The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rq1 dnase 1

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States, France, Japan

RQ1 DNase I is a recombinant form of the enzyme deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) that catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of DNA. It is used to remove DNA contamination from RNA samples prior to downstream applications such as reverse transcription and PCR.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

59 protocols using rq1 dnase 1

1

Nuclear Run-On Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the NRO reaction, NRO reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl at pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 300 mM KCl, 50 µM ATP, GTP and Br-UTP, 2 µM CTP, 0.4 U/µL RNasin, and 2% sarkosyl) was prepared and preheated to 30°C for 5 min. An equal volume (100 µL) of NRO reaction buffer was mixed with 100 µL of thawed nuclei solution in freezing buffer and was incubated at 30°C for 5 min with mixing at 800 rpm on a thermomixer. Then, RQ1 DNaseI (Promega) was added along with DNaseI reaction buffer and samples were incubated at 37°C for 20 min with mixing at 800 rpm. To stop the NRO reaction, 225 µL NRO stop solution was added to the reaction and 25 µL of Proteinase K was added. The sample was incubated for 1 h at 55°C. Nuclear RNA was extracted with acidic phenol (Sigma) and then with chloroform (Sigma) and was precipitated and washed. RNA was then resuspended in 20 µL of nuclease-free water and subjected to base hydrolysis by addition of 5 µL of 1 N NaOH on ice for 10 min. The reaction was neutralized with 50 µL of 0.5 M Tris-Cl at pH 6.8. Then, RNA was purified through a Bio-Rad P-30 RNase-free spin column following the manufacturer's instructions and was treated with 7 µL of DNaseI buffer and 3 µL RQ1 DNaseI (Promega) for 10 min at 37°C and purified again with a Bio-Rad P-30 column.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Enterocytes mRNA Isolation and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enterocytes mRNAs were isolated using a RNeasy minikit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). Samples were treated with RQ1 DNase I and reverse transcription was perform using RQ1 DNase I according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega). Targeted genes were amplified with specific primer pairs listed in S3 Table, using a 7300 Applied Biosystems instrument under standard cycle conditions for PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher). Changes in gene expression levels were analyzed relative to the controls (uninfected samples), with GAPDH as a standard, using the ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Total RNA Extraction and RNA-Seq Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the PG-OVs of S. frugiperda using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity of RNA was determined with an ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Wilmington, DE, USA) and by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA libraries were constructed at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The total RNA was treated with DNase I (RQ1, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). mRNA was then isolated from 10 µg of total RNA using a Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen, MA, USA). Paired-end RNA-seq libraries were then prepared by following Illumina’s library construction protocol. The libraries were then sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform (Illumina, CA, USA) at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptomic Analysis of N. caudatum Fruit Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three important stages of N. caudatum fruits, early cotyledon development stage (52 DAF), fast oil accumulating stage (96 DAF) and fully maturation stage (146 DAF) from three individuals, were selected for RNA-seq analysis [2 ]. Total RNA of the fruits was extracted by using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA). DNase I (RQ1, Promega, USA) was added to remove any genomic DNA contamination. Total RNA was quantified using Nanodrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, USA). All the samples showed a 260/280 nm ratio of 1.8 to 2.1. The poly-A tailed mRNA was purified from the total RNA using Dynabeads™ mRNA Purification Kit (Cat # 61006,Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The first-strand cDNA fragments were synthesized with random primers and transformed into double-strand cDNA. Fragments of desirable lengths (200-300 bp) were purified, end-repaired and ligated with the sequencing adapters through A and T complementary base pairing. The sequencing library was constructed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The synthesized cDNA libraries were normalized to a 10 nM and gradually diluted and quantified to 4-5 pM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Aptamer-Quinine Binding Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotides (Table S1) were purchased from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium) and were purified by denaturing PAGE (Table 1). The secondary structures of aptamers were predicted by Predict1 (https://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructureWeb/Servers/Predict1/Predict1.html). Quinine sulphate monohydrate (QN) and xylene cyanol (XC) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co (Milwaukee, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from HyClone (Kremplstrasse, Austria). T4 DNA ligase, Phi29 DNA polymerase, dNTP, recombinant albumin was purchased from New England Biolabs (Evry, France). DNase I (RQ1) was purchased from Promega (Madison, USA), SYBR™Gold was purchased from Invitrogen (ThermoFisher, Bordeaux, France). Ethidium bromide (EB) was purchased from EurobioScientific (Les Ulis, France). ImageLab software (Bio-Rad, freeware) was used for band quantification. Equations used in this study are detailed in Supporting Information.

Dissociation constants and thermodynamic values determined by ITC analysis for the binding between the boxcar A or the NT0 and quinine in PBS (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2 at 15 °C, n = 2.

