The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using esp 300 spectrometer

1

Comprehensive Biochar Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the biochars were recorded by a Hitachi S-4800 scanning microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) nitrogen specific surface areas of biochars were determined by N2 adsorption–desorption at 77 K with a Tristrar II 3020 surface area analyzer (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The contents of C, N, and H were determined in a Vario EL III elemental analyzer (Elementar, GmbH, Hanau, Germany). The O content was calculated based on the equation: O% = 100% − C% − H% − N% − ash content. The micro IR spectra were recorded in the range of 4000–600 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 using a Nicolet Nexus-470 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet, San Diego, CA, USA). The solid-state 13C-NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker DSX2300 spectrometer (Bruker, Faellanden, Switzerland) operated at 100.37 MHz. The sample was packed in a 4 mm rotor with a contact time of 3000 μs. The scan times were more than 20,000. ESR spectra were undertaken using a Bruker ESP300 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA) and operated at 100 kHz modulation and 9.75 GHz microwave frequency.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

EPR Spin Adduct Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for EPR were sequentially thawed, placed into calibrated 50 µL glass capillaries and single scanned for their spin adduct content using a Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) operating at X-band (9.81 GHz) with a 100-KHz modulation frequency. Spectra (magnetic field resolution, 2048 points) were recorded at room temperature 1 min after thawing of the sample using the following parameters: microwave power, 10 mW; modulation amplitude, 0.63 G; receiver gain, 5 × 105; time constant, 20.48 ms; and scan rate, 0.7 G/s for a sweep width of 120 G. Computer simulations of the EPR signals were carried out assuming they consisted of varying mixtures of DEPMPO-OH, the DEPMPO/hydroxyl radical (HO•) spin adduct (giving an 8-line spectrum with coupling constants aN = 14.0 G; aH = 13.3 G and aP = 47.2 G) and DEPMPO-OOH (the DEPMPO/O2•− spin adduct), the main trans-DEPMPO-OOH diastereoisomer of which existing as two fast-exchanging rotamers (65:35%), both giving 12-lines spectra with aN = 13.3(12.9) G; aH = 12.2(8.6) G and aP = 53.9(43.0) G [22 (link),36 (link)] (see structures in Scheme S1). Relative spin adduct concentrations were obtained by double integration of the simulated signals using WinSim software [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EPR Spectroscopy of Biomolecular Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPR spectra were obtained using a Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a low noise microwave amplifier (Miteq, Hauppauge, New York, USA) and a loop-gap resonator (Medical Advances, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). The modulation amplitude was set to be no greater than one-fourth of the line width. The spectra were collected at room temperature in the first-derivative mode with 1 mW microwave power. The detailed EPR samples preparation followed the methods as described (Lu et al., 2014 (link); Lu, Song & Shin, 2010 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photolysis Study of SAM-Bound Clusters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-band and Q-band continuous wave (CW) spectroscopies were conducted using a Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer and a Bruker EMX spectrometer, respectively, both equipped with continuous helium flow Oxford cryostats. Photolysis was carried out for varying times using a 450 nm Thorlabs diode laser situated ≲1 cm from samples in the EPR cavity maintained at 12 K. Generally, the integrity of a SAM-bound cluster prior to photolysis was checked at 12 K, photolysis was performed, and then the temperature was raised to 40 K to characterize radical species. The modulation amplitude was normally set to 10 G, while the power was at 1 or 2 mW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pulse EPR Spectrometry Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-band continuous wave (CW) measurements were performed on a Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer with an ER 041 MR microwave bridge and an ER 4116DM resonator. All other EPR measurements were performed on a Bruker Elexsys E580 X-band spectrometer equipped with a SuperX-FT microwave bridge. For pulse EPR measurements at X-band, a Bruker ER 4118X-MS5 resonator was used in concert with an Oxford CF935 helium flow cryostat. Microwave pulses generated by the microwave bridge were amplified by a 1 kW traveling wave tube (TWT) amplifier (Applied Systems Engineering, model 117x). Pulse EPR spectra at Q-band frequencies were acquired using a home-built intermediate-frequency extension of the SuperX-FT X-band bridge that has a Millitech 5W pulse power amplifier. All experiments were conducted on a home-built TE011 resonator utilizing the open resonator concept developed by Annino et al.62 and mechanical construction of the probehead similar to that presented by Reijerse et al.63 (link) This setup allows t(π/2) = 12–16 ns at maximum input power with spectrometer dead time (including the resonator ring time) of 100–120 ns. Data acquisition and control of experimental parameters were performed by using Bruker XEPR software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

