The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quadscan 4000

Manufactured by Bodystat
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Quadscan 4000 is a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device designed for body composition analysis. It measures impedance at multiple frequencies to assess the electrical properties of the body, which can be used to estimate parameters such as body fat, lean body mass, and total body water.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

76 protocols using quadscan 4000

1

Evaluating Nutritional Status and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From measured body height and body weight, BMI, kg/m2 was calculated for all patients. Waist circumference, available in 400 patients, was measured in standing position with a measuring tape at the smallest part between the lowest rib and hip. After multifrequency bio‐electrical impedance analysis (50 kHz, Bodystat Quadscan 4000), free fat mass (FFM; kg) was calculated using the Kyle formula, and FM (kg) was calculated by subtracting FFM from total body weight.22 Subsequently, FFM was divided by squared body height to calculate FFMI (kg/m2). Data on FM and FFMI were available for 346 patients. Nutritional status was evaluated in 267 patients using the validated MNA that has a maximum score of 30 points with higher scores indicating a better nutritional status.23, 24 If necessary, study partners assisted patients in completing this questionnaire. Patients scoring lower than 23.5 points are generally regarded as being at risk of malnutrition and lower than 17 points as malnourished. For the analyses, a modified MNA score was used with a maximum score of 28, in which the question on neuropsychological functioning was omitted to avoid that putative group differences in MNA were driven by diagnosis.25
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anthropometric and Body Composition in IBD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At baseline, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients with IBD, including age, gender, physical activity, disease duration, weight, height, and measures of both fat and lean body mass. Anthropometric and body composition data were obtained during a morning examination while patients were in a fasting state. Body weight was measured using an electronic platform scale (Life Measurement Instruments, Concord, CA, USA), with patients wearing light clothing and no shoes. Body height was measured using a stadiometer (Sanny; American Medical do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil), with patients standing barefoot, heels together, spine erect, and arms extended next to the body. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2) and classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition [33 ] as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), or obese (>30 kg/m2). Fat and lean body masses were measured using a bioelectric impedance device (QuadScan4000; Bodystat, Douglas, Isle of Man, British Isles), with the subject fasting, after urination and without jewelry or wristwatches beforehand. Patients with IBD were monitored for six months to evaluate routine clinical parameters and monitor for disease relapse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Body Composition Measurement Using BIA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body fat (%) and fat mass (kg) were measured using multi-frequency bio-impedance analysis (BodyStat Quadscan 4000, Isle of Man, UK), which has previously been validated against deuterium oxide dilution in children [26 (link)]. Following at least 5 min supine rest, participants were studied in the supine position on a non-conductive surface, with arms and legs abducted at a 30–45° angle from the trunk to avoid medial body contact by upper and lower extremities. The instrument was calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, and measurements were conducted according to standardized procedures [27 (link)]. Two electrodes were placed on the right foot, under 4th/5th toes and proximal end of foot, and two electrodes on the right hand, under 4th/5th fingers and below head of ulna. FMI was calculated by dividing fat mass (kg) by height squared (m2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Body Composition Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body mass index (BMI), also known as the Quetelet Index, was calculated by dividing the measured body weight by the squared measured height (kg/m2). Participants were classified as: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2), or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). All circumferences (cm) were measured with a measuring tape in standing position: arm at the mid-upper left arm hanging loosely by the side, calf at the broadest point, waist at the smallest part between the lowest rib and the hip, and the hip at the broadest part [24 ]. Fat-free mass (FFM, kg) was estimated using multi-frequency bio-electrical impedance analysis (Bodystat Quadscan 4000) and the formula of Kyle [25 (link)]. The availability for body composition parameters ranged from 78% for FFM to 100% for BMI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for Lean Body Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lean body mass was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) (BodyStat Quadscan4000). It is appreciated that in vivo measurements cannot measure body composition directly, but rather make predictions from other physiological metrics. BIA was chosen because of its speed, simplicity, high precision and suitability for assessing short‐term changes in individuals (Johnson, Bolonchuk, & Lykken, 1985; Roubenoff, 1996; Wells & Fewtrell, 2006). In order to avoid the inherent problems of predicting total body water (TBW), regression equations for converting between impedance and TBW were avoided. Instead, the simple index of 1/impedance, which reliably predicts lean mass index (lean mass/height2), was used (Wells et al., 2007).