Table 1
AptamerKD (μM)ΔH(kcal/mol)−TΔS (kcal/mol)Binding sites N
A0.61 ± 0.07−12.6 ± 0.64.4 ± 0.71
NT00.53 ± 0.09−11.8 ± 0.93.5 ± 1.04
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of cesB Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcription of the ces gene cesB was analyzed by qRT-PCR as described previously (Dommel et al., 2011 (link)). In brief, RNA was isolated from frozen cell pellets via TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and bead beating. Phase separation was carried out with chloroform and nucleic acid was precipitated with 75% ethanol. Subsequently, DNA was digested with RQ1 DNAse I (Promega) and a total amount of 1 μg RNA was used for cDNA synthesis (cDNA qScript Supermix, Quanta Biosciences). qRT-PCR for each sample was performed in triplicates on a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler CFX96 Real-Time System (BioRad). In order to normalize and compare the relative expression the REST method was employed (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)), which has been shown previously to be a quite suitable tool for analysis of ces transcription (see, e.g., Lücking et al., 2009 (link), 2015 (link); Dommel et al., 2010 (link), 2011 (link); Frenzel et al., 2012 (link)). As internal calibrator, (with a relative expression value of 1.00) ces gene expression at an OD600 of 1.0 was chosen since it has been shown previously to be consistent throughout experiments (Dommel et al., 2011 (link)). Samples at OD600 of 1 and 10 were always taken from the same cultures. Sample to sample variation was corrected by using the 16S rDNA gene as a reference (rrn). Mean values and standard deviations were calculated from two independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PER2::LUC Organoid Circadian Rhythms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PER2::LUC organoids were plated into 12-well plates at the start of the experiment. Organoids for each time point were plated into a separate plate to limit manipulation or exposure to possible resetting cues. End of serum shock is indicated by circadian time 0 to compare with bioluminescent recordings performed in parallel. RNA was harvested every 4 hours over a 48-hour period using 0.25 ml/well of TRI Reagent™ RT (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). Suspensions were passed through a syringe needle several times to break up the Matrigel™ and organoids. Samples were immediately stored at −80°C until all time points were collected and could be processed. Total RNA was treated with RQ1 DNaseI (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). For reverse transcription reactions, 1 μg of total RNA was used with GoScript Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR was performed with SYBR Green Master Mix (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). qPCR results were detected by using the StepOnePlus System (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was purified according to TRI Reagent standard procedure (Sigma, USA), following digestion with RQ1 DNase I (Promega, USA) to remove contaminating genomic DNA. Afterward, 500 ng of DNA-free RNA was reverse transcribed using Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen, Germany) with oligo-dT primer. The RT reaction was performed at 42°C for 60 min. PCR mixtures contained 1 μL cDNA, 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), and 12.5 μL 2x Taq MasterMix (Qiagen, Germany) in a final volume of 25 μL. Specific sense and antisense primers, annealing temperatures, and number of repeating cycles for both studies are referred to in Table 1. Amplifying conditions were performed as follows: a first step of 95°C for 5 minutes, thereafter repeating cycles comprised of 95°C for 30 seconds, specific annealing temperature for 30 seconds and 72°C for 30 seconds, and a final extension step of 5 minutes at 72°C. PCR bands (8 μL of PCR product plus 2 μL of gel loading buffer) were resolved on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under ultraviolet light subsequent to being stained with ethidium bromide. PCR products were quantified using the Kodak ID 3.6 software package (Kodak Inc, USA). Beta-2 microglobulin was used as housekeeping gene for normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA concentration and quality were determined by UV spectrometry (NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and all samples were brought to a final concentration of 150 ng/μl. Total RNA (1.5 μg) was treated with RQ1 DNase I (M610; Promega) and subsequently assessed by conventional PCR for the complete absence of genomic DNA (gDNA). Subsequently, 1 μg of DNase-treated RNA was reversed transcribed using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (18064-014; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), with random hexamers (11034731001; Roche Diagnostics) as primers. Prior to qPCRs, cDNA samples were diluted 1:3 in water, except in the case of reactions against the 18S rRNA, for which samples were diluted 1:1,200 in water. qPCRs were performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 instrument. A typical qPCR mixture (10 μl) contained 13.5 ng of cDNA (32 pg when the qPCR was for 18S rRNA), a specific pair of primers (150 nM final concentration), and the SYBR premix Ex Taq (RR420A; TaKaRa). Primers used for qPCR are listed in Table 5. For all qPCRs, 40 cycles were performed using the following cycling conditions: denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 59°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 20 s. The relative expression ratio (rER) was calculated using the threshold cycle (2−ΔΔCT) method (42 (link)) using the expression level of the 18S rRNA as an internal reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Total RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 10 to 30 mg of tissue or from treated cells using 1 ml of TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Tissues in TRIzol Reagent were pre-homogenised at 30 Hz for 3 min using the homogeniser MM301 (Qiagen). RNA for each sample was treated with RQ1-DNaseI (Promega) and reversed-transcribed using Improm II Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) and random hexamer primers. For quantitative RT-PCR, 2 µl of single-stranded complementary DNA was mixed with TaqMan Universal PCR Master (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and assay-ondemand gene-specific products, using HPRT1 as the normalising gene (Integrated DNA Technology), and analysed on a ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (Life Technologies). The calculation of threshold cycle (C t ) values was performed using the SDS 2.2 software (Applied Biosystems), after automatically setting the baseline and the threshold. Data were analysed using the 2 ÀΔΔCt method, as previously described (24) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!