The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using progres cf camera

1

Apoptosis Analysis of Organ Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of fixed kidney, liver, lung and tumour from all mice were processed into paraffin wax ahead of sectioning at 5 μm. Tissue sections were analysed either for gross morphology by Haematoxylin and Eosin staining (using standard staining protocols) or for levels of apoptosis using the APO-BrdU TUNNEL Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Haematoxylin and Eosin stained sections were imaged using a CETI Magnum-T microscope connected to a Jenoptik ProgRes CF camera. APO-BrdU TUNNEL stained sections were imaged on a Leica Microstystems DMI 4000B microscope fitted with a Leica DFC360 FX camera. Fluorescent images were captured with filters set for nuclear staining with propidium iodide and for apoptotic nuclei staining with an Alexa Fluor 448 dye-labelled anti BrdU antibody. Relative tissue fluorescent staining intensities were measured from four separate sections of each tissue sample using Volocy software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Biofilm Dispersion Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilms were grown as described above for up to 7 days, and native dispersion was assessed as previously described (9 (link), 67 (link)). Briefly, biofilm microcolonies were observed by transmitted light using an Olympus BX60 microscope and a 20× UPlanF Olympus objective. Images were captured using a ProgRes CF camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany) and processed with ProgRes CapturePro 2.7.7 software. Dispersion efficiency was quantified by determining the percentage of microcolonies that had developed an interior void. For each biological replicate, biofilms were grown in 2 to 4 wells of a 24-well plate, and all microcolonies that had formed in these biofilms were analyzed for dispersion. The total number of microcolonies analyzed for each strain and condition are presented in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Generating Transgenic Sticklebacks via Tol2 Transposon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic sticklebacks were generated by microinjection of freshly fertilized eggs
as previously described (Chan et al., 2010 (link)).
Plasmids were co-injected with Tol2 transposase mRNA as described
(Fisher et al., 2006 (link); Wada et al., 2010 (link)). Mature
Tol2 mRNA was synthesized by in vitro transcription using the
mMessage mMachine SP6 kit (Life Technologies). All enhancer assays were performed on
high-plated fish derived from Little Campbell River (British Columbia), Bodega Bay
(California), or Rabbit Slough (Alaska). Microscopic observation for GFP expression
was conducted with a MZFLIII fluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn,
IL) using GFP2 filters and a ProgResCF camera (Jenoptik AG, Jena, Germany) to
distinguish GFP expression from autofluorescence in pigmented fish. We generated
stable lines by making crosses from mosaic founder animals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generating Transgenic Sticklebacks by Microinjection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transgenic sticklebacks were generated by microinjection of freshly fertilized eggs as previously described (Chan et al., 2010 (link)). Plasmids were co-injected with Tol2 transposase mRNA as described (Hosemann et al., 2004 (link)). Mature Tol2 mRNA was synthesized by in vitro transcription using the mMessage mMachine SP6 kit (Life Technologies). All enhancer assays were performed on pelvic-complete stickleback from Matadero Creek, California, USA (MATA). All larvae were raised under standard aquarium conditions to Swarup St 29/30 (Swarup, 1958 (link)), when pelvic bud development is initiated, for phenotyping. Larvae were anesthetized in 0.0003% w/v tricaine (Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate, Sigma). Microscopic observation for GFP expression was conducted with a MZFLIII fluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL) using GFP2 filters and a ProgResCF camera (Jenoptik AG, Jena, Germany) to distinguish GFP expression from autofluorescence in pigmented fish.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Stickleback Transgenesis with Tol2 and GFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microinjection of freshly fertilized Threespine Stickleback eggs with Tol2 transposase mRNA and GFP reporter constructs was performed as previously described (Chan et al. 2010 (link); Thompson et al. 2018 (link)). All resulting larvae were raised under standard aquarium conditions to Swarup stage 30 (Swarup 1958 ) and then euthanized in 600 mg/L tricaine, pH 7.5 for phenotyping. GFP expression was documented using a Leica MZFLIII fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems) fitted with a GFP2 filter and ProgResCF camera (Jenoptik AG). Only fish exhibiting bilateral green eyes (from background expression by the hsp70 minimal promoter of the expression construct, indicating extent of transgenesis) were phenotyped (Nagayoshi et al. 2008 (link)). The percomorph PelA constructs were assayed on lab-raised pelvic- and caudal-complete stickleback descended from fish collected at Rabbit Slough, Alaska, USA. The construct containing the Japanese Medaka ortholog of the Faf1 CONDEL candidate region was assayed on lab-raised pelvic- and caudal-complete Threespine Stickleback descended from fish collected at Matadero Creek, California, USA and at Little Campbell River, British Columbia, Canada. The experiment did not include blinding, but post hoc PCR confirmation of integrated plasmid identity was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Biofilm Architecture Analysis via CLSM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Architecture of biofilms grown in flow cells or in microtiter plates was assessed via confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). CSLM was carried out using a Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope. Prior to confocal microscopy, biofilms were stained using the BacLight LIVE/DEAD viability stain (Life Technologies) at a 1/1000 dilution in the growth medium. The CLSM images were processed using LAS AF software v2.4.1. Quantitative analysis of the images was performed using the COMSTAT96 (link). For brightfield visualization of biofilm architecture, the samples were viewed by transmitted light using an Olympus BX60 microscope and Olympus UPLNFLN 20× and 40× objectives. Images were captured using a ProgRes CF camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Thuringia) and processed using ProgRes CapturePro 2.7.7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Recombinant DNV Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MOS55 cells were infected with recombinant DNV sample corresponding to 5 × 108 of recombinant virus. For quantification of the viral DNA genome, the supernatant of infected cells was collected at indicated days after infection. EGFP expression in the cell line was observed using an Axiovert S100 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss) and images captured using a ProgRes CF camera (Jenoptik). EGFP signal was quantified by flow cytometry on a Cytomics FC500 (Beckman Coulter). Data were analyzed using BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software. Anopheles gambiae adults were intrathoracically injected according to Hughes et al. (2011)68 (link) with the indicated viral copy number of recombinant DNV virions. Fluorescence in mosquitoes and dissected tissues was monitored at indicated days post-injection using an Olympus BX-41 microscope. Images were processed using PictureFrame software (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of c-MYC and SMARCA4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conventional and fluorescence double-staining immunohistochemistry for c-MYC and SMARCA4 were done according to standard procedures using the rabbit monoclonal anti-c-MYC antibody ab32072 (clone Y69, abcam plc., Cambridge, UK in 1:100 at pH 6.0) and the mouse monoclonal anti-Brg1 (SMARCA4) antibody sc-17796 (G-7) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Heidelberg, Germany in 1:75 at pH 6.0). For conventional immunohistochemistry the secondary antibody Histofine® Simple Stain™ MAX PO (Multi) for simultaneous use with mouse and rabbit primary antibodies (medac GmbH, Wedel, Germany) was used. The secondary antibodies donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 488 (A21206) and donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor® 555 (A31570) (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for fluorescence double staining. The photographs were taken using Axiophot (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and mounted ProgRes CF camera (Jenoptik, Jena, Germany) or mounted SPOT RT Slider digital CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!