixable viability Dye eFluor 780 (Thermofisher), CD3-FITC (Biolegend, clone OKT3) and PD-1-BV421 (Biolegend, clone EH12.2H7). Following fixation with 4% PFA, stained cells were acquired on an LSR-II cytometer (BD) and data were analyzed on Flow-Jo version 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-Parameter Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with UV live/dead stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and TruStain FcX block (BioLegend, San Diego, CA) prior to Ab staining. IL-10 detection was performed using the IL-10 secretion assay following overnight ex vivo stimulation (Miltenyi Biotec). Cells were stained with Abs to CD4-allophycocyanin Fire 780 (BioLegend), T cell Ig and mucin domain containing 3 (Tim3)-allophycocyanin (BioLegend), CTLA4-allophycocyanin (BioLegend), CD49b-AF647 (BioLegend), CD49b-PE-Cy7 (BD Biosciences), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)–allophycocyanin (BioLegend), PD1-BV421 (BioLegend), lymphocyte activating gene 3 (Lag3)–BV785 (BioLegend), F4/80-BV711 (BD Biosciences), and Foxp3-AF488 (BioLegend). Cells were washed in MACS buffer before being analyzed on either a FACSAria SORP (BD Biosciences), LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences), or Attune NxT (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with support of the Cytometry & Imaging Microscopy Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. Cell sorting was performed on a FACSAria SORP (BD Biosciences). All FACS data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow cytometric analysis of CAR-T cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The anti-PD-1 antibody PD-1-BV421 (Biolegend, 329920) and anti-CD3 antibody CD3-FITC (BD Bioscience, 340542) were used for flow cytometric analysis of PD-1 and TCR expression in control cells and MPTK-CAR-T cell products. Control cells were derived from the same donor and had the same culture conditions as the MPTK-CAR-T cell products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Germinal Center T Follicular Helper Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LNs were stained and optically cleared as previously described (80 (link)). Volume staining was performed using the following antibodies/dilutions: B220-eFluor 615 (ThermoFisher, clone RA3–6B2) 1:80; CD4-Alexa Fluor 488 (BioLegend, clone RM4–5) 1:80, PD1-BV421 (BioLegend, clone RMP1–30) 1:80, FoxP3-eFluor 570 (ThermoFisher, clone FJK-16s) 1:50, BCL6-Alexa Fluor 647 (BD Biosciences, clone K112–91) 1:50; CD35-BV510 (BD Biosciences, clone 8C12) 1:300. Confocal imaging was performed on an inverted Leica SP8 microscope using a 40× 1.3 NA oil immersion objective. 3D image stacks were analyzed using Imaris 9.2.1 (Bitplane). 3D image stacks were analyzed using Imaris 9.6.0. (Bitplane). GC surfaces were delineated as BCL6+ volumes at a smoothing resolution of 10μm. Within GCs, T cells were delineated as CD4+ volumes at a smoothing resolution of 0.569μm. Among GC-T cells, GC-TFH cells were identified as BCL6+ PD1+ T cells. To determine the relevant BCL6+ and PD1+ cutoffs, three separate 0.333*106 μm3 control volumes were sampled from the B cell follicle (not intersecting any GCs) in each image, T cells were segmented as CD4+ volumes, and the 95th–99th percentiles of BCL6 and PD1 expression among these non-GC-T cells were calculated. From these delineations of GC regions and GC-TFH cells, the volume of each GC and the density of GC-TFH cells were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Immune Cell Profiles in Treated Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thawed PBMCs samples were taken from five patients (two in cured group and three in uncured group). A total of 15 blood samples were collected at 3 time points: day 0 (the day before), week 24, and week 48 of treatment. Samples were washed 3 times by 1x PBS with centrifugation at 400 g for 6 min and counted for cell numbers. 