The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti f4 80

1

Histological Analysis of Islet Grafts in Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Livers containing islet grafts were procured from recipient mice, fixed in 10% formalin neutral buffer solution, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5 μm-thick sections. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was preformed according to standard protocols. Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously reported.25 (link) Sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: antiinsulin (1:2000; Proteintech, Tokyo, Japan), anti-CD4 (1:100; D7D2Z, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD8α (1:400; D4W2Z, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CD31 (1:100; Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-F4/80 (1:50; Novus Biologicals), followed by incubation for 40 min with a biotinylated secondary antibody diluted 1:300 in PBS. Sections were washed with PBS before addition of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (1:100 in biotinylated secondary antibody; ABC-Elite, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 50 min. After washing in PBS, the color reaction was carried out using diaminobenzidine and nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. The number of positively stained lymphocytes that had infiltrated into the islet grafts was counted in all lobes of the liver (at the maximum cross section, which contained about 10 islets in total). The areas of liver sections that stained positively for insulin were measured and analyzed using NIH Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive histological analysis of tumor tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissue samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 12–24 hours at room temperature. Fixed samples were embedded in paraffin blocks, and 5 μm sections were cut. H&E and all IHC staining procedures were performed by TPSR core at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. H&E staining was used for routine morphological analysis. To study ECM elements, we performed Picrosirius red staining and IHC staining for laminin (DAKO), fibronectin (Abcam) and elastin (Abcam). Macrophages, neutrophils, endothelial cells, and proliferating cells were detected using anti-F4/80 (Novus Biologicals LLC), anti-Ly6G (Abcam), anti-CD31 (Dianova), and anti-Ki67 (Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies, respectively. Fluorescent staining was performed with anti-aSMA (Abcam) with secondary anti-mouse Alexa Flour 488, pSMAD3 (Abcam) with secondary anti-rabbit-Biotin and Streptaviden Alexa Flour 647, F4/80 (Novus Biologicals LLC) with anti-rat Alexa Flour 750, CD73 (R&D System) with anti-sheep Alexa Flour 568. Pictures were taken on Keyence BZ-X710. Whole image scanning was performed on Apiro Versa 200 (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Spinal Cord Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were sacrificed on day 14 p.i. by transcardial perfusion with saline followed by 4% PF/PBS. The SCs were dissected, post-fixed in 4% PF/PBS, cryoprotected in 27% sucrose/PBS, embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, frozen in a dry ice-ethanol slurry, and stored at − 80 °C. Thirty-micrometer-thick horizontal cryostat sections were obtained from both groups and thaw-mounted on the same slide.
Spinal cord sections were blocked with 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4 containing 10% NGS and 0.5% Triton X-100, for 1 h at RT. Subsequently, they were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-F4/80 (Novus Biologicals; 1:500 dilution), anti-Arg1 (MilliporeSigma; 1:500 dilution), and iNOS (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA; 1:100 dilution) antibodies. Thereafter, the sections were rinsed with PBS and incubated with the corresponding Alexa Fluor 488- or Alexa Fluor 594-tagged secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at RT. Slides were coverslipped with ProLong Diamond antifade mountant with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Breast Cancer Cell Phagocytosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Breast cancer cells were labelled with 5‐μM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and incubated for 15 minutes at 37°C in a CO2 incubator protected from light according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). Macrophages were incubated in serum‐free medium for 2 hours before adding 2 × 105 CFSE‐labelled breast cancer cells. After coculture at 37°C for 2 hours, cells were harvested, macrophages were stained with APC‐labelled anti‐F4/80 (Novus Biologicals), and phagocytosis were measured and analysed. Phagocytosis was calculated as the percentage of F4/80 + CFSE+ cells among CSFE + cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating ERK1/2 Signaling in Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monoclonal anti-ERK1/2 and anti-pERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA); anti-F4/80 from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, USA); anti-CD31, anti-VEGF-R2, anti-Bad from BD Pharmingen (San Jose, CA, USA); anti-β-tubulin from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); recombinant Protein G-HRP conjugate from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). AOPCP (adenosine 5’-alpha,beta-methylene diphosphate), A3AR agonist IB-MECA (N6-(3-Iodobenzyl)adenosine-5′-N-methyluronamide, 1-Deoxy-1-[6-[((3-Iodophenyl)methyl)amino]-9H-purin-9-yl]-N-methyl-β-D-ribofuranuronamide), A2AAR agonist CGS-21680 (2-p-(2-Carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride hydrate), A1AR agonist CCPA (2-Chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine) and cell culture reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!