The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using hplc grade standards

1

Quantification of Simple Sugars by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The simple sugars profile was measured as described by Heredia-Olea et al. [30 (link)] and Alonso-Gómez et al. [31 (link)] with slight modifications. The samples were filtered through a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) syringe filter (0.2 µm) and injected into high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) equipment (Waters HPLC Breeze model, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a refractive index detector (Waters 2414) kept at 50 °C. The chromatographic separation was achieved using an ion-exclusion column Phenomenex Rezex ROA-organic acid h+ (250 × 4.6 mm, 8 µm particle size, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at 60 °C. The mobile phase consisted of a 5 mM H2SO4 solution with a 20 min isocratic flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1 and with an injection volume of 10 μL. Glucose, maltose, and fructose quantifications were performed with calibration curves of HPLC-grade standards (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
Calibration curves for glucose (1–25 mg mL−1), maltose (0.5–5 mg mL−1), and fructose (1–25 mg mL−1) of HPLC-grade standards (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were constructed for quantification purposes (data not shown).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenolic compounds were analyzed by HPLC (Waters 2695; C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm × 5 μm size particle) and the absorbance was measured at 280 nm by a Waters 2478 Dual λ Absorbance Detector. The mobile phase of acidified water containing 1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) was used. The setting procedure of the gradient was as follows: 0 min, 20% B; 17 min, 21.5% B; 17.5 min, 68% B; 40 min, 68.3% B; 41 min, 100% B; 51 min, 20% B, and held for 2 min. The volume of injection was 20 μL and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. All HPLC-grade standards (ferulic acid, epicatechin, catechins, phloridzin, phloretin, caffeic acid, rutin, and chlorogenic acid) were purchased from Sigma Chemicals. Identification of each peak was performed on the basis of comparing their retention times with their known standards. The concentration of phenolic contents was expressed as milligrams of each compound per liter of juice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Strawberry Anthocyanin Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pH differential method (Lee et al., 2005 (link)) was used to measure the total anthocyanin content. Approximately 1.5 g strawberry fruit was extracted with 15 mL pre-cooled extraction buffer (1% HCl-ethanol) on ice for 4 h, and then centrifuged (8000 × g, 4°C) for 25 min. The supernatant was measured for total anthocyanin content. The main anthocyanin pelargonidin-3-glucoside in strawberry fruits was determined by the HPLC method (Yonekura and Tamura, 2019 (link)). Anthocyanins were extracted using 1% HCl in a methanol solution, which was subsequently detected by a Silgreen ODS C18 column using an Agilent HPLC system with a DAD detector at 510 nm. The anthocyanins, listed as follows, were detected using a linear gradient eluent program: 5% formic acid in water as eluent A and methanol as eluent B, 100-0% A in B was used for 20 min, followed by 100% B for 5 min. A 10-µL sample was injected, the flow rate was set to 1 mL/min. The concentration of anthocyanins was quantified by comparing with the corresponding external standards. All HPLC-grade standards were purchased from Sigma (USA). Experiments were independently repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phytochemical Analysis of Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS-grade acetonitrile, methanol, and formic acid, analytical-grade ethanol for extraction, and Folin–Ciocalteu reagent were purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, PA, USA). The HPLC-grade standards (gallic, protocatechuic, 4-hydroxybenzoic, vanillic, gentisic, salicylic, trans-caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, cis- and trans-rosmarinic, isoferulic acids) and DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) were provided by Sigma Aldrich (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). LC-MS-grade water was prepared using a MilliQ system (Millipore S.A., Molsheim, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Strawberry Anthocyanins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anthocyanin content in strawberry fruits was determined following the method of Donno et al. [52 ], which involved using 1% HCL methanol solution and 30% methanol to extract anthocyanins, respectively. The anthocyanins were subsequently detected at a wavelength of 510 using an Agilent HPLC system with a DAD detector and a Silgreen ODS C18 column. The detection of anthocyanidins was achieved using a linear gradient elution procedure, where a 5% formic acid aqueous solution was used as eluent A, and methanol was used as eluent B. The procedure involved 100–0% A/B for 20 min, followed by 100% B for 5 min. Isocratic elution was performed using acetonitrile/water 12:88 (v/v) and 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phase for 16 min, and the sample was injected at 10 µL, with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The HPLC grade standards were purchased from Sigma (USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Polyphenol Analysis of Digested Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyphenolic profiles of the undigested and digested samples of the WG and MG infusions (see Section 4.2) were evaluated by HPLC-DAD analysis using a 1200 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a 1200 series DAD (Agilent Technologies). Analytes were identified and quantified using HPLC-grade standards (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), a calibration curve approach (0.1–100 mg L−1), and Agilent ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies) following the method previously described [7 (link)]. Results were expressed as mg g−1 DW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenolic Analysis of Freeze-Dried PFE and PPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical analyses were performed on PFE and PPE after freeze drying. The identification and quantification of the various phenolic components was determined using HPLC-DAD as described by Romani et al. [34 (link)]. Analyses were carried out using a Varian ProStar 210 multisolvent pump and ProStar 335 photodiode array detector (Varian BV, Middelburg, The Netherlands). A Phenomenex Kinetex Phenyl-Hexyl 100 A 150 × 4.6 mm reverse-phase C18 column (Danaher Corporation, Torrance, CA, USA), with the same pre-column, was used for the separation and analysis at 25 °C. Water/acetic acid (99.9:0.1) and methanol/water CH3COOH made up the eluent (95:4.9:0.1). In particular, α and β punicalagin, and ellagic acid were identified by comparing the retention time and the spectrum with HPLC-grade standards (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The quantification was obtained using the calibration curve made with the relative standard. All analyses were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of 2-PE and L-Phe by UHPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2-PE and L-Phe were quantified as previously reported (Usai et al., 2022 (link)). In brief, 2-PE production was assessed by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC UltiMate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) equipped with a Hypersil GOLD™ C18 Reversed Phase Column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States); acetonitrile and H2O (50:50) were used with 1 mL min-1 flow rate at 40°C and UV-detection at 205 nm. L-phenylalanine was quantified through the Hypersil GOLD™ Amino column (120 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) at 210 nm, and 9 mM sulfuric acid was pumped at 0.8 mL min-1; column oven was heated at 50°C. For sample preparation, 1 mL of bacterial culture was collected and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 10 min, and 20 μL of the supernatant was injected for HPLC analysis. 2-PE and L-Phe were both externally calibrated by using HPLC-grade standards (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!