EPR Spectroscopy of Biomolecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EPR spectra were obtained using a Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) equipped with a low-noise microwave amplifier (Miteq, Hauppauge, NY) and loop gap resonator (Medical Advances, Milwaukee, WI). The modulation amplitude was set at no greater than one-fourth of the line width. Spectra were collect at room temperature in the first-derivative mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Continuous-wave EPR Spectroscopy of 1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous-wave (CW) X-band (9.32 GHz) EPR spectra of 1 were collected on a modified Bruker ESP-300 spectrometer with 100 kHz field modulation (4 G modulation amplitude) at 20 K through the utilization of an Oxford Instruments liquid helium flow cryostat. Simulations of EPR spectra were performed using the MATLAB EasySpin (v4.5) toolbox (easyspin.org).17 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spin-Labeled SNARE Complex Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used the pull down method to purify spin labeled trans-SNAREpin in between nanodiscs. Spin-labeled VAMP-2 was incorporated into the His-tag-free v-nanodisc and the unlabeled t-SNARE was incorporated into the 6× His-tagged t-nanodisc, respectively. The t-nanodiscs were attached to Ni-NTA sepharose beads and equal molar quantities of S-v-nanodiscs were then added and incubated for overnight at 4 °C to form spin labeled trans-SNAREpin. After washing out of unbound free S-v-nanodiscs spin labeled trans-SNAREpins were eluted from the beads by imidazole. To obtain spin labeled cis–SNARE complex in the nanodisc, the mixture of syntaxin-1a, 6× His-tagged SNAP-25, and spin-labeled VAMP-2 were incubated with molar ratio of 1:2:1. Unbound syntaxin-1a and spin-labeled VAMP-2 were washed out using the Ni-NTA column and the complex was then incorporated into the nanodisc. Each spin-labeled VAMP-2 was reconstituted into nanodiscs for the EPR measurement. EPR spectra were collected in the first-derivative mode with 1 mW microwave power using the Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer equipped with a loop-gap resonator. The modulation amplitude was set at no greater than one-fourth of the line width. All EPR measurements were performed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spectroscopic Characterization of MoFe Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV-visible spectra were collected on a Varian Cary 50 spectrophotometer. The samples were sealed inside a 1-cm path-length quartz cuvette under anoxic conditions. Continuous-wave X-band EPR spectra were recorded using a Bruker ESP-300 spectrometer with an EMX PremiumX microwave bridge and an EMXPLUS standard resonator in perpendicular mode, equipped with an Oxford Instruments ESR900 continuous helium flow cryostat using VC40 flow controller for helium gas. Spectra were recorded at the following conditions: temperature, ∼12 K; microwave frequency, ∼9.38 GHz; microwave power, 20 milliwatts; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 8.14 G; time constant, 20.48 ms. If not specified, each spectrum is the sum of five scans and is presented in this work after subtracting the cavity background signal recorded with an EPR tube with frozen 200 mm MOPS buffer. Final spectra were normalized to 43.5 μm MoFe protein based on absolute α- and β-subunit concentrations in the sample as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

EPR Analysis of Persimmon Extract Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Bruker ESP 300 spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany) equipped with an ER 4102 ST resonator was used to perform the EPR measurements. The instrument parameters were as follows: microwave power, 2 mW; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation amplitude, 1.0 G; magnetic field scan, 100 G; sweep time, 168 s; and detector time constant, 41 ms; receive gain, 105. All measurements were performed at room temperature (24–26 °C). Hydroxyl radicals formed by Fenton reagents (50 µM Fe(II) and 100 µM H2O2) in buffered media (10 mM phosphate, pH 7.2) were trapped by DMPO (20 mM) (Zalomaeva et al., 2007 (link)). The effect of different concentrations of persimmon extract was investigated against DMPO hydroxylation. Spectra were acquired until 3 min after reaction started and the quantification of DMPO-OH adduct was done by measurement of first line resonance peak height diminished of EPR baseline signal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!