The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Salmonella enterica

Sourced in United States, China

Salmonella enterica is a bacterial strain commonly used in laboratory settings. It serves as a model organism for research purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using salmonella enterica

1

Antimicrobial Activity of Polysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
KGO and KGM were purchased from Xi’an Quanao Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Xi’an, Shaanxi, China). KA was obtained from Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chitosan (CTS) and chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) were purchased from Qingdao Maidier Bioengineering Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, Shandong, China). Hyaluronic acid (HA) was purchased from Qufu Shengjiade Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Qufu, Shandong, China). The remaining reagents are all commercially available in analytical grades and were used without further purification. The microorganisms were provided by Qingdao Entry–Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, China. Strain number: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Salmonella enterica (CGMCC 1.16091), Shewanella putrefaciens (CICC 22940), Escherichia coli (ATCC 51755), and Salmonella enterica (ATCC 25241).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microbial Growth Protocols for Antibacterial and Antifungal Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacterial and fungal strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and from the microbiology laboratory of the University of Québec in Trois-Rivières (UQTR). The microorganisms used were Escherichia coli (ATCC 35218), Salmonella enterica (ATCC 10708), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Aspergillus niger (ATCC 10535), Candida albicans (from UQTR microbiology laboratory), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (from UQTR microbiology laboratory). The bacterial strains were grown on sterilized Mueller Hinton agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, while the fungal strains were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Peptide Evaluation Against Pathogenic Bacteria and Candida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following pathogenic bacterial strains were used: The Gram-positive Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Staphylococcus aureus (HNCMO112011), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19111) and the Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), Salmonella enterica (ATCC 13076), Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCTC 13440), Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC 17978) obtained from the ATCC (United States) and NCTC (National Collection of Type Cultures–England). For the antifungal experiment the Candida albicans W01 strain (Ördögh et al., 2014 (link)) was used. Antimicrobial activities of peptides against ∼107 log phase bacteria were tested in Potassium-Phosphate Buffer (PPB, pH 7.4) as described by Jenei et al. (2020) (link) while anti-Candida assays were done according to Szerencsés et al. (2021) (link). The two-fold dilution series of peptides ranged from 25 μM to 0.125 μM, while that of the antibiotics ampicillin (Merck) and miconazole (Duchefa Biochemie) from 10.24 mM to 0.1 μM. The lowest concentration of the antimicrobial agents, which completely eliminated viable bacteria or C. albicans were considered as the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) and minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial DNA Extraction and Specificity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted DNA from the strains Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 (700926), Bacillus cereus str. Frankland and Frankland (10876), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (17802D-5), and Clostridioides difficile (9689D-5) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA). The additional bacteria and their sources used in specificity testing included Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus thuringiensis, Citrobacter freudii, Enterobacter aerogenes, E. coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella oxytoca, Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus luteus, Salmonella enterica, Serratia macrescens, Shigella flexneri, Staphylococcus capitis, and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, as listed in Table 1. B. cereus and E. coli bacterial cultures were also obtained from the Carolina Biological Supply Company (Burlington, NC, USA). E. coli and B. cereus were inoculated in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium and grown at 37 °C. A hemocytometer and a compound light microscope were used to obtain cell counts. Human HL-60 DNA was also tested in the specificity studies and was obtained from ATCC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight clinical isolates were tested in this study, among which MRSA (Malaysian Type Culture Collection MTCC 381123), Bacillus cereus (MTCC 131621) and Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 49399) were Gram-positive; while, Escherichia coli K1 (MTCC 710859), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (American Type Culture Collection ATCC 10145), Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC 13883), Salmonella enterica (ATCC 14028) and Serratia marcescens (ATCC 13880) were Gram-negative. All the strains were resistant to two or more antibiotics (Table 1). A 24 h old bacterial broth culture was used for experiments as previously described (Khan et al. 2008 (link)).

Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacteria used in this study

Bacteria/ID noAntibiotic susceptibility profile
amx 25 µgamc 20/10 µgcip 10 µgcst 10 µgenr 5 µggen 10 µglcn 15 µgnxn 10 µgtcn 30 µgsxt 1.25 + 23.75 µg
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus MTCC 381123RRRRRSSRSR
E. coli K1 MTCC 710859RRSSSSRRSS
S. pyogenes ATCC 49399RRSRSSRSSI
B. cereus MTCC 131621RRSRRSSSSS
P. aeruginosa ATCC 10145RRSRRSRSRR
K. pneumonia ATCC 13883RSSSRSRSRS
S. enterica ATCC 14028SSSSSRRSIS
S. marcescens ATCC 13880RRSRSSRSSS
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Activities of Botanical Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibacterial and antifungal activities of the extracts were determined according to methods described in detail by Pires et al. (2018) [35 (link)] and Heleno et al. (2013) [46 (link)], respectively. Five Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacter cloacae—ATCC 49741, Escherichia coli—ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa—ATCC 9027, Salmonella enterica—ATCC 13076, and Yersinia enterocolitica—ATCC 8610) and three Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus—ATCC 11778, Listeria monocytogenes—ATCC 19111 and Staphylococcus aureus—ATCC 25923), besides two fungi strains (Aspergillus fumigatus—ATCC 204305 and Aspergillus brasiliensis—ATCC 16404) purchased from Frilabo (Porto, Portugal) were used. All work was performed with sterile materials handled under laminar flow. Prior to the assays, microorganisms were incubated (37 °C ± 0.5 °C for 24 h for bacteria and 25 °C ± 0.5 °C for 72 h for fungi) with appropriate media for each strain to reach a state of exponential growth. Negative controls of the extract and culture medium were prepared, and the antibiotics streptomycin, methicillin, ampicillin and antifungal ketoconazole served as positive controls. The antimicrobial potential was assessed as the minimum concentration required to inhibit the microorganism growth (MIB) and to cause bacteria or fungi death (MBC or MFC, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Specificity Testing of RPAC Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RPAC
assay was tested for specificity against a number of other organisms
that present similarly in the clinic. Purified nucleic acids prepared
from cultures of Clostridium difficile, Salmonella
enterica
, Giardia intestinalis, and Blastocystis hominis were purchased from ATCC (Manassas,
VA). DNA was also extracted from a stool sample that tested positive
for Fasciola by PCR and microscopy. A volume of 10
μL of DNA (100 ng DNA per μL) from each extraction was
used as a template in an RPA reaction with the lateral flow RPAC assay.
A positive control containing DNA extracted from 106Cryptosporidium oocysts/mL PBS (8.4 ng DNA per μL)
and a negative control containing no template DNA were also tested.
DNA extractions from non-Cryptosporidium organisms
contained an excess concentration of DNA to ensure that RPAC assay
negativity was not due to lack of DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ampicillin (APC) and vancomycin (VAN) were purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) medium was ordered from Hope Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Qingdao, China). Pepsin, papain, and trypsin were all sourced from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Escherichia coli CMCC44102, Escherichia coli CMCC 44817, Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Escherichia coli CMCC 44102, Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Salmonella enterica CMCC 50335, Shigella flexneri CMCC 51571, Shigella sonnei CMCC 51592, Shigalla dysenteria CMCC 51252, Shigella flexneri CMCC 51572, Bacillus cereus CMCC 63301, Bacillus pumilus CMCC 63202, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Staphylococcus aureus CMCC 26003, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, MRSA N315, and MRSA ATCC 43300 were provided by University of Science and Technology of China. Caco-2 cells were obtained from BeNa Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibacterial Evaluation of Crystal Sample

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibacterial activities of the crystal sample were tested against Gram+ and Gram bacterial strains. Bacteria used were Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Salmonella enterica (ATCC 43972), Micrococcus luteus (ATCC 4698), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 43251), Enterobacter aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 49189).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bacterial Cultures for Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC BAA-2341), Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 19111), Salmonella enterica (ATCC 13076), and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) were obtained from LGC Standards (Teddington, GB) in the form of a spore suspension. Before their use in the experiments, the suspensions were defrosted and washed with distilled water to remove glycerol. The bacteria strains were cultured in nutrient media: tryptic soy agar (TSA) for S. aureus and S. enterica, and brain heart agar (BHA) for L. monocytogenes and E. cloacae. Before each experiment, the bacteria’s suspension in distilled buffer saline was prepared according to the appropriate density in the McFarland scale [26 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!