The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using dragen pipeline

1

SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNA was extracted from 180 μl of each saliva sample using the QIAamp 96 Viral RNA Kit with the QIAcube HT (Qiagen) using the following settings with a filter plate: the lysed sample was premixed eight times before subjecting to vacuum for 5 min at 25 kP and vacuum for 3 min at 70 kPa. Following three washes using the same vacuum conditions above, the samples were eluted in 100 μl AVE buffer followed by a final vacuum for 6 min at 60 kPa. Nine microliters of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis and library preparation using the COVIDSeq Test kit (Illumina) and Mosquito HV Genomics Liquid Handler (SPT Labtech Inc.). The size and purity of the library were determined using the 4200 TapeStation System (Agilent) and the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Constructed libraries were pooled and sequenced using the NovaSeq. 6000 Sequencing System SP Reagent Kit and the NovaSeq Xp 2‐Lane Kit. Illumina's DRAGEN pipeline was used to derive sample consensus sequences, which were filtered based on a minimum of 70% coverage of the genome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exome Sequencing Utilizing DRAGEN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exome sequencing was performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments (CLIA)-certified environment (GeneDx, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Analysis was performed using the DRAGEN pipeline (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Copy number variants (CNVs) were called using the DRAGEN CNV pipeline and a normalized segmented depth of coverage model, as previously described (Rockowitz et al. 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Variant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
800–1000 ng of genomic DNA of each individual was fragmented to an average length of 350 bp. Library preparation was performed using the TruSeq DNA PCR-free kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole-genome sequences were obtained as 150 bp paired-end reads on S4 flow cells using the NovaSeq6000 system (Illumina). The intended average sequencing depth was 30X. The DRAGEN pipeline (Illumina, version 3.6.3 or 3.5.7) was used for alignment and joint variant calling was performed with the Glnexus software (version 1.3.2). Individuals with a 20-fold coverage in less than 96% of the protein-coding sequence were removed as well as related individuals to retain only from related pairs. Variant QC was performed using hail (version 0.2.58). European individuals were selected by performing PCA analysis along with the 1000 genomes data. Finally, annotation was performed using Variant Effect Predictor (VEP, version 101). In the present study, only individuals from the BoSCO and CoMRI substudies were included.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing for Clinical Use

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical rapid whole genome sequencing (rWGS) of the proband was performed at the Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine in San Diego (CA) (Kingsmore et al., 2022 (link)). Sequence via next‐generation sequencing (NGS) technology was generated from genomic DNA. PCR‐free library preparation was performed prior to rWGS. An average genomic coverage of at least 35x, and/or at least 90% of OMIM genes were achieved 100% of coding base coverage of >10x for each proband. Alignment and variant calling were performed with the Illumina DRAGEN pipeline using the official reference build 37.1 (hg19). CNV calling was performed using a combination of CNV callers. Interpretation of CNVs was focused on variants that overlap or have a boundary that lies within 1 kb of an exon in all coding genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Analysis of 100k Genomes Project

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected from a subset of 100,000 Genomes Project probands in PaxGene tubes to preserve RNA at the time of recruitment. RNA was extracted, depleted of globin and ribosomal RNAs, and subjected to sequencing by Illumina using 100 bp paired-end reads, with a mean of 102M mapped reads per individual. Alignment was performed using Illumina’s DRAGEN pipeline. FRASER226 (link) and OUTRIDER25 (link) were used to detect abnormal splicing events and expression differences with samples run in batches of 500, both run via the DROP pipeline39 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Exome Sequencing of EDTA Blood Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were collected from subjects in EDTA vacutainers and after collection were immediately stored at − 80 °C. Standard DNA preparation was performed using DNeasy Blood kits (Qiagen, MD, USA). Whole-exome sequencing libraries were generated using the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon Kit V5 (Agilent, CA, USA) and sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 instrument (Illumina, CA, USA) using standard paired-end sequencing protocol. Raw sequencing reads were stored as FASTQ files and then aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh37) using Illumina’s Dynamic Read Analysis for GENomics (DRAGEN) Pipeline. Resultant BAM files were position-sorted and duplicate reads marked. Single-sample gVCF files were generated by the DRAGEN Germline Pipeline, and joint calling of all samples in the study cohort were performed by DRAGEN Joint Genotyping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exome Sequencing Utilizing DRAGEN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exome sequencing was performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments (CLIA)-certified environment (GeneDx, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Analysis was performed using the DRAGEN pipeline (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Copy number variants (CNVs) were called using the DRAGEN CNV pipeline and a normalized segmented depth of coverage model, as previously described (Rockowitz et al. 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Sequencing from Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral RNA from viral transport medium, nasopharyngeal swabs, or saliva was extracted for each sample and used in complementary DNA synthesis as described in the Supplementary Methods. Viral DNA library preparation for next-generation sequencing was performed using the COVIDSeq Test kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and Mosquito HV Genomics Liquid Handler (SPT Labtech Inc., Boston MA). Constructed libraries were pooled and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing platform. Illumina’s DRAGEN pipeline was used to derive sample consensus sequences, which were filtered based on a minimum of 70% coverage of the genome and 20X sequencing depth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptome Analysis of 100,000 Genomes Project

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood was collected from a subset of 100,000 Genomes Project probands in PaxGene tubes to preserve RNA at the time of recruitment. RNA was extracted, depleted of globin and ribosomal RNAs, and subjected to sequencing by Illumina using 100bp paired-end reads, with a mean of 102M mapped reads per individual. Alignment was performed using Illumina’s DRAGEN pipeline. IGV(48 (link)) was used to inspect sequencing reads and generate Sashimi plots to show splicing junctions supported by 5 or more reads in areas of interest.
FRASER2(49 (link)) and OUTRIDER(50 (link)) were used to detect abnormal splicing events and expression differences with 499 samples used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!