The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rt 2560 capillary column

Manufactured by Restek
Sourced in United States, Italy

The RT-2560 capillary column is a high-performance chromatographic column designed for the separation and analysis of complex fatty acid mixtures. It features a highly polar 100% cyanopropyl stationary phase, providing excellent resolution and peak shape for a wide range of fatty acid samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using rt 2560 capillary column

1

Fatty Acid Profiling via Gas Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acid profile was determined after extracting the total lipids and performing esterification and methylation processes using the method in accordance with Folch et al. [16 (link)]. After the extracted lipid was converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), the FA profiles were analyzed using a gas chromatography–flame ionization detector (Varian 450-GC, Bruker Daltonics Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). Injector and detector temperatures were held at 260 °C. The oven temperature was initially 120 °C for 5 min and was increased to 230 °C at 3 °C/min and held at that temperature for 3 min, and then increased to 240 °C at a rate of 1.5 °C/min and held for 5 min. The samples containing FAMEs in hexane (1.0 μL) were injected through the split injection port (10:1) onto an RT-2560 capillary column (100 m length, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.20 μm film thickness; RESTEK, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Individual FAMEs were identified by comparing their retention times with those of authenticated standards, and the results were expressed as a percentage of the total FAMEs. In addition, individual FAs were used to calculate the sums of saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive GC-FID Analysis of FAMEs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FAMEs were analyzed using a Shimadzu® GC-2010 Plus Gas Chromatograph (GC) coupled with a flame ionization detector (FID) equipped with an Rt-2560 capillary column (100 m length, 0.25 mm diameter, 0.20 μm film thickness, Restek®). A modified AOAC method 996.06 was used. One-microliter samples of FAMEs were injected. The carrier gas was helium with a flow rate of 1.74 mL.min−1. The temperature program was as follows: after injection, the temperature was initially held at 100 °C for 4 min and then increased to 240 °C with a 3 °C.min−1 heating ramp. The injector temperature was set to 225 °C, and the FAMEs were detected with flame ionization using a detector set at 285 °C. The flow rate in the detector was a mix of three gases: 40 mL.min−1 of H2, 30 mL.min−1 of He, and 400 mL.min−1 of air. Standard molecules of the FAMEs mixture (C4–C24) were injected for FAME identification (Supelco® 37 Component Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Mix, Sigma-Aldrich®).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GC Analysis of Fatty Acid Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction, derivatization, and analysis by gas chromatography of fatty acids were conducted as described previously [21 (link)]. Oil was extracted by a chloroform/methanol (2/1, v/v) solution. The derivatization conversion was performed with methanol under alkaline conditions. The fatty acids were separated and quantified using a GC–FID system 7890B (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with a Rt®-2560 capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 µm; Restek, Part N° 13199, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The oven temperature began at 140 °C for ten minutes, and then increased at 3 °C/min to 240 °C. A standard of C4–C24 (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) unsaturated FAME mix was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fatty Acid Profiling in Red Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RBC total lipids were extracted with chloroform/methanol/water (2:2:1.8; v:v:v) according to the Bligh and Dyer method. Nonadecanoic acid (C19:0; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as internal standard. Each sample was then dried under nitrogen and methylated at 70°C through a 1 h-incubation with 0.5 ml of 0.1 mol/l KOH in methanol, followed by a 15 min-incubation in 0.2 ml of 1.2 mol/l HCl in methanol. The fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were then extracted by 1 ml hexane and separated by gaz chromatography (Schneider et al., 2012 (link)). The chromatograph (GC Trace-1310, Thermo Quest, Italy) was equipped with a RT2560 capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.2 μm film thickness; Restek) and a flame ionization detector (FID, Thermo Quest). The carrier gas used was H2 at constant pressure (200 kPa). The FID was continuously flowed by H2 (35 ml/min) and air (350 ml/min) and kept at a constant temperature of 255°C. The temperature program was as follows: an initial temperature of 80°C, which increased at 25°C/min up to 175°C, a holding temperature of 175°C during 25 min, a new increase at 10°C/min up to 205°C, a holding temperature of 205°C during 4 min, a new increase at 10°C/min up to 215°C, a holding temperature of 