The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti par monoclonal antibody

Manufactured by Bio-Techne

The Anti-PAR monoclonal antibody is a research-use-only laboratory reagent produced by Bio-Techne. It is designed to detect the presence of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) in biological samples. PAR is a post-translational modification involved in various cellular processes. This antibody can be utilized in research applications that require the identification and quantification of PAR.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using anti par monoclonal antibody

1

PARG-Mediated DePARylation Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 6

Recombinant full length PARG protein is generated from Sf9 insect cells. Recombinant PAR is purified from a biochemical assay using PARP1. PARG is incubated with PAR in the presence of DMSO (Negative control, NC) or small chemical compounds for 20 minutes at room temperature. Positive control (PC) only contains PAR. Samples (1 μl) were spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Then, the membrane was baked for 30 minutes at 60° C. and blocked with TBST buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween 20) supplemented with 5% milk for 30 minutes at room temperature. After washing with TBST, the membrane was incubated with monoclonal anti-PAR antibody (Trevigen, Inc.) for overnight at 4° C. Following standard western blot method, the signals were visualized by chemiluminescent detection. With the chemical inhibition of the dePARylation activity of PARG, we are able to detect the dot signals of PAR.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PARP1 Knockout in U2OS Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS or 293 T cells were maintained in DMEM medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and cultivated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 (v/v). U2OS cells were transfected with PX459 vector containing PARP1-sgRNA for PARP1 knockout. Transfected cells were plated at low density in 1.5 mg/ml puromycin (Invitrogen). Single colonies were propagated, and individual clones were assessed by western blotting. Loss of PARP1 in U2OS cells was validated by anti-PARP1 antibody which was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Cat# 9542).
Cells were lysed with NETN buffer (0.5% NP40, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA) with Roche Protease Inhibitor Cocktail. Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting were performed following standard protocol as described previously20 (link). Rabbit anti-CTCF antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling. Monoclonal anti-PAR antibody was purchased from Trevigen. Mouse monoclonal anti-GFP antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PARG Activity Assay with PAR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant PAR was purified from a biochemical assay using PARP1 according to previous studies (61 (link)). The concentration of PAR was calculated as the ADP-ribose unit. Recombinant full-length PARG (0.25 nM) was incubated with 10 μM PAR in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (negative control) or small-molecule compounds in a 10-μl reaction for 20 min at room temperature. Positive control only contains PAR in PBS. For dot blotting analysis, samples (1 μl) were spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Then, the membrane was baked for 30 min at 60°C and blocked with TBST buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M tris-HCl at pH 7.4, and 0.1% Tween 20) supplemented with 5% milk for 30 min at room temperature. After washing with TBST, the membrane was incubated with anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (Trevigen) overnight at 4°C. Following standard Western blot method, the signals were visualized by chemiluminescent detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Inhibition Assays for PARP1 and TARG1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PARP1 inhibition assay, 0.2 μg of recombinant PARP1 was incubated with DMSO (control) or COH34 in a 10-μl reaction mixture [10 mM tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 125 μM NAD+, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and octameric oligonucleotide GGAATTCC (5 ng/μl)] for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were analyzed by dot blotting with anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (Trevigen). For TARG1 inhibition assay, mono–ADP-ribosylated PARP10 was generated in a 10-μl incubation mixture comprising 50 ng of GST-tagged PARP10, 100 μM tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 μM MgCl2, 320 μM NAD+, and 100 μM dithiothreitol for 30 min at 37°C. Following incubation, GST beads were added to conjugate mono–ADP-ribosylated PARP10 for 2 hours at 4°C and then washed with Mg2+-contained tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) three times to remove residual NAD+. Beads (10 μl) were incubated with 0.5 μM TARG1 and DMSO (control) or COH34 in a 15-μl reaction for 30 min at 37°C. The samples were boiled in the SDS sample buffer at 95°C, and eluates were analyzed by Western blot with anti-adenosine diphosphate ribose antibody (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pharmacokinetics of COH34 in Mouse Tumor Models

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female NSG mice (8 weeks old; The Jackson Laboratory) were inoculated with 8 million HCC1395 or 10 million PEO-1 cells subcutaneously. Mice were separated into treatment groups (n = 30 per group) of roughly equal tumor size (100 mm3) and dosed with COH34 (20 mg/kg) in 30% solutol or vehicle (30% solutol) once via intraperitoneal injection. Tumor size was measured by an electronic caliper using the standard formula: 0.5 × length × width2. After dosing at 0.5, 2, 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours, mice were euthanized using a CO2 gas chamber, and tumors (n = 5 per time point) were harvested and frozen by dry ice. Tumors were suspended in 500 μl of 1% SDS lysis buffer [1% SDS, 10 mM Hepes (pH 8.5), 500 U of Benzonase (Millipore), and 2 mM MgCl2] and then homogenized by a Tissuemizer. To remove SDS, sample solution was centrifuged at 1000g at 4°C for 10 min after adding 25 μl of SDS precipitation reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were then analyzed by dot blotting with anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (Trevigen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

TRF1 PARylation by PARP-1 Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the analysis of TRF1 PARylation by PARP-131 (link), 160 ng of wt or delta acidic hTRF1/sample were incubated in the reaction buffer containing 5 units of hPARP-1 (High Specific Activity, Trevigen), 2.5 μg DNase I-activated calf thymus DNA, 200 mM NAD+, Tris-HCl pH 8, 10 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM dithiothreitol. After 30 min of incubation at 25 °C, the reaction was stopped by the addition of a Laemmli sample buffer and samples were analyzed by gel electrophoresis on 8% SDS-PAGE and Western blot. PARylated PARP1, hTRF1 or delta acidic hTRF1 were detected using anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (Trevigen) and input TRF1 was revealed with anti-His (anti 6-His Rabbit Pab Sigma Aldrich) or anti TRF1 antibody (rabbit Pab sc-6165, Santa Cruz). For the detection of biotin-labeled PARylated proteins the same assay was conducted in presence of biotin-NAD + (Sigma Aldrich) followed by SDS-PAGE and western blot detection with anti-streptavidin HRP antibody (Molecular Probes).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of PAR Hydrolysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 9

Recombinant PAR was purified from a biochemical assay using PARP1. The concentration of PAR was calculated as the ADP-ribose unit. Recombinant full length PARG was incubated with 10 μM PAR in the presence of DMSO (negative control) or small molecule compounds (CHP20-25) in a 10 μl reaction for 20 minutes at room temperature. Positive control only contains PAR in PBS. For dot blotting analysis, samples (1 μl) were spotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Then, the membrane was baked for 30 minutes at 60° C. and blocked with TBST buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween 20) supplemented with 5% milk for 30 minutes at room temperature. After washing with TBST, the membrane was incubated with anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (Trevigen) overnight at 4° C. Following standard western blot method, the signals were visualized by chemiluminescent detection and results are shown in FIG. 7A-FIG. 7F.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

KillerRed-mediated photoinduction and DNA damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The KillerRed system was a gift from L. Lan (University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA). Activation of KillerRed followed the method as previously described (62 (link)). Briefly, U2OS tet response element (TRE) cells with transfection of pBROAD3/tetR-KR were pretreated without or with 0.1 μM COH34 for 1 hour before exposure to a 15-W white fluorescent bulb for 10 min (height to light is 15 cm). Following 1 or 10 min of recovery, samples were examined by immunofluorescence with anti-KillerRed antibody (Evrogen), anti-PAR monoclonal antibody (Trevigen), or anti-XRCC1 antibody (GeneTex). Images were taken from a fluorescence microscope and analyzed by ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!