500,000 cells per tube were then stained for 30 min on ice with antibodies. For flow cytometric analyses, the following antibodies were used: CD3 (CD3-FITC; BioLegend, cat#300305), CD4 (CD4-APC-Cy7; BioLegend, cat#317418), CD8 (CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5; BioLegend, cat#344710), CD19 (CD19-APC; BioLegend, cat#302212), CD20 (CD20-PE; BioLegend, cat#302306), CD25 (CD25-APC; BioLegend, cat#302610), CD127 (CD127-PE; BioLegend, cat#351304), and PD-1 (PD-1-BV421; BioLegend, cat#329920). Cells stained by antibodies were resuspended in 1x PBS, and analyzed by flow cytometry using BD LSR Fortessa cell analyzer. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo (version 10.4.0). Accordingly, B cells and Treg cells were selected as CD19+ CD20+ and CD3+ CD4 + CD25+ CD127 subsets, independent CD3+ clustering of either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells with PD-1+ used for identifying PD-1 expression respectively from lymphocytes. Flow cytometry gating strategies for CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ T cell populations see Supplementary Figure 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparameter Immunophenotyping of Influenza-Infected Ferret Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymph node cell suspensions from influenza infected ferret were stained with the following panel: live/dead Blue (Thermo Fisher), CD79a PerCP-Cy5.5 (HM47; BioLegend)24 (link), CD8 AF700 (OKT8; Thermo)24 (link), CD4 FITC (from CSIRO)25 (link), BCL6 AF647 (K112-91; BD), BCL6 AF647 (IG191E/A8; BioLegend), CXCR5 BV421 (L138D7; BioLegend), CXCR5 BB515 (RF8B2; BD), CXCR5 PE (2G8, BD); CXCR5 Biotin (in-house), Streptavidin BV421 (BD), PD-1 BV786 (29F.1A12; BioLegend), PD-1 BV421 (EH12.2H7; BioLegend), PD-1 PE (in-house). For BCL6 staining, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained using the BD Transcription Factor Buffer kit (BD) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Macaque LN suspensions were stained with Live/dead Aqua (Thermo Fisher), CD4 BV605 (L200; BD), CXCR5 PECy7 (MU5UBEE, Thermo Fisher), and CD3 BUV737 (SP34-2, BD). All samples were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa using BD FACS Diva and data was analyzed in FlowJo v10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Immunophenotyping and Signaling Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry and ImageStream analysis: phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated LAG3 (eBioscience), PD1-botin (RMP1–14, Biolegend), PD1-BV421 (Biolegend), (perCP-conjugated CD8a (eBioscience), and FITC-conjugated Thy1.1. For immunoprecipitation: rat-anti-mLAG3 (BD, Pharmingen monoclonal), rat-anti-mPD-1 (a gift from T. Honjo, or eBioscience, Rat IgG2), control rat-IgG1 and IgG2 (Biolegend), control rabbit IgG (Santa-Cruz or Biolegend), rabbit anti-SHP2 (Santa-Cruz or AbCam). For Western blot analysis: goat anti-LAG-3 mAb (C9B7W, R&D Systems), goat anti-PD1 mAb (R&D Systems), anti-SHP1 (AbCam), anti-SHP2 (Santa-Cruz). All the secondary antibodies were from KPL. For confocal microscopy: rat-anti-mPD-1 (RMP1–14, from Tasuku Honjo, Osaka University), goat-anti-LAG3 (R&D Systems), rabbit-anti-EEA1 (Cell Signaling), rabbit-anti-Rab11b (Cell Signaling), rabbit-anti-LAMP1 (Cell Signaling), mouse-anti-TGN38 (BD Biosciences), rabbit-anti-tubulin-r (Biolegend), pLck (Cell Signaling). The following secondary antibodies, absorbed against cross-reactive species, were used: goat-Cy3 and mouse-DyLight-649 were from Jackson ImmunoResearch and rat-Alexafluo-488 and rabbit-Alexafluo-647 antibodies were from Molecular Probe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Immune Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed using the following directly conjugated antibodies:
