The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hargreaves apparatus

Manufactured by Stoelting

The Hargreaves apparatus is a laboratory instrument used for the measurement of thermal conductivity. It consists of a sample holder, a heating source, and temperature sensors to accurately determine the thermal properties of materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using hargreaves apparatus

1

Mechanical and Thermal Sensitivity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were habituated to the testing environment daily for at least two days before baseline testing. For testing mechanical sensitivity, animals were put in boxes on an elevated metal mesh floor and allowed 30 min for habituation before examination. The plantar surface of each hindpaw was stimulated with a series of von Frey hairs with logarithmically incrementing stiffness (Stoelting), presented perpendicular to the plantar surface (3–5 seconds for each hair). The 50% paw withdrawal threshold was determined using Dixon’s up-down method. Heat sensitivity was tested by radiant heat using Hargreaves apparatus (Stoelting) and the data were presented as paw withdrawal latency (PWL). The radiant heat intensity was adjusted so that basal PWL before inflammation is between 10–12 seconds, with a cut-off of 20 seconds to prevent tissue damage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nociceptive Heat Sensitivity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess nociceptive heat sensitivity, we used a conventional hot-plate test or a radiant heat paw withdrawal test (Hargreaves method). The temperature of the hot plate was adjusted to 42 or 52 ± 0.1°C. The latency to the first hind paw licking or withdrawal was taken as an index of nociceptive threshold. The cutoff time was set at 120 seconds at 42°C and 20 seconds at 52°C, to avoid damage to the paw. For the Hargreaves method, the mice were placed in clear Plexiglas boxes (22 × 19 × 14 cm) on a glass surface and allowed to habituate for 15 minutes before testing. A thermal stimulus was pointed at the plantar surface of each hind paw through the glass using a Hargreaves apparatus (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) until the animal lifted its paw away from the heat source. The latency to their paw withdrawal was automatically recorded with the apparatus to the nearest 0.1 seconds, and a cutoff latency of 20 seconds was used to avoid tissue damage. Three to 5 trials were conducted with at least 5 minutes between each trial. Mean values per paw were calculated and used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sciatic Nerve Cuff Injury Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surgery was done as described previously (Dimitrov et al., 2014 (link)). Briefly, the mice were anesthetized and the shaved skin of the upper left thigh was treated with antiseptic. A pair of small forceps was used to expose the main branch of the sciatic nerve and a 4 mm long piece of sterile polyethylene tubing or “cuff” (PE 90, i.d. 86 mm and o.d. 1.27 mm, Becton Dickinson Intramedic, Franklin Lakes, NJ), split lengthwise was placed onto the nerve. The surgical incision was closed with wound clips and analgesia with NSAID was given for the following three days. The sham mice underwent the same general anesthesia as the experimental mice. The upper thigh was shaved and a skin incision was made, but the sciatic nerve was only exposed and not exteriorized. The sham mice received the same pain treatment for three days after the surgery. The development of neuropathic pain was assessed by testing the mice for thermal hypersensitivity with the Hargreaves apparatus (Stoelting, Wood Dale, Il) and mechanical allodynia with von Frey filaments (North Coast Medical, Morgan Hill, CA) every tenth day from the fifth day to the end of the experiments, as described previously (Dimitrov et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!