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Bio-Clinical Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collection of bio-clinical features including phenomics, biochemical variables and information on dietary and smoking habits has been reported [13 (link), 14 (link)]. Body weight, height, sagittal abdominal diameter and blood pressure (after 15 min rest) were measured. Body composition was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (QuadScan 4000, Bodystat Inc., Isle of Man, UK) and fat-free mass was calculated by subtracting fat mass from body weight. Intestinal transit time was assessed by abdominal X-ray after participants ingested nonabsorbable radio-opaque transit markers, and calculated based on the number of visible markers on the obtained abdominal X radiographs, adjusted for time since last marker ingestion [16 (link), 17 (link)]. Dietary intake of macronutrients was assessed from a validated four-day pre-coded dietary record [18 (link)]. Stool consistency was self-assessed according to a seven-point Bristol stool scale [19 (link)]. Smoking habits were categorized as current smoker or non-smoker.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bioimpedance Analysis for Muscle Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To estimate ASMM, we measured bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) resistance using a multifrequency bioelectrical impedance device (Quadscan 4,000, Bodystat, Douglas, United Kingdom), as described previously.18 We used BIA to distinguish between water, fat, and lean body mass to assess body composition. ASMM was estimated from the equation described by Kyle et al.24:
ASMM (kg) = −4.211 + (0.267 × height (cm)2/resistance(U)) + (0.095 × weight (kg)) + (1.909 × sex (men = 1;women = 0)) + (−0.012 × age (years)) + (0.058 × reactance(U)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Anthropometric and Body Composition in IBD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At baseline, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients with IBD, including age, gender, physical activity, disease duration, weight, height, and measures of both fat and lean body mass. Anthropometric and body composition data were obtained during a morning examination while patients were in a fasting state. Body weight was measured using an electronic platform scale (Life Measurement Instruments, Concord, CA, USA), with patients wearing light clothing and no shoes. Body height was measured using a stadiometer (Sanny; American Medical do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil), with patients standing barefoot, heels together, spine erect, and arms extended next to the body. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2) and classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition [33 ] as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), or obese (>30 kg/m2). Fat and lean body masses were measured using a bioelectric impedance device (QuadScan4000; Bodystat, Douglas, Isle of Man, British Isles), with the subject fasting, after urination and without jewelry or wristwatches beforehand. Patients with IBD were monitored for six months to evaluate routine clinical parameters and monitor for disease relapse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nutritional Assessment and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive characteristics included the following: age, sex, BMI from measured weight and height (kg/m2), level of education, and living situation (with partner/children, alone). Level of education was assessed using the Verhage classification system [29 (link)] and categorized into low (scores 1–3), intermediate (scores 4 and 5), and high (scores 6 and 7). Fat-free mass (FFM, kg) was estimated using bio-electrical impedance analysis (Bodystat Quadscan 4000) and the formula of Kyle [30 (link)] and available of 195 participants. Furthermore, nutritional status was evaluated with the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) [3 ]. To avoid that differences in MNA score were driven by differences in cognitive performance, we excluded the item on neuropsychological problems. MNA score range from 0 to 28 with a higher score indicating a better nutritional status and available of 163 participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessing Nutritional Status in Elderly Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m2) and classified according to the World Health Organization criteria [17 ]. Patients older than 60 years were classified according to BMI for the elderly according to Pan American Health Organization criteria [18 ].
The NRS 2002 is used to predict outcome based on risk parameters identified in the nutritional assessment. Patients are classified as at nutritional risk, when they obtain a sum of > 3 points. [19 (link)]
The validated Portuguese version of the scored PG-SGA was used to assess nutritional status. Subjective analysis classified the patients into three categories: (A) well-nourished, (B) moderately undernourished or suspected of being undernourished, and (C) severely undernourished. [20 ]
The phase angle (PA) was calculated as the ratio between resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) determined with QuadScan 4000 instrument (Bodystat Ltd., Isle of Man) which applies a 200 μA current at frequencies of 5, 50, 100, and 200 kHz. The PA for the whole body at 50 kHz was calculated from the impedance values using software supplied by Bodystat Ltd. All procedures and control for other variables affecting the validity, reproducibility and precision of the measurements were performed according to the National Institutes of Health guidelines. [21 ]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!