The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using k575x sputter coater

1

Bionic Coral Skeleton and Tissue Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were taken with a Zeiss Sigma 500 scanning electron microscope. Samples were prepared in two different ways. To image the bionic coral skeleton made of PEGDA, samples were dried at room temperature and sputter coated with iridium (Emitech K575X Sputter Coater). To image the bionic coral tissue made of GelMA, samples were snap frozen with liquid nitrogen, and were then lyophilized in a freeze dryer (Freezone, Labonco) for 3 days. The overall shape could not be maintained, but microscale structures (such as micropores of GelMA) were well preserved. The samples were sputter coated with iridium (Emitech K575X Sputter Coater) prior to imaging on the SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Feather Microstructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larger feather features such as feather shaft length, rachis width, and barb length were measured using calipers, optical micrographs, or rulers. Scanning electron microscopy was used to measure barbule spacing, which is at the micrometer scale. Both the Zeiss Sigma 500 scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the FEI SFEG UHR SEM from the Nano3 laboratory in Calit2 at University of California, San Diego were used. Samples placed in the FEI SEM were coated with a thin iridium layer using an Emitech K575X Sputter Coater. Accelerating voltages of 3 to 5 kV were used to image feather samples, which were secured to SEM stubs with conductive carbon tape. Dimensions of samples in SEM images were measured using the software ImageJ (NIH, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Aerogel Structure Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aerogels were cut with a metal blade and metalized by a sputter coater (EMITECH K575X Sputter Coater, Fall River, MA, USA). The metal employed for the metallization step was iridium to prevent the structure from being altered [37 (link)]. A scanning electron microscope (ESEM Scanning Electron Microscope QUANTA 200 FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to obtain micrographs of the porous structure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Material Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with an FEI Quanta 600. Infrared spectra were obtained using a JASCO FT/IR-680 Plus Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer. Raman scattering was performed on a Renishaw’s inVia Raman spectrometer using 514 nm laser source. The interferometric reflectance spectra were recorded using an AvaSpec-ULS3648 fiber optic spectrometer. EMITech K575X sputter coater was used to deposit 10 nm thick gold layer under vacuum at 30 mA for 1 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Monolithic Aerogel Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The monolithic aerogel samples were cut and metalized through an iridium sputter coater (EMITECH K575X Sputter Coater). Scanning electron micrographs were obtained by using an ESEM Scanning Electron Microscope (QUANTA 200 FEG, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
Composite samples were cut and metalized through a golden sputter coater and micrographs were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (FlexSEM 1000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and using a BackScattered Electron Detector (BSE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEM Analysis of Coated Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before and after the tests, scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was performed with a FEI-XL30 SEM at 20 kV. Prior to the examination, the samples had been coated with iridium under argon atmosphere for 6 seconds at 85 mA using a K575X sputter coater (Emitech, Houston, TX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Preparation of Cells for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare samples for SEM, we have used a protocol similar to31 with modifications. Briefly, the cells were collected by centrifugation (10 min, 500 rcf, Eppendorf centrifuge 5424R) from a 1.5 ml culture in microtubes and the supernatant was discarded. The cell pellet was re-suspended and fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer for at least 3 h or overnight at 7 °C. Cells were collected on a polycarbonate filter (Millipore, 25 mm diameter, 1 μm pore size, Whatman Nuclepore, WHA110610). The filters were washed twice in 0.1 M cacodylate, twice in 0.05 M cacodylate and eight times in MilliQ deionized water. Subsequently, the filters were dehydrated in a series of ethanol (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 95%, 100%) and then in hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), ethanol mixture (1:1 v/v) and twice in 100% HMDS. The filters were stored in a desiccator. Before imaging with SEM, samples were coated with Chromium to 15 nm thickness using K575X Sputter Coater [Emitech] to minimize charging effects while imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SEM Imaging of Lyophilized Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of lyophilized microparticles were prepared as follows: lyophilized microparticles stored at −20 °C were mechanically agitated until the product was freely moving powder. A small amount of power was placed on carbon tape affixed to an SEM stub, and excess powder was removed by blowing compressed air over the surface. Prepared stubs were sputter coated in an Emitech K575X Sputter Coater under argon at 4 × 10−3 mbar using iridium deposited using 85 mA of current for 8 s. Coated samples were then loaded into the scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta FEG 250) and imaged using a 3 kV beam in high vacuum. Images were taken after repeated rounds of focusing and direct adjustments were performed to ensure image quality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy of Mock-infected VLC Inserts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mock-infected VLC inserts were fixed for scanning electron microscopy technique as previously described (Escaffre et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, inserts were fixed for 72 h in 2.5% formaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (0.01% trinitrophenol, 0.03% CaCl2, pH 7.2). Samples were then washed, dehydrated in ethanol, and processed through hexamethyldisilazane. After being air-dried filters were detached, mounted onto the specimen stubs and sputter-coated with iridium in Emitech K575x sputter coater (Ashford, Kent, England) at 20 mA for 20 s. Other inserts were also similarly processed until the washing step for transmission electron microscopy purpose. Samples were then incubated in 2% aqueous uranylacetate, dehydrated, infiltrated with Poly/Bed 812 prior embedding into polyethylene capsules for polymerization and sample sectioning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Xylan-Alginate Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe the surface and cross-section microstructure of the xylan–alginate films. The films were cut into 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm strips, before being placed onto a stub holder using carbon tape, and were sputter-coated with gold using an Emitech K575x sputter coater. The cross-section of the films was taken by fracturing the films, which were dried overnight in an oven at 105 °C. The images were taken using a JOEL JSM-7001F at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!