(1) BD Biosciences: CD3-H7APC (SK7), CD45RA-Cy7PE (L48), CTLA-4-APC (BNI3),
IFN-g-FITC (B27), CCR7-Alexa700 (150503), CCR5-FITC (2D7/CCR5), CCR4-PE (1G1) and
IL-2-PE (MQ1-17H12), Ki67-FITC (B56); (2) Beckman Coulter: CD27-Alexa680
(IA4CD27), CD127-Cy5PE (R34.34), CD160-PE (BY55), BTLA-PE (J168-540); (3)
BioLegend: PD-1-BV421 (EH12.2H7), 2B4-FITC (CD244, C1.7), IL-17a-Cy5.5PerCP
(BL168), CCR6-Alexa647 (or PE, TG7/CCR6), CD27 Alexa647 (O323), CCR7 BV605
(G043H7), CXCR5 BV421 (J252D4), and CD154-Cy5PE (24–31); (4) Invitrogen:
CD4-Cy5.5PE (S3.5), CD27-QD605 (CLB-27/1), CD8-QD800 (3B5). A biotinylated
anti-PD-1 antibody was obtained from R&D (BAF 1086) and streptavidin-Qdot
655 was obtained from Molecular Probes. Quantum dots and Aqua amine viability dye
were obtained from Invitrogen. CD27-Alexa 594, TNF-a Alexa 594, HLA-DR BV650, and
CD38-Alexa 680 were conjugated in-house.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiparameter Flow Cytometric Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface markers were evaluated using combinations of fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies that were each titrated individually for their optimal stain index. PBMCs were stained at 10 million cells/mL in 200uL PBS. All PBMCs were incubated for 10 minutes with an amine-reactive viability dye (LIVE/DEAD Aqua, Invitrogen), washed twice, and then stained for 15 minutes at room temperature with combinations of monoclonal antibodies. For ex vivo phenotyping, cells were stained with CD3-AF700 (UCHT1, BD), CD4-PECy5 (RPA-T4, BD), CD8-APC-AF750 (3B5, Invitrogen), CD45RO-PETR (UCHL1, Beckman Coulter), CCR7-BV421 (150503, BD), CXCR5-AF488 (RF8B2, BD), PD-1-PE (EH12.2H7, BioLegend), CD14-V500 (M5E2, BD), and CD19-V500 (HIB19, BD). In vitro phenotyping was performed with combinations of CD3-AF700, CD4-PECy5, CD8-APC-AF750, CD45RO-PETR, CXCR5-AF488, CD14-V500, CD19-V500, ICOS-PE (DX29, BD), CD40L-PE (TRAP1, BD) and PD-1-BV421 (EH12.2H7, BioLegend). All PBMCs were washed twice after staining, fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed on a BD LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences) at the VMC Flow Cytometry Shared Resource.
Flow cytometry data was analyzed using BD Biosciences FACSDiva Software. In all experiments, forward and side scatter were used to identify lymphocytes and from that population non-viable, CD14+, CD19+, CD8+ cells were excluded from further analysis (Fig. S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pegylated Lipid-Polymer Nanoparticle Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MAL-PEG3000-b-PLA2000 was purchased from JenKem Technology Co. Ltd. All DNA sequences, fluorophore-modified CpG sequences, and thiol-modified primer were synthesized in Integrated DNA Technologies. T4 DNA ligase (4000 U/μl), phi29 DNA polymerase (10 U/μl), deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) solution mix (10 mM each nt), and 10× bovine serum albumin (BSA) in buffer solution were all purchased from New England Biolabs, and Cy5-modified dUTP was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences. R848 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. aPD-1 antibody was purchased from Bio X Cell Inc. All the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits used in this study were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Staining antibodies including anti–CD8-APC-Cy7, PD1-BV421, F4/80-PE (phycoerythrin), and CD11c-APC were purchased from BioLegend. Anti–CD80-PerCP-Cy5.5 and anti–CD86-PE were purchased from PeproTech. Anti-mouse SIINFEKL/H-2Kb-PE antibody was purchased from eBioscience. Dextramer-PE was purchased from Immudex. MC38 cell line was purchased from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, and DC2.4 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 2 mM l-glutamine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!