The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti sox2 antibody

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

The Anti-SOX2 antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of the SOX2 protein in various biological samples. SOX2 is a transcription factor that plays a critical role in the maintenance of stem cell pluripotency and the regulation of cell fate determination. The Anti-SOX2 antibody can be used in techniques such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and immunocytochemistry to identify and quantify the expression levels of SOX2 in cells and tissues.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using anti sox2 antibody

1

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and Quantitative PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was conducted with a SimpleChIP Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (#9003; Cell Signaling Technology) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Immunoprecipitation was carried out using anti‐SOX2 antibodies (#5024; Cell Signaling Technology), normal rabbit IgG (#2729; Cell Signaling Technology) as a negative control, and anti‐histone H3 antibodies (#4620; Cell Signaling Technology) as a positive control. Quantification of DNA by real‐time PCR was performed as described above with primers targeting the CDKN1A promoter (#6449; Cell Signaling Technology) and RPL30 promoter (#7014; Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed by RIPA buffer and centrifuged (12,000 g × 30 min) to collect total protein in the supernatant, which were mixed with 5× SDS loading buffer (P0015, Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and heated to 100°C (10 min) for denaturation. After SDS-PAGE and transfer to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, the membranes were blocked by 5% skim milk solution and incubated with the corresponding primary antibodies at 4°C for a night. After three times wash, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibody and then washed for another three times, followed by chemiluminescent exposure of the blot with NcmECL Ultra (P10100, NCM Biotech, Suzhou, China). The primary antibodies were as follows: Anti-CD44 antibodies (15675-1-AP, Proteintech, Chicago, The United States), Anti-CD133 antibodies (18470-1-AP, Proteintech), Anti-SOX2 antibodies (#3579, Cell Signaling Technology, Massachusetts, The United States), Anti-C-MYC antibodies (#5605, Cell Signaling Technology), Anti-GAPDH antibodies (GB11002, Servicebio, Wuhan, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins in cells were collected using cell lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology). Bradford Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology) was used for measuring proteins concentration. Western blotting was conducted using a similar method described in the earlier literature. Anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) antibody (#13110), anti-p21 antibody (#2947), anti-SOX2 antibody (#3579), anti-N-cadherin (N-cad) antibody (#13116), anti-P65 antibody (#8242), anti-P65S536 antibody (#3033), anti-TAK1 (#5206), anti-phospho-IKKβ (ser180, #2697), anti-IKKβ (#8943) and anti-GAPDH antibody (#5174) were supplied by Cell Signaling Technology (MA, USA). Anti-TRAF6 antibody (ab33915), anti-vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1) antibody (ab134047), anti-CD44 antibody (ab189524) and anti-matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) antibody (ab51074) were supplied by Abcam Biotechnology (MA, USA). Signals of proteins were visualized through enhanced chemiluminescence technique. The relative protein expressions were calculated using Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were resuspended in lysis buffer and incubated on ice for 30 min. The cell suspension was homogenized and then centrifuged at 12,000 r.p.m. for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and denatured at 95 °C for 10 min before loading. Equal amounts of protein were separated in 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare). The primary antibodies used in this study included: anti-GAPDH antibody and anti-Sox2 antibody from Cell Signaling Technology, anti-PAI-1 antibody from Santa Cruz. Both anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were from Abcam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis in Liver Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lysate from Hep3B and Huh7 cells was prepared using RIPA lysis buffer (radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer), and the protein concentration was measured with Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (23,225, ThermoFisher, American). The level of SOX2 was detected with the anti-SOX2 antibody (2748, Cell signaling, American). HIF1A antibody (AF1935, R&D Systems, America), cleaved caspase3 antibody (8202S, Cell Signaling Technology, America) and PCNA antibody (GTX100539, GeneTex, China) were used in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SOX2 ChIP-seq in NCI-H520 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 50 million NCI-H520 (American Type Culture Collection, HTB-182) cells were fixed with 1% PFA and then subjected to ChIP with an anti-SOX2 antibody (Cell Signaling, catalog no. 5024) using the Cell Signaling SimpleChIP enzymatic ChIP kit (Cell Signaling, catalog no. 9003) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Input and SOX2-immunoprecipitated chromatin samples were sequenced at the Duke University Genome Sequencing and Analysis Core. Approximately 31 million input and 26 million SOX2-immunoprecipitated 36-base-pair reads were acquired. Reads were mapped to human genome assembly GRCh37/hg19 using Bowtie via the Galaxy online analysis toolkit (http://galaxyproject.org) (Goecks et al. 2010 (link)). SOX2-binding sites were then predicted using Model-Based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) version 1.4.1 (Zhang et al. 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tissue Fixation and Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, and then sliced into 3–5 μm sections. After deparaffinization, sections were stained with H&E or were processed for IHC using anti-PAI-1 antibody (Santa Cruz) or anti-Sox2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). After staining, sections were dehydrated, cleared with xylene and mounted with resinene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP-PCR for SOX2 Binding Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-PCR) was carried out using Simple ChIP plus Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling: #9005) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In summary, 5 × 106 cells were plated in a 100 mm culture dish with 7 mL of complete FBM and cultured for 16 h. Following whole-cell cross-linking with 1% formaldehyde and lysis, the nuclear pellet was digested by Micrococcal nuclease and sonicated to achieve desired chromatin fragmentation. The resulting chromatin−protein complexes were incubated with anti-SOX2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) or negative control IgG (Vector Laboratories) overnight. After immunoprecipitation, protein G magnetic beads (50 μL) were added and incubated and the antibody complexes were incubated at 65 °C overnight for reverse cross-linking. The purified DNA was then collected, and the relative enrichment of specific regions in ChIP-DNA was determined using SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) in an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR (Applied Biosystems). Primer oligonucleotides used in the ChIP study are shown in the Supporting Information, Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying SOX2 Expression in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five micron sections were stained with anti-SOX2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies #23064) at a dilution of 1:300. Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (diluted 1:100), was applied and incubated for 30 minutes. Slides were incubated with Avidin-Biotinylated HRP Complex (ABC reagent) for 30 minutes, followed by a 5-minute incubation with the HRP substrate, DAB (3,3’-diamnobenzidine) from the Vectastain ABC HPR kit (Cat. PK-4001, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). SOX2 staining densities within cancer cores were quantified using Aperio ImageScope by an experimenter naïve to clinical information. The immunohistochemical score of a given specimen was averaged from all optimally stained cores. Cores with inadequate representation of tumor tissue were omitted from further analysis. H-Scores were determined using the nuclear quantification algorithm according to the following formula: H score = [(3×strong%)+(2×moderate%)+(weak%)]. Continuous variable scoring was used to evaluate correlations with other markers but we also looked at the dichotomous versions for SOX2, but not e-cadherin or vimentin. Low expression of SOX2 was defined as scores of 0 or 1. SOX2 expression scores were available on 195 patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SOX2OT Overexpression Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MammoCult medium was purchased from Stem Cell Technologies. Anti-SOX2 antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (catalogue number 2748). Goat anti-Rabbit IgG2a antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (catalogue number SC-2054).
SOX2OT and control vectors (EX-hLUC-M90) were purchased from GeneCopoeia. The SOX2OT construct was custom made using SOX2OT splice variant with accession number NR_004053.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!