215°C during 25 min, a last increase at 10°C/min up to 235°C and a final holding temperature of 235°C during 10 min (Ferain et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fatty Acid Profiling of DHAO Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method used was adapted from Mellery et al. [41 (link)]. DHAO sample (200 mg) was weighed and converted to fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) via a two-step methylation with nonadecanoic acid (C19: 0, Sigma-Aldrich) used as internal standard. First, the oil was methanolysed with 10 mL of 0.1 M KOH in methanol at 70 °C for 60 min, then cooled to room temperature. Second, an acid-catalysed methanolysis was carried out by adding 4 mL of 1.2 M HCl in methanol and incubating at 70 °C for 20 min. The FAME were then extracted by addition of hexane and Milli-Q water. The FAME were separated and quantified by running samples in a GC Trace 1310 (ThermoQuest, Milan, Italy) gas chromatograph equipped with an As Triplus autosampler (Thermo Electron, Milan, Italy), an RT2560 capillary column of 100 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and a flame ionisation detector set at 255 °C. Fatty acids in the samples were identified and quantified by comparison of retention time and peak area with those of pure FAME standards (Larodan, Solna, Sweden). The data were processed using the Chromquest 5.0 data processing software (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and results are expressed as mg/g of oil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Intramuscular Fat Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IMF analysis, the tissue samples of the LT muscle (30 g) were freeze-dried and pulverized. Thereafter, an examination of the IMF content of LT muscle tissue samples was conducted using the ether extraction method according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists regulations [34 ]. The expression of IMF content was reported as g of lipid in 100 g of muscle tissue. After the extraction of lipids, they were converted into FA methyl esters (FAMEs) using the method described in a previously published study [5 (link)]. The FA composition was evaluated with the method established in our previous study [15 (link)] by using a gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID, SCION 456-GC, Bruker Daltonics, Fremont, CA, USA). Separation was performed on an RT-2560 capillary column (RESTEK, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The FAMEs were identified and quantified with a 37-component standard FAME Mix (RESTEK). Individually, FA composition values were reported as g per 100 g of total FAs. Subsequently, sums of SFAs (C12:0 + C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0 + C20:0), MUFAs (C16:1n-7 + C18:1n-9 + C20:1n-9), and n-6 polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) (C18:2n-6 + C18:3n-6 + C20:2n-6 + C20:3n-6 + C20:4n-6) were estimated. Lastly, ratios of MUFAs to SFAs, MUFAs to n-6 PUFAs, and n-6 PUFAs to SFAs were then calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Intramuscular Fat Content in Crossbred Pigs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. A total of 620 commercially crossbred pigs (Duroc and Large White×Landrace) (322 gilts and 298 barrows) were reared under commercial conditions. Animals were slaughtered according to applicable standards at the slaughter-weight of 90 kg. The LD muscles were collected from the 10th rib for DNA extraction and for IMF content measurement. The genomic DNA was extracted according to the standard phenol-chloroform protocol. The IMF content of each LD sample was determined by the ether extraction method and expressed as the percentage of IMF in fresh meat. Fatty acid composition was determined by using a gas chromatography apparatus (SCION 456-GC, Bruker Daltonic Inc, Fremont, CA, USA) with a RT-2560 capillary column (RESTEK, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Fatty acid composition was reported as the percentage of total fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Porcine Intramuscular Fat Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. A total of 324 pigs (188 gilts and 136 barrows) were obtained from a commercial Duroc population (Betagro Hybrid International Company, Thailand) . All of the pigs were reared under commercial conditions and slaughtered at about 90 kg of body weight. Longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle samples from the 10th rib were collected and used to determine IMF content by the ether extraction method (AOAC, 2000) (link). FA composition was measured by gas chromatography (SCION 456-GC, Bruker Daltonics Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) with an RT-2560 capillary column (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Individual FAs were calculated as a percentage of total FAs. The proportions of saturated (C14:0, C16:0, C18:0, and C20:0), monounsaturated (C16:1n-9, C18:1n-9, and C20:1n-9), polyunsaturated (C18:2n-6, C18:3n-6, C20:2n-6, C20:3n-6, and C20:4n-6), w3 (C18:3n-3, C20:5n-3, and C22:6n-3), w6 (C18:2n-6, C18:3n-6, and C20:3n-6), and w9 (C16:1n-9 and C18:1n-9) FAs were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!