The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using vetmax plus qpcr master mix

1

Comparative Brucella Detection Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The developed ITS PCR assay was compared to the BCSP31 PCR assay for diagnostic validation because the BCSP31 gene target is one of the most commonly used targets used for the detection of Brucella spp. in animals [30 (link)] and is routinely used by OIE reference laboratories. The BCSP31 PCR can be used in a real-time PCR format, and the primers and probe for the Brucella spp. described by Probert et al. [16 (link)] was used in our study. This assay was used on a different platform (StepOne real-time PCR machine, Applied Biosystems™, Foster City, CA, USA) and the VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix (as described in 2.4, but with 300 nM forward and reverse primer concentrations and 100 nM probe concentration in the final reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Real-Time PCR for M. hyopneumoniae Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A commercial real time M. hyopneumoniae PCR (rt-PCR) was performed in laryngeal swabs, BALF and lung tissue samples. The assay was performed using VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) and VetMAX™ M. hyopneumoniae Reagents (Applied Biosystems, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix kit includes Xeno™ DNA Control, which serves as an internal positive control for DNA purification and rt-PCR. Runs were carried out in an ABIPRISM® 7500 machine (Applied Biosystems, Singapore). The threshold for the DNA target was set at 10% of the average maximum fluorescence value of the positive control DNA target. Cycle threshold (Ct) values equal to or lower than 40 were considered positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Porcine Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six cross-bred pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) of either sex, aged 6–18 months old, were used as blood donors for in vitro experiments. Pigs were housed at the Experimental Station of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale (IZS) of Sardinia (“Surigheddu”, Sassari, Italy). Animal husbandry, handling, and procedures (bleeding) were carried out according to the Italian Legislative Decree No. 26 dated 4 March 2014 and in agreement with the Guide of Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization No. 1232/2020-PR).
Heparinized blood samples were used for generation of monocyte-derived macrophages (moMΦ) (described in Section 4.2). Animal health was routinely monitored by trained veterinarians, and blood samples were screened for several porcine pathogens. The absence of African swine fever (ASFV), porcine parvovirus (PPV), and porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2) genome was evaluated though qualitative real-time PCR, as previously described [21 (link),60 (link)], with primers reported in the Table S1 [61 (link),62 (link),63 (link)]. The absence of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae was monitored using commercial real-time PCR kits (LSI VetMAX™ PRRSV EU/NA and VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix, both Thermo Fisher Scientific, respectively), following the manufacturer’s instructions [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Porcine Macrophage Generation from Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five cross-bred pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus), either male or female, 6–18 months old, were used to donate blood for macrophage generation. Animals were kept at the Experimental Station of Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale (IZS) of Sardinia (Sassari, Italy). Animal husbandry, handling, and procedures (bleeding) were performed in accordance to the Italian Legislative Decree n.26 dated 4th of March 2014, as well as the Guide of Use of Laboratory Animals issued by the Italian Ministry of Health (authorization n° 1232/2020-PR). Animal health status was controlled by authorized veterinarians, and samples (EDTA blood) were routinely screened for main porcine pathogens, as previously described (22 (link)). In detail, qualitative real-time PCR was employed to exclude the presence of porcine parvovirus (PPV), porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2), and African swine fever (ASFV) genome (22 (link), 23 (link)), with primers reported in the Table S1 (24 (link)–26 (link)), whereas commercial real-time PCR kits were used to detect porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae genome (LSI VetMAX™ PRRSV EU/NA and VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix, both Thermo Fisher Scientific, respectively) (22 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimizing Robust DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optimized protocol was evaluated for the robustness by deliberate modifications in the conditions (changing elution temperature and time, number of washing steps) and reagent concentrations (DTT concentration, different master mix). The effect of elution temperature and time was evaluated at three different temperature (80 °C, 90 °C and 98 °C) and at three different time interval (15 min, 30 min and 45 min). The effect of DTT concentration was evaluated by treating the semen spotted cards with different volumes of 0.1 M DTT (0, 0.1 μL, 1 μL, 2.5 μL, 5 μL). Further, four commercially available master mix {PREMIX EX TAQ™ (Probe qPCR), (TAKARA); Kappa Probe Fast Universal qpcr kit (KAPPA); VETMAX™PLUS qpcr master mix (thermo fisher) and TAQMAN® Universal PCR master mix (ABI)} were evaluated for their effectiveness in the real-time PCR reaction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiplex Pathogen Screening in Swine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleic acids were extracted from moMΦ using a MagMax Core kit and MagMax96 extractor (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; samples were kept at −20 °C until analyzed. The presence of PRRSV or M. hyopneumoniae genome was subsequently screened using commercial real-time PCR kits, LSI VetMAX™ PRRSV EU/NA and VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix (both Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. The presence of PCV2 was instead evaluated by qualitative real-time PCR, as we previously described [44 (link)], using forward primer 5′-TGGCCCGCAGTATTCTGATT-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CAGCTGGGACAGCAGTTGAG-3′ [45 (link)]. Samples with Ct values less than 40 were considered positive [44 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

qPCR Amplification of Purified DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for DNA amplification. The PCR amplification mixture comprised 12.5 µL 2× qPCR Master Mix, 400 nM (final concentration) forward/reverse primers, 150 nM (final concentration) probe, 1 µL VetMAX™ Xeno™ Internal Positive Control-VIC™ Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2 µL template DNA, and nuclease-free water to make up a total volume of 25 µL per reaction.
Detection and amplification of purified DNA by qPCR was performed on the StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System running StepOne Software v2.3 system (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The cycling conditions recommended by the manufacturer of the PCR reagents were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Screening of Healthy Pigs for Viral Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seven cross-bred pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) of either sex, aged 6–18 months old, were used as blood donors in this study. Animals were housed at the Experiment Station of the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale (IZS) of Sardinia (Surigheddu, Sassari, Italy) and their health status was routinely monitored by trained veterinarians. Pigs were screened for ASFV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine parvovirus (PPV), porcine circovirus 2 (PCV2), and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae using commercial real-time PCR kits (LSI VetMAX™ PRRSV EU/NA and VetMAX™-Plus qPCR Master Mix, both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) or qualitative real-time PCR as previously described [23 (link),24 (link)], with primers reported in the Supplementary Table S1 [25 (link),26 (link),27 (link)]. Animal handling and experimental procedures (bleeding) were approved by the local ethics committee and were authorized by the Ministry of Health (authorization n° 1232/2020-PR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!