The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Metal enhancer tablets

Manufactured by Merck Group

Metal enhancer tablets are designed to improve the performance and durability of metal components and equipment. The core function of these tablets is to enhance the physical and chemical properties of metals, such as strength, corrosion resistance, and surface finish. The product is intended for use in industrial and manufacturing settings, where maintaining the integrity of metal parts is crucial.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using metal enhancer tablets

1

Immunoblot Analysis of DING and PstS Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoblot analysis, 20 μg proteins per well was separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and electro-transferred to PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore). The protein was primed with either anti-DING antibodies at 1 : 1000 dilution or anti-PstS antibodies at 1 : 500 dilution. Anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) at 1 : 5000 dilution was used as secondary antibody. Detection was performed using 3,3' diaminobenzamidine hydrochloride (Sigma; DAB) with metal enhancer tablets (Sigma). The blots were quantitatively scanned using image j software. The antibodies used for DING and PstS protein identification have been previously described (Scott & Wu, 2005 (link); Zaborina et al., 2008 (link)). The antibodies did not show any cross reactivity toward the PstS or the DING protein (Supporting Information, Fig. S1). At least three biologic replicates in each group were used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of TFAM-Apex2 Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol was performed as previously described, with slight modifications (Hung et al., 2016 (link)). Vibratome sections of fly tissue were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in buffers containing 0.1 M sodium cacodylate with 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7. Residual glutaraldehyde was washed off (five washes for 2 min each) and quenched with 20 mM glycine followed by five more washes. The specimens were subsequently stained with SIGMA FAST™ DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) with Metal Enhancer Tablets (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min, washed in the buffer (10 min each, five times), and stained with 1% osmium tetroxide for 30 min. After washing with ddH2O (10 min each, three times), the specimens were stained with 1% uranyl acetate overnight. The specimens were then further dehydrated and embedded in resin for thin-sectioning and TEM observation.
TFAM-Apex2 staining signals were analyzed using Fiji ImageJ software. First, Gaussian Blur filters were applied to the TEM images, and then, the threshold was adjusted to isolate TFAM-Apex2 signals. The intensities and area of individual TFAM-nucleoids were plotted in box-and-whisker graphs. Statistical analyses were performed by the F-test and t-test functions in Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Antigenicity Evaluation of rgD5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To monitor the purification process and confirm rgD5 antigenicity prior to the ELISA development, SDS-PAGE was carried out on 12% polyacrylamide gel. The gels were either stained overnight with Coomassie Blue R-250 (Bio-Rad) or electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) using Bio-Rad Mini Trans-Blot Cell (Bio-Rad). Briefly, the membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk and, after three washes in phosphate buffer saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T) (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 100 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4), the membrane was incubated with mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) anti-6xHis HRP conjugated (Invitrogen) or with polyclonal antibody (PAb) anti-BoHV-5 from bovine experimentally immunized with inactivated BoHV-5 as previously described [22 (link)]. The immunoblot was developed using Sigma FAST 3,3’-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) with Metal Enhancer tablets (Sigma). The protein concentration was determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (Pierce) method according with the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblot Analysis of DING and PstS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoblot analysis, 20 µg proteins per well was separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and electro-transferred to PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore). The protein was primed with either anti-DING antibodies at 1:1000 dilution or anti-PstS antibodies at 1:500 dilution. Anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) at 1:5000 dilution was used as secondary antibody. Detection was performed using DAB with metal enhancer tablets (Sigma). The blots were quantitatively scanned by using Image J software. The antibodies used for DING and PstS protein identification have been previously described (Scott & Wu, 2005 (link); Zaborina et al., 2008 (link)). The antibodies did not show any cross reactivity towards the PstS or the DING protein (Supplemental Fig.S1). At least 3 biological replicates in each group were used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!